Techniques for magnetic resonance imaging of the bowel

Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 379-387

  Lomas, David J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bowel; Magnetic resonance imaging; Techniques

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; ENTEROPATHY; HUMAN; LARGE INTESTINE DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SMALL INTESTINE DISEASE; TECHNIQUE; TECHNOLOGY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; INTESTINAL DISEASES; INTESTINE, SMALL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 0036914047     PISSN: 08993459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00002142-200212000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Young IR, Clarke GJ, Bailes DR, et al. Enhancement of relaxation rate with paramagnetic contrast agents in NMR imaging. J Comput Tomogr 1981;5:543-547.
2. Runge VM, Foster MA, Clanton JA, et al, Particulate oral NMR contrast agents. Int J Nucl Med Biol 1985;12:37-42.
3. Wesbey GE, Brasch RC, Goldberg HI, et al. Dilute oral iron solutions as gastrointestinal contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: Initial clinical experience. Magn Reson Imaging 1985;3:57-64.
4. Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, et al. The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 1990;16:192-225.
5. Barkhausen J, Quick HH, Lauenstein T, et al. Whole-body MR imaging in 30 seconds with real-time true FISP and a continuously rolling table platform: Feasibility study. Radiology 2001;220:252-256.
6. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:591-603.
7. Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985;3:329-343.
8. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR enteroclysis protocol optimization: Comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences. Eur Radiol 2001;11:908-913.
9. Constable RT, Gore JC. The loss of small objects in variable TE imaging: Implications for FSE, RARE, and EPI. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:9-24.
10. Busse RF, Riederer SJ, Fletcher JG, et al. Interactive fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:339-348.
11. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, et al. Contrast optimization for assessment of the colonic wall and lumen in MR colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:745-750.
12. Papanikolaou N, Prassopoulos P, Grammatikakis J, et al. Optimization of a contrast medium suitable for conventional enteroclysis, MR enteroclysis, and virtual MR enteroscopy. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:517-22.
13. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999;212:876-884.
14. Hennig J, Scheffier K. Hyperechoes. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:6-12.
15. Holsinger AE, Wright RC, Riederer SJ, et al. Real-time interactive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:547-553.
16. Kerr AB, Pauly JM, Hu BS, et al. Real-time interactive MRI on a conventional scanner. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:355-367.
17. Makki M, Graves MJ, Lomas DJ. Interactive body magnetic resonance fluoroscopy using modified single-shot half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) with multiparameter control. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:85-93.
18. Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L, et al. Evaluation of Crohn disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:219-228.
19. Rieber A, Nussle K, Reinshagen M, et al. MRI of the abdomen with positive oral contrast agents for the diagnosis of inflammatory small bowel disease. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:394-399.
20. Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. Radiographics 2001;21:S161-S172.
21. Patak MA, Froehlich JM, von Weymarn C, et al. Non-invasive distension of the small bowel for magnetic-resonance imaging. Lancet 2001;358:987-988.
22. Lomas DJ, Graves MJ. Small bowel MRI using water as a contrast medium. Br J Radiol 1999;72:994-997.
23. Sood RR, Joubert I, Franklin H, et al. Small bowel MRI: Comparison of a polyethylene glycol preparation and water as oral contrast media. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;15:401-408.
24. Rieber A, Wruk D, Potthast S, et al. Diagnostic imaging in Crohn's disease: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional imaging methods. Int J Colorectal Dis 2000;15:176-181.
25. Schunk K, Kersjes W, Schadmand Fischer S, et al. [A mannitol solution as an oral contrast medium in pelvic MRT]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1995;163:60-66.
26. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, et al. Small-bowel disease: Comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 2000;215:717-725.
27. Lomas DJ, Sood RR, Graves MJ, et al. MR small bowel enteroclysis with a combined half-Fourier RARE technique. Proceedings of the 1999 Annual ISMRM Meeting, Philadelphia, 1999;1:521.
28. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 2000;119:300-304.
29. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, et al. Colonic masses: Detection with MR colonography. Radiology 2000;216:383-388.
30. 2 enema - Pilot study. Radiology 2001;219:558-562.
31. Morrin MM, Hochman MG, Farrell RJ, et al. MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: Work in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:144-146.
32. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Debatin JF. Fecal tagging: MR colonography without colonic cleansing. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:410-417.
33. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC 3rd, et al. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1496-1503.