Bridging research and practice: The challenge of 'normal operations' studies

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 173-180

  Bourrier, Mathile ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRISIS MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; ORGANIZATIONAL FRAMEWORK;

EID: 0036921888     PISSN: 09660879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.00194     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Amalberti, R. (1996), La Conduite de Systèmes à Risques, Collection le Travail Humain, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
2. Becker, G. (1998), From Theory to Practice - on the Difficulties of Improving Human-factors Learning from Events in an Inhospitable Environment, in: Misumi, J. Wilpert, B. Miller, R. (Eds.), Nuclear Safety: a Human Factors Perspective, London, Taylor & Francis, 113-126.
3. Baumont, G. Bourrier, M. and Frischnekt (1998), State of the Art Report on Organizational Factors Influencing Safety, Report OCDE/NEA/CSNI/R (98) 17, August.
4. Bourdeaux, I. and Gilbert, C. (1999), Procédures de Retour d'Expérience, d'Apprentissage et de Vigilance Organisationnels, Opération Structurante de Recherche, Rapport de Fin de Recherche, 208 pp.
5. Bourrier, M. (1996), Organizing Maintenance Work at Two American Power Plants, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4, 2, 104-112.
6. Bourrier, M. (1998a), Constructing Organizational Reliability: the problem of Embeddedness and Duality, in Misumi, J. Wilpert, B. and Miller, R. (Eds.), Nuclear Safety: a Human Factors Perspective, London, Taylor & Francis, 25-48.
7. Bourrier, M. (1998b), Le Pouvoir ur les Régles: la Gestion des Procédures de Maintenance dans l'Industrie Nucléaire. Performances Humaines et Techniques, 94, 30-36.
8. Bourrier, M. (1999), Le Nucléaire à l'Epreuve de l'Organisation, Collection Le Travail Humain, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
9. Bourrier, M. (2001, Ed.), Organiser la Fiabilité, Paris, L'Harmattan.
10. Carroll, J. (1995), Incident Reviews in High-hazard Industries, Ind. Environ. Crisis Quarterly, 9, 175-197.
11. Duclos, D. (1991), L'Homme Face au Risque Technique, Paris, L'Harmattan.
12. Fahlbruch, B. and Wilpert, B., (in press), System Safety - An Emerging Field for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, in: C.L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chichester, Wiley & Sons.
13. Hale, A. Wilpert, B. and Freitag M. (1997), After the Event, From Accident to Organizational Learning, Oxford, Elsevier.
14. Hale, A. and Baram, M. (Eds.) (1998), Safety Management, the Challenge of Change, Oxford: Pergamon.
15. Heimann, C.F. (1997), Acceptable Risks, Politics, Policy, and Risky Technologies, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
16. Hermitte, M.-A. (1996), Le Sang et le Droit, Essai sur la Transfusion Sanguine, Paris, Seuil.
17. Hopkins, A. (1999), The Limits of Normal Accident Theory, Safety Science, 32, 93-102.
18. Jaspers, J. (1990), Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden, and France, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
19. Lagadec, P. (1992), Le Retour d'Expérience, Préventique, 44, mars-avril, 14-21.
20. Lagadec, P. (2001), Retour d'Expérience: Théorie et Pratique, Le Rapport de la Commission d'Enquête Britannique sur l'Encéphalopathie Spongiforme Bovine au Royaume-Uni entre 1986 et 1996, Cahiers du GIS Risques Collectifs et Situations de Crise, Publications de la MSH-Alpes.
21. La Porte, T. R. Roberts, K. and Rochlin, G. (1987), High Reliability Organizations: The research Challenge, revision of La Porte, T. R: 'High Reliability Organizations: The Problem and its research dimensions', Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California at Berkeley, Working Paper.
22. La Porte, T. R. and Consolini, P. (1991), Working in Practice but not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of 'High-Reliability Organizations', Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 19-47.
23. La Porte, T. R. and Keller, A. (1995), Assuring Institutional Constancy: Requisite for Managing Long-Lived Hazards, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California at Berkeley, Working Paper No. 95-3.
24. Landau, M. (1969), Redundancy, Rationality, and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap, Public Administration Review, 29, 346-357.
25. Lepage, C. (1998), On ne Peut Rien Faire Madame le Ministre, Paris, Albin Michel.
26. Nichols, E. and Wildavsky, A. (1987), Nuclear Power Regulation, Seeking Safety, Doing Harm, Regulation, 11, 45-53.
27. Pariès, J. (1999), Intervention au séminaire 'Retours d'Expérience, Apprentissages et Vigilances Organizationnels: Approches Croisées', Programme Risques Collectifs et Situations de Crise, C.N.R.S. (Paris), Actes de la 4ème séance, 21 janvier.
28. Perrow, C. (1984), Normal Accidents, Living with High-Risk Technologies, New York, NJ: Basic Books.
29. Rasmussen, J. (1989), Learning from experience, How? in: Leplat and De terssac (eds.) LesFacteurs Humains de la Fiabilité dans les Systèmes Complexes, Toulouse, Octares Editions, pp. 359-383.
30. Reason, J. (1987), The Age of Organizational Accident. Nuclear Engineering International, 18-19.
31. Reason, J. (1990), Human Error, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
32. Roberts, K. H. (1993), New Challenges to understanding Organizations, New York, NJ, Macmillan Publishing Co.
33. Rijpma, J. (1997), Complexity, Tight-Coupling and Reliability: Connecting Normal Accidents Theory and High Reliability Theory. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 5, 1, 15-23.
34. Rochlin, G. (1988), Technology and Adaptative Hierarchy: Formal and Informal Organization for Flight Operations in the U.S. Navy, Working-Paper N 88-18, Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
35. Rochlin, G. (1994), Reliable Organizations: Present Research and Future Directions, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4, 2, 55-60.
36. Rochlin, G. (1996b), Processus Informatique et Ouverture du Feu, Les Champs de Mars, 1, 128-145.
37. Sagan, S. (1993), The Limits of Safety, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
38. Setbon, M. (1993), Pouvoirs contre Sida, Paris, Seuil.
39. Svedung, I. and Rasmussen, J. (1998), Organisational Decision making and Risk Management under Pressure from fast Technological Change, in Safety Management, the Challenge of Change, A. Hale & M. Baram (Eds.), (pp 249-267), Oxford, U.K: Pergamon [earlier version 1996].
40. Turner, B. (1978), Man-Made Disasters, London, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2nd edition.
41. Vaughan, D. (1996), The Challenger Launch Decision, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
42. Vaughan, D. (1999), The dark side of organizations: mistake, misconduct, and disaster, Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 271-305.
43. Weick, K. (1993), The collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The mann Gulch Disaster, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628-652.
44. Weick, K. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Weick, K. (1996), Drop your tools: An Allegory for Organization Studies, Administration Science Quarterly, 41, 301-313.
46. Wildavsky, A. (1988), Searching for Safety, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.