The centrality of the clinician in the evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytologic studies

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 187, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1533-1535

  Noller, Kenneth L ^a   Bibace, Roger ^b  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CLARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervical cytology; Clinical care; Gynecology; Papanicolaou smear; Patient care

Indexed keywords

COLPOSCOPY; CYTOLOGY; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 0036915606     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2002.127308     Document Type: Review

References (3)

1. Feinstein AR. Clinical Judgement. Huntington (NY): Robert E. Krieger; 1967.
2. Wright TC Jr, Cox T, Massad S, Twiggs LB, Wilkenson EJ, 2001 ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. 2001 Consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA 2002;287:2120-9.
3. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: Terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2001;287:2114-9.