Results of a survey concerning laparoscopic surgery among German urologists;Ergebnisse der bundesweiten datenerhebung über die urologische laparoskopie

Urologe - Ausgabe A

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 120-122

  Vogeli T A ^a   Burchardt, M ^a   Sulser, T ^b   Fornara, P ^c   Rassweiler, J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

^b Urologische Klinik Universitatsspital Basel   (Switzerland)

^c MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^d Urology Dept   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acceptance level of laparoscopy; Laparoscopy endoscopy; Surgical frequency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CRYPTORCHISM; DATA ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; EVALUATION; GERMANY; HUMAN; INVESTMENT; KIDNEY CANCER; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LEARNING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NEPHRECTOMY; NORMAL HUMAN; PROSTATECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT INDICATION; UROLOGY; VARICOCELE;

EID: 0036933719     PISSN: 03402592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-002-0188-0     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Hopkins MP (2000) The myths of laparoscopic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183: 1-5
2. Johns DA, Carrera B, Jones J, DeLeon F, Vincent R, Safely C (1995) The medical and economic impact of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a large, metropolitan, not-for-profit hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 172: 1709-1715
3. Miller K (1996) Laparoskopische Operationen an urologischen Klinken-Ergebnisse einer Umfrage. Urologe A 35: 223-225
4. Stadulis LH, Rom CD, Powell JL (1999) Compliacations of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Gynecol Tech 5: 119-23
5. Sultana CJ, Sogor L (1996) Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for gynecologic procedures: impact on resident training. J Reprod Med 41: 225-30
6. Summit RL Jr, Stovall TG, Steege JF, Lipscomb GH (1998) A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates. Obstet Gynecol 92: 321-31