Understanding the battered woman who kills her violent partner — The admissibility of expert evidence of domestic violence in Australia

Psychiatry, Psychology and Law

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 177-199

  Bradfield, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; BATTERED WOMAN; DEFENSIVE BEHAVIOR; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; HUMAN; REVIEW;

EID: 0036935343     PISSN: 13218719     EISSN: 19341687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1375/pplt.2002.9.2.177     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. I Leader-Elliott, “Battered but Not Beaten: Women Who Kill in Self Defence” (1993) 15 Sydney Law Review 403;
2. R Bradfield, “Is near Enough Good Enough? Why Isn’t Self-Defence Appropriate for the Battered Woman?” (1998) 5 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 71
3. S Tarrant, “Something is Pushing them to the Side of their Own Lives: A Feminist Critique of Law and Laws” (1990) 20 University of Western Australia Law Review 573.
4. M Dutton, “The Dynamics of Domestic Violence: Understanding the Response from Battered Woman” (1994) 68 Florida Bar Journal 24 at 24.
5. M Aronson & J Hunter, Litigation: Evidence and Procedure (6th ed, Butterworths, Australia, 1998), p. 673.
6. I Freckelton, “Judicial Pedagogy and Expert Evidence on Victims” Responses to Trauma” (1997) 4 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 79 at 85.
7. R Schopp et al., “Battered Woman Syndrome, Expert Testimony, and the Distinction between Justification and Excuse” (1994) 1 University of Illinois Law Review 45 at 93.
8. E Schneider, Battered Women and Feminist Lawmaking (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2000), p. 125.
9. E Schneider, “Equal Rights to Trial for Women: Sex Bias in the Law of Self-Defence” (1980) 15 Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review 623 at 636
10. P Easteal, “Battered Woman Syndrome What is Reasonable?” (1992) 17 Alternative Law Journal 220
11. E Sheehy et al., “Defending Battered Women on Trial: The Battered Woman Syndrome and its Limitations” (1992) 16 Criminal Law Journal 369
12. J Stubbs, “Battered Woman Syndrome: An Advance for Women or Further Evidence of the Legal System’s Inability to Comprehend Women’s Experience” (1991) 3 Current Issues in Criminal Justice 267
13. J Stubbs, “The (Un)Reasonable Battered Woman? A Response to Easteal” (1992) 3 Current Issues in Criminal Justice 359
14. M Shaffer, “The Battered Woman Syndrome Revisited: Some Complicating Thoughts Five Years after R v Lavallee” (1997) 47 University of Toronto Law Journal 1
15. E Schneider, “Describing and Changing: Women’s Self-Defence Work and the Problem of Expert Testimony on Battering” (1985) 9 Women’s Rights Law Reporter 195
16. E Schneider, “Particularity and Generality: Challenges of Feminist Theory and Practice in Work on Woman-Abuse” (1992) 67 New York University Law Review 520
17. M Mahoney, “Legal Images of Battered Women: Refining the Issue of Separation” (1991) 90 Michigan Law Review 1
18. M Mahoney, “Victimization or Oppression? Women’s Lives, Violence & Agency”, in M Fineman & R Mykitiuk (eds), The Public Nature of Private Violence (Routledge, New York, 1994)
19. M Dutton, “Understanding Women’s Responses to Domestic Violence: A Redefinition of Battered Woman Syndrome” (1993) 21 Hofstra Law Review 1191;
20. M Dutton, “Validity of “Battered Woman Syndrome” in Criminal Cases Involving Battered Women”, in US Department of Justice and US Department of Health and Human Services (ed), Validity and Use of Evidence Concerning Battering and its Effects in Criminal Trials, Washington, 1996
21. N Seuffert, “Battered Woman Syndrome and Self-Defence” (1997) 17 New Zealand Universities Law Review 292.
22. I Freckelton, “Contemporary Comment: When Plight Makes Right the Forensic Abuse Syndrome” (1994) 18 Criminal Law Journal 29
23. J Parish, “Trend Analysis: Expert Testimony on Battering and Its Effects in Criminal Cases”, in US Department of Justice and US Department of Health and Human Services (ed) Validity and Use of Evidence Concerning Battering and Its Effects in Criminal Trials, (Washington, 1996)
24. J Tolmie, “Provocation or Self-Defence for Battered Women who Kill”, in S Yeo (ed), Partial Excuses to Murder, (The Federation Press, Sydney, 1991), p. 73
25. C Ewing & M Aubry, “Battered Women and Public Opinion: Some Realities about the Myths” (1987) 2 Journal of Family Violence 257
26. D Follingstad et al., “Factors Predicting Verdicts in Cases where Battered Women Kill their Husbands” (1989) 13 Law and Human Behaviour 253
27. N Finkel et al., “The Self-Defence Defence and Community Sentiment” (1991) 15 Law and Human Behaviour 585
28. M Keasian et al., “Battered Women Who Kill: Jury Simulation and Legal Defences” (1993) 17 Law and Human Behavior 289
29. R Schuller, “The Impact of Battered Woman Syndrome Testimony on Jury Decision-making: Lavallee v R Reconsidered” (1990) 10 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 105
