To pee or not to pee: Reconsidering the need for urinalysis

Journal of Drug Education

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 261-270

  Yacoubian Jr , George S ^a   Urbach, Blake J ^b  

^a McFarland Institute   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COCAINE; OPIATE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DRUG USE; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; SELF REPORT; STATISTICS; URINALYSIS;

ADULT; COCAINE-RELATED DISORDERS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; SELF DISCLOSURE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE DETECTION; UNITED STATES; URINALYSIS;

EID: 0036940037     PISSN: 00472379     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/FAW4-6GNP-Q6N7-V5MB     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. L. Harrison, The validity of self-reported data on drug use, Journal of Drug Issues, 25, pp. 91-111, 1995.
2. T. Mieczkowski, D. Barzelay, B. Gropper, and E. D. Wish, Concordance of three measures of cocaine use in an arrestee population: Hair, urine, and self-report, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 23, pp. 241-246, 1991.
3. R. Rosenfeld, and S. Decker. Discrepant values, correlated measures: Cross-cities and longitudinal comparisons of self-reports and urine tests of cocaine use among arrestees, Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, pp. 223-230, 1993.
4. E. D. Wish, J. A. Hoffman, and S. Nemes, The validity of self-reports of drug use at treatment admission and at follow-up: Comparisons with urinalysis and hair assays, in The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates, L. Harrison and A. Hughes (eds.), National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, pp. 200-226, 1997.
5. G. Yacoubian, Assessing ADAM's domain: Past, present, and future, Contemporary Drug Problems, 27, pp. 121-135, 2000.
6. National Institute of Justice, 1999 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Annual Report, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 2000.
7. R. Kane and G. Yacoubian, Patterns of drug escalation among philadelphia arrestees: An assessment of the gateway theory, Journal of Drug Issues, 29: 1, pp. 107-120, 1999.
8. R. Peters, G. Yacoubian, E. Baumler, M. Ross, and R. Johnson, heroin use among southern arrestees: Regional findings from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program, Journal of Addictions and Offender Counseling, in press.
9. J. Wellisch, M. D. Anglin, and M. L. Prendergast, numbers and characteristics of drug-using women in the criminal justice system: Implications for treatment, Journal of Drug Issues, 23: 1, pp. 7-30, 1993.
10. E. D. Wish, U.S. drug policy in the 1990s: Insights from new data from arrestees, The International Journal of the Addictions, 25, pp. 377-409, 1990.
11. G. Yacoubian and B. J. Urbach, Disproportional involvement in the use of crack and powder cocaine: Findings from the arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program, Alternate Routes, 17, pp. 54-70.
12. G. Yacoubian, Assessing the Temporal Stability of Drug-Using Classifications: An Examination of Washington, DC Arrestees between 1990 and 1997, Journal of Criminal Justice, 29:1,pp. 21-30, 2001.
13. G. Yacoubian, A Drug Use Typology for Treatment Intervention, Western Criminology Review, 1:2. Available on-line at http://wcr.sonoma.edu/vln2/yacoubian.html, 1999.
14. S. Magura and S. Kang, Validity of self-reported drug use in high-risk populations: A meta-analytical review, Substance Abuse and Misuse, 31, pp. 1131-1153, 1996.
15. J. A. Inciardi and K. McElrath, The American Drug Scene, Roxbury Publishing Company, California, 1998.
16. S. Walker, Sense and Nonsense About Crime and Drugs, Wadsworth Publishing Company, California, 1998.