Brain potentials elicited by prose-embedded linguistic anomalies

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1304-1312

  Osterhout, Lee ^a   Allen, Mark D ^a   McLaughlin, Judith ^a   Inoue, Kayo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LINGUISTICS; NORMAL HUMAN; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0036924091     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03213412     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. ALLEN, M., BADECKER, W., & OSTERHOUT, L. (in press). Syntactic features are analyzed independently of their hosts. Language & Cognitive Processes.
2. ANGRILLI, A., PENOLAZZI, B., VESPIGNANI, F., DE VINCENZI, M., JOB, R., CICCARELLI, L., PALOMBA, D., & STEGAGNO, L. (2002). Cortical brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 322, 5-8.
3. CHOMSKY, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
4. DONCHIN, E. (1981). Surprise!...Surprise? Psychophysiology, 30, 90-97.
5. FERREIRA, F., & CLIFTON, C., JR. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 348-368.
6. FRAZIER, L., & RAYNER, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
7. FRIEDERICI, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain & Language, 62, 311-341.
8. FRIEDERICI, A. D., HAHNE, A., & MECKLINGER, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic processing: Early and late event-related potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1219-1248.
9. HAGOORT, P., & BROWN, C. M. (1994). Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 45-80). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. HAGOORT, P., & BROWN, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1531-1549.
11. HAGOORT, P., BROWN, C., & GROOTHUSEN, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of sentence processing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 439-483.
12. HAGOORT, P., BROWN, C., & OSTERHOUT, L. (1999). The neural architecture of syntactic processing. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Neurocognition of language (pp. 273-316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. HOLCOMB, P. J., & NEVILLE, H. J. (1991). Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials. Psychobiology, 19, 286-300.
14. JASPER, H. H. (1958). Report to the committee on the methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.
15. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. KENAN, L. R. (1998). New American profiles. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.
17. KEPPEL, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. KUTAS, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 533-572.
19. KUTAS, M., & HILLVARD, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205.
20. KUTAS, M., & HILLYARD, S. A. (1983). Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies. Memory & Cognition, 11, 539-550.
21. KUTAS, M., & HILLYARD, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163.
22. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., & TYLER, L. K. (1987). Against modularity. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding (pp. 37-62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. MCCLELLAND, J. L., ST. JOHN, M., & TARABAN, R. (1989). Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4, 287-336.
24. MCKINNON, R., & OSTERHOUT, L. (1996). Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11, 495-523.
25. MÜNTE, T. F., HEINZE, H.-J., & MANGUN, G. R. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 335-344.
26. MONTE, T. F., HEINZE, H.-J., MATZKE, M., WIERINGA, B. M., & JOHANNES, S. (1998). Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift. Neuropsychologia, 36, 217-226.
27. NEVILLE, H. J., NICOL, J. L., BARSS, A., FORSTER, K. I., & GARRETT, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based processing classes: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 151-165.
28. OSTERHOUT, L. (1997). On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain & Language, 59, 494-522.
29. OSTERHOUT, L., & HAGOORT, P. (1999). A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family: Counterarguments to Coulson, King, and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 1-14.
30. OSTERHOUT, L., & HOLCOMB, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 785-806.
31. OSTERHOUT, L., & HOLCOMB, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 413-438.
32. OSTERHOUT, L., HOLCOMB, P. J., & SWINNEY, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 786-803.
33. OSTERHOUT, L., MCKINNON, R., BERSICK, M., & COREY, V. (1996). On the language-specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Is the syntactic positive shift a member of the P300 family? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 507-526.
34. OSTERHOUT, L., MCLAUGHLIN, J., ALLEN, M., INOUE, K., & LOVELESS, J. (2002). Changes in brain activity associated with the first year of adult foreign-language instruction. Manuscript in preparation.
35. OSTERHOUT, L., MCLAUGHLIN, J., & BERSICK, M. (1997). Event-related potentials and human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1,203-209.
36. OSTERHOUT, L., & MOBLEY, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 739-773.
37. OSTERHOUT, L., & NICOL, J. (1999). On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14, 283-317.
38. RÖSLER, F., FRIEDERICI, A. D., PÜTZ, P., & HAHNE, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations. Journal Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 345-362.