Comparison of five bilevel pressure ventilators in patients with chronic ventilatory failure: A physiologic study

Chest

Volumn 122, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 2105-2114

  Vitacca, Michele ^a   Barbano, Luca ^a   D'Anna, Silvestro ^a   Porta, Roberto ^a   Bianchi, Luca ^a   Ambrosino, Nicolino ^a  

^a IRCCS   (Italy)

Author keywords

Breathing pattern; COPD; Hypercapnia; Noninvasive mechanical ventilation; Respiratory failure; Respiratory muscles; Restrictive chest wall disease

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ASSISTED VENTILATION; BREATHING MECHANICS; BREATHING PATTERN; BRONCHUS MUSCLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DISEASE DURATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HOME CARE; HUMAN; LUNG INSUFFICIENCY; LUNG MINUTE VOLUME; LUNG PRESSURE; LUNG VENTILATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THORAX WALL DEFECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTILATOR; WAVEFORM;

EID: 0036923992     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.6.2105     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Mehta S, Hill NS. Noninvasive ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163:540-577
2. Rossi A, Hill NS. Pro-con debate: Noninvasive ventilation has been shown to be effective/ineffective in stable COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161:688-691
3. Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PMA, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: NHLBI/WHO global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163:1256-1276
4. Nava S, Ambrosino N, Rubini F, et al. Effect of nasal pressure support ventilation and external PEEP on diaphragmatic activity in patients with severe stable COPD. Chest 1993; 103:143-150
5. Vitacca M, Nava S, Confalonieri M, et al. The appropriate setting of noninvasive pressure support ventilation in stable COPD patients. Chest 2000; 118:1286-1293
6. Criner GJ, Brennan K, Travaline JM, et al. Efficacy and compliance with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with chronic respiratory failure. Chest 1999; 116:667-675
7. Bunburaphong T, Imanaka H, Nishimura M, et al. Performance characteristics of bilevel pressure ventilators: A lung model study. Chest 1997; 111:1050-1060
8. Lofaso F, Brochard L, Hang T, et al. Home vs intensive care pressure support devices: Experimental and clinical comparison. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 153:1591-1599
9. Smith IE, Shneerson JM. A laboratory comparison of four positive pressure ventilators used in the home. Eur Respir J 1996; 9:2410-2415
10. Mehta S, McCool FD, Hill NS. Leak compensation in positive pressure ventilators: A lung model study. Eur Respir J 2001; 17:259-267
11. Highcock MP, Shneerson JM, Smith IE. Functional differences in bi-level pressure preset ventilators. Eur Respir J 2001; 17:268-273
12. Meecham Jones DJ, Wedzicha JA. Comparison of pressure and volume preset nasal ventilator systems in stable chronic respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 1993; 6:1060-1064
13. American College of Chest Physicians. Clinical indications for noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in chronic respiratory failure due to restrictive lung disease, COPD, and nocturnal hypoventilation: A consensus conference report. Chest 1999; 116:521-534
14. American Thoracic Society. Standards for the diagnosis and care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 152:S77-S120
15. European Respiratory Society. Official statement of the European Respiratory Society: Standardized lung function testing. Eur Respir J 1993; 6:1-100
16. Quanjer PH. Working party on standardization of lung function test. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1983; 19(suppl):7-10
17. Aitken RCB. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 1969; 62:989-993
18. Ferguson T, Gilmartin M. CO2 rebreathing during BiPAP ventilatory assistance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151:1126-1135
19. Appendini L, Patessio A, Zanaboni S, et al. Physiological effects of positive end expiratory pressure and mask pressure support during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994; 149:1069-1076
20. Tobin MJ, Van de Graaff WB. Monitoring of lung mechanics and work of breathing. In: Tobin MJ, ed. Principles and practice of mechanical ventilation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994; 967-1003
21. Nava S, Bruschi C, Rubini F, et al. Respiratory response and inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation in COPD patients. Intensive Care Med 1995; 21:871-879
22. Baydur A, Behrakis K, Zin WA, et al. A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 126:788-791
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310
24. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: Why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346:1085-1087
25. Tobin MJ. Advances in mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1986-1996
26. Navalesi P, Fanfulla F, Frigerio P, et al. Physiologic evaluation of noninvasive mechanical ventilation delivered with three types of masks in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:1785-1790
27. Meecham Jones DJ, Braid GM, Wedzicha JA. Nasal masks for domiciliary positive pressure ventilation: Patient usage and complications. Thorax 1994; 49:811-812
28. Hill NS. Noninvasive ventilation: Does it work, for whom, and how? Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 147:1050-1055
29. Tobin MJ, Jubran A, Laghi F. Patient-ventilator interaction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163:1059-1063
30. Ambrosino N, Nava S, Torbicki A, et al. Haemodynamic effects of pressure support and PEEP ventilation by nasal route in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1993; 48:523-528