How did the endoscopic video camera change our practice in transurethral resection of the prostate? A retrospective study of 200 cases

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 763-765

  Nouira, Yassine ^a   Kbaier, Imed ^a   Attyaoui, Fethi ^a   Horchani, Ali ^a  

^a LA RABTA HOSPITAL   (Tunisia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFERENCE PAPER; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; URETHRA STRICTURE;

EID: 0036939065     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/08927790260472935     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Muir GH, Davis JH. Video-resection does not stop corneal contamination during transurethral resection of the prostate. Br J Urol 1996;77:836-838.
2. Einarsson OJ, Lyrdal F, Neidhardt FO. The 'shrinkage' of the prostate during transurethral resection. Br J Urol 1983;55:38-41.
3. Widran J. Video transurethral resection using controlled continuous flow resectoscope. Urology 1988;31:382-386.
4. Faul P. Video TURP: Raising the gold standard: New aspects, techniques and tendencies to minimize invasiveness. Eur Urol 1993;24: 256-261.