30. R Schuller & N Vidmar, “Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence in the Courtroom: A Review of the Literature” (1992) 16 Law and Human Behavior 273
31. R Schuller et al., “Jurors Decisions in Trials of Battered Women Who Kill: The Role of Prior Beliefs and Expert Testimony” (1994) 24 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 316
32. R Schuller & P Hastings, “Trial of Battered Women Who Kill: The Impact of Alternative Forms of Expert Evidence” (1996) 20 Law and Human Behavior 167
33. R Schuller & J Cripps, “Expert Evidence Pertaining to Battered Women: The Impact of Gender of Expert and Timing of Testimony” (1998) 22 Law and Human Behavior 17
34. N Vidmar & R Schuller, “Juries and Expert Evidence: Social Framework Testimony” (1989) 52 Law and Contemporary Problems 133
35. M Dodge & E Greene, “Juror and Expert Conceptions of Battered Women” (1991) 6 Violence and Victims 271
36. C Terrance et al., “Effects of Judicial Instructions and Case Characteristics in a Mock Jury Trial of Battered Women who Kill” (2000) 24 Law and Human Behavior 207.
37. C Terrance et al., “Effects of Judicial Instructions and Case Characteristics in a Mock Jury Trial of Battered Women who Kill” (2000) 24 Law and Human Behavior 213.
38. C Terrance et al. “Effects of Judicial Instructions and Case Characteristics in a Mock Jury Trial of Battered Women who Kill” (2000) 24 Law and Human Behavior 222.
39. R Schuller, “The Impact of Battered Woman Syndrome Evidence on Jury Decision Processes”, op cit n 50
40. R Schuller et al., “Jurors’ Decisions in Trials of Battered Women Who Kill”, op cit n 50
41. D Indermaur et al., Young People’s Attitudes to and Experiences of Domestic Violence, The Way Forward: Children, Young People and Domestic Violence (Partnerships against Domestic Violence, Melbourne, 2000), p. 180
42. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs et al., Young People and Domestic Violence: National Research on Young People’s Attitudes and Experiences of Domestic Violence, Full Report, 2001.
43. R Busch, “Don’t Throw Bouquets at Me.(Judges) Will Say We’re in Love” An Analysis of New Zealand Judges’ Attitudes Towards Domestic Violence”, in J Stubbs (ed), Women Male Violence and the Law (Institute of Criminology, Sydney, 1994), p. 106.
44. M Mahoney, “Victimization or Oppression?”, op cit n 29, p. 75. pp. 77–79.
45. J Stubbs & J Tolmie, “Feminisms, SelfDefence, and Battered Women: A Response to Hubble’s ‘straw Feminist’” (1998) 10 Current Issues in Criminal Justice 73
46. J Tolmie, “Pacific-Asian Immigrant and Refugee Women Who Kill their Batterers: Telling Stories that Illustrate the Significance of Specificity” (1997) 19 Sydney Law Review 472
47. J Stubbs & J Tolmie, “Race, Gender and the Battered Woman Syndrome: An Australian Case Study” (1995) 8 Canadian Journal of Women and Law 122.
48. New Zealand Law Commission, Some Criminal Defences with Particular Reference to Battered Defendants, Report 73 (Wellington, 2001) p. 6.
49. B Hocking, “Limited (and Gendered?) Concessions to Human Frailty: Frightened Women, Angry Men and the Law of Provocation” (1999) 6 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 57 at 63.
50. E Pence & M Paymar, Education Groups for Men who Batter (Springer Publishing, New York, 1993), p. 2.
51. E Hore et al., Domestic Homicide (Family Court of Australia, Victoria, 1996), p. 45
52. A Wallace, Homicide: The Social Reality (NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney, 1986), p. 99
53. J Mouzos, Femicide: An Overview of Major Findings Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No 124 (Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 1999).
54. R Busch et al., Protection from Family Violence: A Study of Protection Orders Under the Domestic Protection Act (Victims Task Force, Wellington, 1992).
55. J Mouzos, Femicide: The Killing of Women in Australia 1989 1998 Research and Public Policy Series No 18 (Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 1999), pp. 20–21
56. C Carcach & M James, Homicide between Intimate Partners in Australia Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice No 90 (Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, 1998), p. 6.
57. L Ratushny, Self-Defence Review (Minister for Justice, Canada, 1997), p. 23.
58. New Zealand Law Commission, Battered Defendants: Victims of Domestic Violence Who Offend, Preliminary Article 41 (Wellington, 2000), p. 10.
59. J Heydon, Cross on Evidence (6th Australian ed, Butterworths, Australia, 2000), pp. 529–530.
60. H Maguigan, “Battered Woman Syndrome and Self-Defence: Myths and Misconceptions in Current Reform Proposals” (1991) 140 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 379 at 383.
61. A Ligertwood, Australian Evidence (Butterworths, Australia, 1998), pp. 446–449.
62. I Freckelton, “Judicial Attitudes Towards Scientific Evidence: The Antipodean Experience” (1997) 20 UC Davis Law Review 1137.
63. J Stubbs & J Tolmie, “Falling Short of the Challenge?”, op cit n 18 at 717
64. M Dutton, “Impact of Evidence Concerning Battering and its Effects”, op cit n 29 at 10.