Assessing the actual risks faced by cyclists

Traffic Engineering and Control

Volumn 43, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 420-428

  Wardlaw, Malcolm ^a  

^a Traffic Engineering and Control   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; BICYCLES;

PEDESTRIANS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; CYCLE TRANSPORT; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING;

EID: 0036914140     PISSN: 00410683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions. The National Cycling Strategy. London: Crown Copyright, 1996.
2. Rutter H. Transport and Health. A policy report on the benefits of increasing cycle use in Oxfordshire. www.modalshift.org/reports/tandh/print⋮rsion.htm.
3. Morgan JM. Risk in cycling. Transport and Road Research Laboratory Working Paper WP/RS/75, TRL, Crowthorne, 1988.
4. What happens if you double your mileage? in: Road accidents in Great Britain; the casualty report 1991, p51-2. Department of Transport, London.
5. Wachtel A, Lewiston D. Risk factors for bicycle-motor vehicle collisions at intersections. ITE Journal. Sep 1994 pp30-35.
6. Garder P, Leden L, Thedeen T. Safety implications of bicycle paths at signalised intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 1994;26:429-39.
7. Franklin J. Segregation: are we moving away from cyclist safety? Traffic Engineering & Control, April 2002.
8. Carre J-R. La bicyclette: un mode de deplacement meconnu dans ses risques comme dans son usage. Recherche Transports Securite, Dec 1995;49:19-34.
9. Mynors P, Savell A. Comparisons of cycling provision in four northern European countries. Transportation Planning Systems, July/Sep 1994;2:59-67.
10. Dutch bicycle policy in the 1990s, Chapter 3 in: The Dutch Bicycle Master Plan. Ministry for Transport, Public Works and Water Management, The Hague, March 1999.
11. Department for the Environment, Transport and the Regions. Safety framework for cycling. National Cycling Forum, April 1999.
12. Leden L, Garder P, Pulkkinen U. An expert judgement model applied to estimating the safety effect of a bicycle facility. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2000;32:589-599.
13. Ekman L. On the treatment of flow in traffic safety analysis: a non-parametric approach applied to vulnerable road users. Dept of Traffic Planning and Engineering, University of Lund, Bulletin 136, Lund, Sweden, 1996.
14. Road Safety 1: Seat Belts. Chapter 7 pp138-140 in: Adams J. Risk. UCL Press, London:1996.
15. Camall D. Cycling and health promotion. British Medical Journal 2000;320:888-9.