Contentful mental states for robot baby

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 126-131

  Cohen, Paul R ^a   Oates, Tim ^b   Beal, Carole R ^c   Adams, Niall ^d  

^a Biologically Inspired Neural and Dynamical Systems Laboratory   (United States)

^b University of Marylandw Baltimore County   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA REDUCTION;

ROBOT BABY;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0036923113     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Agre, P. E., and Chapman, D. 1987. Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity. In Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 268-272. American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
2. Ballard, D. H.; Hayhoe, M. M.; and Pook, P. K. 1997. Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Computer Science Department, University of Rochester.
3. Bloom, P. 2000. Haw Children Learn the Meanings of Words. MIT Press.
4. Cohen, P. R., and Litch, M. 1999. What are contentful mental states? dretske's theory of mental content viewed in the light of robot learning and planning algorithms. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
5. de Boysson-Bardies, B. 2001. How Language Comes to Children. MIT Press.
6. Dennett, D. 1998. Do it yourself understanding. In Dennett, D., ed., Brainchildren, Essays on Designing Minds. MIT Press and Penguin.
7. Dretske, F. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge University Press. Reprinted by CSLI Publications, Stanford University.
8. Dretske, F. 1988. Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes. MIT Press.
9. Kruskall, J. B., and Liberman, M. 1983. The symmetric time warping problem: From continuous to discrete. In Time Warps, String Edits and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison. Addison-Wesley.
10. Kuipers, B. 2000. The spatial semantic hierarchy. Artificial Intelligence 119:191-233.
11. Lakoff, G. 1984. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press.
12. Lenat, D. B., and Guha, R. V. 1990. Building large knowledge-based systems: Representation and inference in the Cyc project. Addison Wesley.
13. Lenat, D. B. 1990. Cyc: Towards programs with common sense. Communications of the ACM 33(8).
14. Matthew Schmill, Tim Gates, P. C. 2000. Learning planning operators in real-world, partially observable environments. In Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Artificial Planning and Scheduling, 246-253. AAAI Press.
15. Oates, J. T. 2001. PhD: Grounding Knowledge in Sensors: Unsupervised Learning for Language and Planning. Ph.D. Dissertation, Affiliation removed for blind review.
16. Paul R. Cohen, Marc S. Atkin, T. O., and Seal, C. R. 1997. NEO: Learning conceptual knowledge by sensorimotor interaction with an environment. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 170-177.
17. Pierce, D., and Kuipers, B. 1997. Map learning with uninterpreted sensors and effectors. Artificial Intelligence Journal 92:169-229.
18. Rosch, E., and Mervis, C. B. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7:573-605.
19. Steels, L. 1999. The Talking Heads Experiment: Volume I. Words and Meanings. Laboratorium, Antwerpen. This is a museum catalog but is in preparation as a book.
20. Tim Oates, Matthew Schmill, P. C. 2000a. Identifying qualitatively different outcomes of actions: Gaining autonomy through learning. In Proceedings Fourth International Conference, pp 110-111. ACM.
21. Tim Gates, Matthew Schmill, P. C. 2000b. A method for clustering the experience of a mobile robot that accords with human judgments. In Proceedings of Seventeenth National Conference, pp. 846-851. AAAI Press/The MIT Press.
22. Utgoff, P., and Cohen, P. R. 1998. Applicability of reinforcement learning. In The Methodology of Applying Machine leraning Problem Definition, Task Decompostion and Technique Selection Workshop, ICML-98, 37-43.