Information on mammography-screening - From deception to insight;Information zum mammographiescreening - Vom trugschluss zur ent-täuschung

Radiologe

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 299-304

  Muhlhauser I ^a   Holdke B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Evidence based medicine; Informed decision making; Mammography; Mass screening; Patient information; Risk communication; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT INFORMATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING TEST;

EID: 0036939725     PISSN: 0033832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00117-002-0737-y     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L et al. (1988) Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. BMJ 297:943-948
2. Barratt A, Cockburn J, Furnival C, McBride A, Mallon L (1999) Perceived sensitivity of mammographic screening: women's views on test accuracy and financial compensation for missed cancers. J Epidemiol Comm Health S3:716-720
3. Beck-Bornholdt H-P, Dubben HH (2001) Der Hund, der Eier legt. Erkennen von Fehlinformationen durch Querdenken, 2. Aufl.rororo, Reinbeck
4. Berger M, Mühlhauser I (1999) Diabetes care and patient oriented outcomes. JAMA 281:1676-1679
5. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D (1999) Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? BMJ 318:318-322
6. Domenighetti G (2000) Impact of "information factor" on demand for screening. Position paper prepared for the British National Screening Committee, April 2000
7. Elmore JG, Barton MB, Moceri VM, Polk S, Arena PJ, Fletcher SW (1998) Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N Engl J Med 338:1089-1096
8. Fahey T, Griffiths S, Peters TJ (1995) Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews. BMJ 311:1056-1060
9. Forrow L, Taylor WC, Arnold RM (1992) Absolutely relative: how research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions. Am J Med 92:121-124
10. General Medical Council (1999) Protecting patients, guiding doctors. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. (http://www.gmc-uk.org), London
11. Gigerenzer G (2002) Calculated risk. What numbers really tell us about our lives. Simon & Schuster, New York
12. Gotzsche PC, Olsen O (2000) Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 355:129-134
13. Hoffrage U, Gigerenzer G (1998) Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Acad Med 73:538-540
14. Hoffrage U, Kurzenhäuser S, Gigerenzer (2000) Wie kann man die Bedeutung medizinischer Testbefunde besser verstehen? Z Ärztl Fortbild Qual Sich 94:713-719
15. Hoffrage U, Lindsey S, Hertwig R, Gigerenzer G (2000) Communicating statistical information. Science 290:2261-2262
16. Höldke B(2000) http://www.mammographie-screening-online.de
17. Junkermann H, Becker N, Peitgen HO (2001) Konzept und Durchführung der Modellprojekte für Mammographiescreening in Deutschland. Radiologe 41:328-336
18. Kavanagh AM, Mitchell H, Giles GG (2000) Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening. Lancet 355:270-274
19. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J et al. (1996) Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. JAMA 276:39-43
20. Matter-Walstra K, Hoffrage U (2001) Individuelle Entscheidungsfindung am Beispiel der Brustkrebs-Früherkennung. Managed Care 3:26-29
21. Mühlhauser I (2001) Mammographiescreening. Schweiz Ärztez 82:571-572
22. Mühlhauser I, Höldke B (1999) Mammographie-Screening - Darstellung der wissenschaftlichen Evidenz - Grundlage zur Kommunikation mit der Frau.arznei-telegramm, pp 101-108
23. Mühlhauser I, Höldke B (2000) Mammogrpahie-Screening: Darstellung der wissenschaftlichen Evidenz als Grundlage zur Kommunikation mit der Frau. Z Ärztl Fortbild Qual Sich 94:721-731
24. Mühlhauser I, Höldke B (2000) Mammographie. Brustkrebs-Früherkennungs-Untersuchung. Kirchheim, Mainz
25. Muir-Gray JA (1997) Evidence-based healthcare. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
26. Mushlin Al, Konides RW, Shapiro DE (1998) Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 14:143-153
27. Nyström L, Larsson LG, Wall S et al. (1996) An overview of the Swedish randomised mammography trials: total mortality pattern and the representivity of the study cohorts. J Med Screening 3:85-87
28. Olsen O, Gotzsche PC (2001) Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 358:1340-1342
29. Olsen O, Gotzsche PC (2001) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. http://image.thelancet.com/lancet/extra/fullreport.pdf
30. Olsen O, Gotzsche PC (2001) Screening for breast cancer with mammography. In: Cochrane Library, issue 4. Update Software, Oxford
31. Otten J, van Dijck J, Peer P et al.(1996) Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, the Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92. J Epidemiol Community Health 50:353-358
32. Peer P, Verbeek A, Straatman H et al. (1996) Age-specific sensitivities of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 38:153-160, 734-739
33. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyett GH, Tugwell P (1991) Clinical epidemiology. A basic science for clinical medicine, 2nd ed. Little, Brown & Company, Boston Toronto London
34. Slaytor E, Ward JE (1998) How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets. BMJ 17:263-265