Influence of design and implantation technique on the risk of progressive subsidence of different cervical interbody fusion devices;Einfluss von design und implantationstechnik auf das risiko der progredienten sinterung verschiedener HWS-cages

Orthopade

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 466-471

  Furderer S ^a   Schollhuber F ^a   Rompe, J D ^b   Eysel, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER MAINZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Cervical spine; Interbody fusion device

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL SPINE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANTATION; NERVE ENDING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SPINE FUSION;

EID: 0036941809     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-001-0289-2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bagby GW (1988) Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression using a stainless steel implant. Orthopaedics 11: 931-934
2. Closkey RF, Parsone JR, Lee KC, Blackskin MF, Zimmermann MC (1993) Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. Spine 18: 1011-1015
3. Cloward RB (1952) The treatment of ruptured intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. Ann Surg 136: 987-988
4. Eysel P, Roosen K (1993) Operative Zugangswege und deren Komplikationen bei zervikalen Bandscheibenvorfällen. Ortop Prax 29: 514-517
5. Eysel P, Fürderer S, Rompe JD, Zöllner J (2000) Die Primärstabilität unterschiedlicher Cages zur Fusion an der Halswirbelsäule. Zentralbl Neurochir 61: 1-6
6. Godard J, Jacquet G, Farhat O, Steimle R (1991) Intervertebral biopolymer implant for arthrodesis. A study of 45 cases. Chirurgie 117: 403-404
7. Jost B, Cripton PA, Lund T, Oxland TR, Lippuner K, Jäger P, Nolte LP (1998) Compressive strength of interbody cages in the lumbar spine: the effect of cage shape, posterior instrumentation and bone density. Eur Spine J 7: 132-141
8. Kaden B, Swammy S, Schmitz HJ, Reddeman H, Fuhrmann G, Gross U (1993) Titanium implant as an alternative possibility in fusion of the cervical vertebrae-initial clinical experiences. Zentralbl Neurochir 54: 166-170
9. Knöringer P (1999) Muss eine geschädigte Bandscheibe bei Degeneration fusioniert werden?-Pro. In: Wilke H-J, Claes LE (Hrsg) Die traumatische und degenerative Bandscheibe. Hefte Unfallchir 271: 313-322
10. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Griffith SL, Ahern JW, Dowdle JD (1998) The Bagby and Kuslich method of lumbar interbody fusion: history, techniques, and 2-year follow-up results of a United States prospective multicenter trial. Spine 23: 1267-1297
11. Robinson RA, Walker AE, Ferlic DC, Wiecking DK (1962) The results of an anterior interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44: 1569-1587
12. Roosen K, Grote W, Bettag W (1975) Komplikationen zervikaler ventraler Fusionsoperationen. Neurochirurgia 18: 1-4
13. Shima T, Keller JT, Alvira MM, Mayfield FH, Dunsker SB (1979) Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion. An experimental study using a synthetic tricalcium phosphate. J Neurosurg 51: 533-538
14. Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40: 607
15. Stender W, Meissner HJ, Thomas W (1990) Ventral interbody spondylodesis using a new plug-shaped implant. Neurosurg Rev 13: 25-34
16. Von Strempel A, Seidel T, Plitz T (1994) Biomechanische Voraussetzungen zur Stabilitätsuntersuchung von Osteosyntheseverfahren an der Wirbelsäule. Unfallchirurg 97: 343
17. Willke H-J, Kettler A, Claes L (2000) Primary stabilizing effect of interbody fusion devices for the cervical spine: an in vitro comparison between three different cage types and bone cement. Eue Spine J 9: 410-416
18. Whitecloud TS (1999) Modern alternatives and techniques for one-level discectomy and fusion. Clin Orthop 359: 67-76
19. Younger EM, Chapman MW (1989) Morbidity at donor graft sites. J Orthop Trauma 3: 192-15