The study on technologies for feature selection

Proceedings of 2002 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics

Volumn 2, Issue , 2002, Pages 689-693

  Zhao, Jun ^a,b   Wang, Guo Yin ^b   Wu, Zhong Fu ^a   Tang, Hong ^a   Li, Hua ^a  

^a CHONGQING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CHONGQING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

Author keywords

Feature selection; Filter model; System characteristics; Technologies; Wrapper model

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HEURISTIC METHODS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; ROUGH SET THEORY;

FEATURE SELECTION; FILTER MODEL; WRAPPER MODEL;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 0036921432     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. John G.H. et al. Irrelevant Features and the subset selection problem, Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on M.L., 1994, 121-129, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann
2. Almullim H. et al. Learning with many irrelevant features, Proc. of the 9th Nat. Conf. on A.I., 1991, 547-552, San Jose, CA: AAAI Press
3. Wu F.B. et al. An inductive learning method based on rough set theory expressed knowledge system. Control and Decision, 1999, 14(3): 206-211
4. Schlimmer J.C. et al. Efficiently inducing determinations: A complete and systematic search algorithm that uses optimal pruning, Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on M.L., 1993, 284-290, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann
5. Liu H. et al. A probabilistic approach to feature selection-a filter solution, Proc. of the 13th Int. Conf. on M.L., 1996, 319-327, San Francisco, CA: Morgaan Kaufmann
6. Brassard G. et al. Fundamentals of algorithms, 1996, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
7. Miao D.Q. et al. A heuristic algorithm of reduction for knowledge, Journal of Computer Research and Development, 1999, 36(6): 681-684
8. Yu H. et al. Rough set based knowledge reduction algorithms, Computer Science, 2001, 28(5, Special Edition): 31-34
9. Choubey S.K. et al. On Feature Selection and Effective Classifiers, J. of ASIS, 1998, 49(5): 423-434
10. Doak J. An evaluation of feature selection methods and their application to computer security, Techanical Report, Universitya of California, 1992
11. Pawlak Z. Rough Sets. Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data, 1991, Dordrecht: Kluwer
12. Kira K. et al. The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm, Proc. of the 10th Nat. Conf. on A.I., 1992, 129-134, MIT Press
13. Kononenko I. On biases in estimating multi-valued attributes, Proc. Of 14th Int. Joint Conf. On Artificial Intelligence, 1995, 1034-1040, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann
14. Koller D. et al. Toward optimal feature selection, Proc. of the 13th Int. Conf. on M.L., 1996, 284-292, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann
15. Weiss S.M. et al. Computer systems that learn, 1991, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann
16. Quilan J.R. Induction of decision trees, Machine Learning, 1986, 1: 81-106
17. Clark P. et al. The CN2 induction algorithm, Machine Learning, 1989, 3: 261-283
18. Quilan J.R. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning, 1992, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann
19. Chang L.Y. et al. An approach for attribute reduction and rule generation based on rough set theory, Journal of Software, 1999, 10(11): 1206-1211
20. Skowron A. et al.: The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems, Intelligent Decision Support-Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Set Theorem, 1992, 331-362, Dordrecht: Kluwe