Optimal time window for measurement of renal output paramaters

Nuclear Medicine Review

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 105-108

  Kuyvenhoven, Jacob D ^a,b   Ham, Hamphrey R ^a   Piepsz, Amy ^a  

^a SAINT PIERRE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

NORA; Output efficiency; Renography; Simulation study

Indexed keywords

FUROSEMIDE;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY FUNCTION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEASUREMENT; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RENOGRAPHY; SIMULATION; TIME; URINE RETENTION; URINE VOLUME;

EID: 0036927189     PISSN: 15069680     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Whitfield HN, Britton KE, Nimmon CC, Hendry WF, Wallace DMA, Wickham JEA. Renal transit time measurements in the diagnosis of ureteric obstruction. Br J Urol 1981; 53: 500-503.
2. Piepsz A, Ham HR, Erbsmann F et al. A co-operative study on the clinical value of dynamic renal scanning with deconvolution analysis. Br J Radiol 1982; 55: 419-433.
3. Russell CD, Japanwalla M, Khan S, Scott JW, Dubovsky EV. Techniques for measuring renal transit time. Eur J Nucl Med 1995; 22: 1372-1378.
4. Ham HR. Is renography suitable for deconvolution analysis? J Nucl Med 1996; 37: 403-404.
5. Piepsz A, Tondeur M, Ham H. NORA: A simple and reliable parameter for estimating renal output with or without frusemide challenge. Nucl Med Commun 2000; 21: 317-323.
6. Chaiwatanarat T, Padhy AK, Bomanji JB, Nimmon CC, Somezoglu K, Britton KE. Validation of renal output efficiency as an objective quantitative parameter in the evaluation of upper urinary tract obstruction. J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 845-848.
7. Gordon I, Colarinha P, Fettich J et al. Guidelines for standard and diuretic renography in children. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28: BP21-30.
8. Spicer ST, Chi KK, Nankivell BJ et al. Mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic renography and output efficiency in renal transplant patients. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 152-154.