Visual exploration and incremental utility elicitation

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 526-532

  Blythe, Jim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FEEDBACK; FUNCTIONS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING;

VISUAL EXPLORATION;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 0036929058     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Ahlberg, C., and Shneiderman, B. 1994. Visual information seeking: Tight coupling of dynamic query filters with starfield displays. In Human Factors in Computing Systems. Conference Proceedings CHI'94, 313-317.
2. Anderson, D.; Anderson, E.; Lesh, N.; Marks, J.; Mirtich, B.; Ratajczak, D.; and Ryall, K. 2000. Human-guided simple search. In Proc. Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press.
3. Blythe, J.; Kim, J.; Ramachandran, S.; and Gil, Y. 2001. An integrated environment for knowledge acquisition. In Proc. Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces.
4. Chajewska, U.; Getoor, L.; Norman, J.; and Shahar, Y. 1998. Utility elicitation as a classification problem. In Proc. Fourtheenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 79-88. Madison, Wisconsin: Morgan Kaufmann.
5. Chajewska, U.; Koller, D.; and Parr, R. 2000. Making rational decisions using adaptive utility elicitation. In Proc. Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 363-369. AAAI Press.
6. Ferguson, G.; Allen, J.; and Miller, B. 1996. Trains-95: Towards a mixed-initiative planning assistant. In Drabble, B., ed., Proc. Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems. University of Edinburgh: AAAI Press.
7. Ha, V., and Haddawy, P. 1997. Problem-focused incremental elicitation of multi-attribute utility models. In Besnard, P., and Hanks, S., eds., Proc. Thirteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 215-222. Providence, Rhode Island: Morgan Kaufmann.
8. Keeney, R., and Raiffa, H. 1993. Decisions With Multiple Objectives. The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Linden, G.; Hanks, S.; and Lesh, N. 1997. Interactive assessment of user preference models: The automated travel assistant. Sixth International Conference on User Modelling.
10. Marks, J.; Andalman, B.; Beardsley, P.; Freeman, W.; Gibson, S.; Hodgins, J.; and T.Kang. 1997. Design galleries: A general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH, 389-400.
11. Myers, K. 1996. Strategic advice for hierarchical planners. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Representation.
12. Noether, G. E. 1986. Why kendall tau? In Best of Teaching Statistics. Teaching Statistics. available at http://science.ntu.ac.uk/rsscse/TS/bts/noether/text.html.
13. Pu, P., and Faltings, B. 2000. Enriching buyers' experiences: the smartclient approach. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 289-296.
14. Spielman, D., and Teng, S.-H. 2001. Smoothed analysis: Why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time. In The Thirty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 296-305.
15. von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. 1967. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton University Press, 3rd edition.