Influence of cell fate mechanisms upon retinal mosaic formation: A modelling study

Development

Volumn 129, Issue 23, 2002, Pages 5399-5408

  Eglen, Stephen J ^a   Willshaw, David J ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cell death; Cell fate; Retinal mosaics

Indexed keywords

NOTCH RECEPTOR;

ARTICLE; CELL DEATH; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL MOTION; CELL POPULATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FISH; HYPOTHESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA DEVELOPMENT; RETINA GANGLION CELL; RETINA NERVE CELL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CELL DEATH; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; RECEPTORS, NOTCH; RETINA; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 0036920478     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/dev.00118     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Austin, C. P., Feldman, D. E., Ida, J. A. and Cepko, C. L. (1995). Verterbrate retinal ganglion cells are selected from competent progenitors by the action of Notch. Development 121, 3637-3650.
2. Bodnarenko, S. R. and Chalupa, L. M. (1993). Stratification of on and off ganglion cell dendrites depends on glutamate mediated afferent activity in the developing retina. Nature 364, 144-146.
3. Bryant, P. J. (1999). Filopodia: fickle fingers of cell fate? Curr. Biol. 9, R655-R657.
4. Clarke, P. G. H. (2002). Models of neuronal death in vertebrate development: from trophic interactions to network roles. In Modeling Neural Development (ed. A. van Ooyen). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (in press).
5. Collier, J. R., Monk, N. A. M., Maini, P. K. and Lewis, J. H. (1996). Pattern formation by lateral inhibition with feedback: a mathematical model of Delta-Notch intracellular signalling. J. Theor. Biol. 183, 429-446.
6. Cook, J. E. (1996). Spatial properties of retinal mosaics: an empirical evaluation of some existing measures. Vis. Neurosci. 13, 15-30.
7. Cook, J. E. and Chalupa, L. M. (2000). Retinal mosaics: new insights into an old concept. Trends Neurosci. 23, 26-34.
8. Diggle, P. J. (1983). Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. Academic Press.
9. Diggle, P. J. (1986). Displaced amacrine cells in the retina of a rabbit: analysis of a bivariate spatial point pattern. J. Neurosci. Methods 18, 115-125.
10. Eglen, S. J. and Willshaw, D. J. (2000). Estimating the influence of cell fate, mediated by lateral inhibition, upon the development of retinal mosaics. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12 Suppl. 11, 486.
11. Eglen, S. J., van Ooyen, A. and Willshaw, D. J. (2000). Lateral cell movement driven by dendritic interactions is sufficient to form retinal mosaics. Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 11, 103-118.
12. Eglen, S. J., Galli-Resta, L. and Reese, B. E. (2002). Theoretical models of retinal mosaic formation. In Modeling Neural Development (ed. A. van Ooyen). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (in press).
13. Famiglietti, E. V. and Kolb, H. (1976). Structural basis for ON- and OFF-center responses in retinal ganglion cells. Science 194, 193-195.
14. Fortune, S. J. (1987). A sweepline algorithm for Voronoi diagrams. Algorithmica 2, 153-172.
15. Frankfort, B. J. and Mardon, G. (2002). R8 development in the drosophila eye: a paradigm for neural selection and differentiation. Development 129, 1295-1306.
16. Galli-Resta, L. and Novelli, E. (2000). The effects of natural cell loss on the regularity of the retinal cholinergic arrays. J. Neurosci. 20:RC60, 1-5.
17. Galli-Resta, L., Novelli, E., Kryger, Z., Jacobs, G. H. and Reese, B. E. (1999). Modelling the mosaic organization of rod and cone photoreceptors with a minimal-spacing rule. Eur. J Neurosci. 11, 1461-1469.
18. Galli-Resta, L., Resta, G., Tan, S.-S. and Reese, B. E. (1997). Mosaics of Islet-1-expressing arnacrine cells assembled by short-range cellular interactions. J. Neurosci. 17, 7831-7838.
19. Goodyear, R., Holley, M. and Richardson, G. (1995). Hair and supporting-cell differentiation during the development of the avian inner ear. J. Comp. Neurol. 351, 81-93.
20. Honda, H., Tanemura, M. and Yoshida, A. (1990). Estimation of neuroblast numbers in insect neurogenesis using the lateral inhibition hypothesis of cell differentiation. Development 110, 1349-1352.
21. Ihaka, R. and Gentleman, R. (1996). R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5, 299-314.
22. Jeyarasasingam, G., Snider, C. J., Ratto, G. M. and Chatupa, L. M. (1998). Activity-regulated cell death contributes to the formation of on and off alpha ganglion cell mosaics. J. Comp. Neural. 394, 335-343.
23. Kirby, M. A. and Steineke, T. C. (1996). Morphogenesis of retinal ganglion cells: a model of dendritic, mosaic, and foveal development. Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol. 3, 177-194.
24. Lohmann, C. and Wong, R. O. L. (2001). Cell-type specific dendritic contacts between retinal ganglion cells during development. J. Neurobiol. 48, 150-162.
25. McCabe, K. L., Gunther, E. C. and Reh, T. A. (1999). The development of the pattern of retinal ganglion cells in the chick retina: mechanisms that control differentiation. Development 126, 5713-5724.
26. Mochizuki, A. (2002). Pattern formation of cone mosaic in zebrafish retina: a cell rearrangement model. J. Theor. Biol. 215, 345-361.
27. O'Leary, D. D. M., Fawcett, J. W. and Cowan, W. M. (1986). Topographic targeting errors in the retinocollicular projection and their elimination by ganglion cell death. J. Neurosci. 6, 3692-3705.
28. Peichl, L. (1991). Alpha ganglion cells in mammalian retinae: common properties, species differences, and some comments on other ganglion cells. Vis. Neurosci. 7, 155-169.
29. Reese, B. E., Harvey, A. R. and Tan, S.-S. (1995). Radial and tangential dispersion patterns in the mouse retina are cell-class specific. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 2494-2498.
30. Rodieck, R. W. (1991). The density recovery profile: a method for the analysis of points in the plane applicable to retinal studies. Vis. Neurosci. 6, 95-111.
31. Tanemura, M., Honda, H. and Yoshida, A. (1991). Distribution of differentiated cells in a cell sheet under the lateral inhibition rule of differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 153, 287-300.
32. Tohya, S., Mochizuki, A. and Iwasa, Y. (1999). Formation of cone mosaic of zebratish retina. J. Theor. Biol. 200, 231-244.
33. von Dassow, G., Meir, E., Munro, E. M. and Odell, G. M. (2000). The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406, 188-192.
34. Waid, D. K. and McLoon, S. C. (1998). Ganglion cells influence the fate of dividing retinal cells in culture. Development 125, 1059-1066.
35. Wässle, H., Peichl, L. and Boycott, B. B. (1981a). Morphology and topography of on-alpha and off-alpha cells in the cat retina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 212, 157-175.
36. Wässle, H., Boycott, B. B. and Illing, R. B. (1981b). Morphology and mosaic of on-beta and off-beta cells in the cat retina and some functional considerations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 212, 177-195.
37. Wässle, H. and Riemann, H. J. (1978). The mosaic of nerve cells in the mammalian retina. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 200, 441-461.
38. Zhan, X. J. and Troy, J. B. (2000). Modeling cat retinal beta-cell arrays. Vis. Neurosci. 17, 23-39.