Ultrasound velocity in the tibia in Japanese patients with hip fracture

Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 623-628

  Muraki, Shigeyuki ^a   Yamamoto, Seizo ^a   Kanai, Hiroyuki ^a  

^a Tokyo Geriatric Medical Center   (Japan)

Author keywords

Hip fracture; Tibia; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MASS; BONE MINERAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; JAPAN; OSTEOPOROSIS; TIBIA; ULTRASOUND; VELOCITY;

EID: 0036911097     PISSN: 09492658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s007760200112     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dretakis EC, Kontakis GM, Steriopoulos CA, et al. Decreased broadband ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus in women with fragility fracture. Eighty-five Colles' and hip fracture cases versus 77 normal women. Acta Orthop Scand 1994;65:305-8.
2. Faulkner KG, Cann CE, Hasegawa BH. Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: Assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis. Radiology 1991;179:669-74.
3. Foldes AJ, Rimon A, Keinan DD, et al. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia: A novel approach for assessment of bone status. Bone 1995;17:363-7.
4. Funck C, Wuster C, Alenfeld FE, et al. Ultrasound velocity of the tibia in normal German women and hip fracture patients. Calcif Tissue Int 1996;58:390-4.
5. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, et al. Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: The EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 1996;348:511-4.
6. Heaney RP, Avioli LV, Chesnut CH, et al. Osteoporotic bone fragility. Detection by ultrasound transmission velocity. JAMA 1989;261:2986-90.
7. Ito M, Hayashi K, Kawahara Y, et al. The relationship of trabecular and cortical bone mineral density to spinal fractures. Invest Radiol 1993;28:573-80.
8. Kleerekoper M, Villanueva AR, Stanciu J, et al. The role of threedimensional trabecular microarchitecture in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1985:37:594-7.
9. Lee SC, Coan BS, Bouxsein ML. Tibial ultrasound velocity measured in situ predicts the material properties of tibial cortical bone. Bone 1997;21:119-25.
10. Leong KH. Ultrasound of the tibia-precision error, left versus right sides and correlation with bone mineral density. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1997;26:747-9.
11. McCarthy RN, Jeffcott LB, McCartney RN. Ultrasound speed in equine cortical bone: Effects of orientation, density, porosity and temperature. J Biomech 1990;23:1139-43.
12. Mazess RB. Fracture risk: A role for compact bone [editorial] [see comments]. Calcif Tissue Int 1990;47:191-3.
13. Miyatake M, Muta H, Murota C, et al. Bone status assessment in Japanese subjects using speed of sound along the tibia. Chin Med J 2002;115:254-7.
14. Mizuno Y, Nakamura T, Hayashi M, et al. Measurement of ultrasound velocity in the tibial cortical bone. Osteoporosis Japan 1997;5:91-5.
15. Mosekilde L. Sex differences in age-related loss of vertebral trabecular bone mass and structure; biomechanical consequences. Bone 1989;10:425-32.
16. Orgee JM, Foster H, McCloskey EV, et al. A precise method for the assessment of tibial ultrasound velocity. Osteoporos Int 1996;6:1-7.
17. Rosenthall L, Caminis J, Tenenhouse A. Correlation of ultrasound velocity in the tibial cortex, calcaneal ultrasonography, and bone mineral densitometry of the spine and femur. Calcif Tissue Int 1996;58:415-8.
18. Stegman MR, Heaney RP, Travers-Gustafson D, et al. Cortical ultrasound velocity as an indicator of bone status. Osteoporos Int 1995;5:349-53.
19. Wang SF, Chang CY, Shih C, et al. Evaluation of tibial cortical bone by ultrasound velocity in oriental females. Br J Radiol 1997;70:1126-30.