Archaeology and 'QAA subject review': What did we learn?

Antiquity

Volumn 76, Issue 294, 2002, Pages 967-974

  Harding, Anthony ^a   Johnson, Matthew ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; QAA; Teaching; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGY; TEACHING;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0036926352     PISSN: 0003598X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00091778     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. AUSTIN, D. 1996. Reflections of an ex-assessor, Antiquity 70: 253-5.
2. BATY, P. 2002. Hodge calls the shots, Times Higher Education Supplement 22 February.
3. BUNDY, C. 2002. Opinion, Guardian Education 26 march: 15.
4. CHIPPINDALE, C. 2001. What's the score? Times Higher Education Supplement 29 June.
5. HALSTEAD, P. 2001. Audit or educate? Archaeological reflections on a world gone mad, in Rainbird & Hamilakis (ed.): 113-14.
6. HAMILAKIS, Y. 2001. Interrogating archaeological pedagogies, in Rainbird & Hamilakis (ed.): 5-14.
7. MALONE, C. 2000. Editorial, Antiquity 74: 741-8.
8. NUTHALL, K., R. WARDEN & D. JOBBINS. 2002. EU close to fixing quality standard, The Times Higher Education Supplement, 1 March.
9. RAINBIRD, P. & Y. HAMILAKIS (ed.) 2001. Interrogating pedagogies: archaeology in higher education, Oxford: Archaeopress. British Archaeological Reports. International series S948.
10. SHORE, C. & S. WRIGHT. 1999. Audit culture and anthropology: neo-liberalism in British higher education, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute n.s. 5: 557-75.
11. WEITZMAN, D. 2001. Settling the score, Times Higher Education Supplement 6 July.