Susceptibility of cypress seedlings to the eriophyoid mite Trisetacus juniperinus

Experimental and Applied Acarology

Volumn 26, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 195-207

  Castagnoli, Marisa ^a   Simoni, S ^a   Panconesi, A ^b   Failla, O ^c  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DELLA NUTRIZIONE   (Italy)

^b Ist Patol degli Alberi Forestali   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cupressus sempervirens; Damage categories; Seedling families; Seiridium cardinale; Susceptibility; Trisetacus juniperinus

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; MITE; PEST RESISTANCE; PEST SPECIES; SEEDLING;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLIMATE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CUPRESSUS; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INFESTATION; ITALY; MITE; PARASITOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEEDLING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; CLIMATE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CUPRESSUS; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; ITALY; LINEAR MODELS; MITE INFESTATIONS; MITES; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEEDLING;

ACARI; ANIMALIA; CUPRESSACEAE; CUPRESSUS; CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS; ERIOPHYIDAE; ERIOPHYOIDEA; SEIRIDIUM; SEIRIDIUM CARDINALE;

EID: 0036909081     PISSN: 01688162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021126401106     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Castagnoli M. 1996. Ornamental coniferous and shade trees. In: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. and Bruin J. (eds), World Crop Pests. Eriophyoid Mites. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 661-671.
2. Castagnoli M. and Simoni S. 1998. Danni da acari eriofidi sul cipresso. Ann. Acc. It. Sci. For. XLVII: 69-78.
3. Castagnoli M. and Simoni S. 2000. Observations on intraplant distribution and life history of eriophyoid mites (Acari: Eriophyidae, Phytoptidae) inhabiting evergreen cypress, Cupressus sempervirens L. Internat. J. Acarol. 26: 93-99.
4. Guido M., Battisti A. and Roques A. 1995. A contribution to the study of cone and seed pests of the evergreen cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) in Italy. Redia LXXVIII: 221-227.
5. Jeppson L.R., Keifer H.H. and Baker E.W. 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA, 614 pp.
6. Nuzzaci G. and Monaco R. 1977. Danni al cipresso da Trisetacus juniperinus. Informatore Fitopatologico 11: 11-14.
7. Panconesi A. and Raddi P. 1998. Osservazioni e considerazioni sul cancro del cipresso in Toscana. Ann. Acc. It. Sci. For. XLVII: 14-34.
8. Raddi P. and Panconesi A. 1998. Valorizzazione del patrimonio genetico per la resistenza al cancro del cipresso in Toscana. Ann. Acc. It. Sci. For. XLVII: 45-53.
9. Royalty R.N. and Perring T.M. 1996. Nature of damage and its assessment. In: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. and Bruin J. (eds), World Crop Pests. Eriophyoid Mites. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 493-512.
10. Sabelis M.W. and Bruin J. 1996. Evolutionary ecology: Life history patterns, food plant choice and dispersal. In: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. and Bruin J. (eds), World Crop Pests. Eriophyoid Mites. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 329-366.
11. SPSS Inc. 1999. SPSS ® Base 9.0. Applications Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois.
12. Westhphal E. and Manson D.C.M. 1996. Feeding effects on host plants: Gall formation and other distorsions. In: Lindquist E.E., Sabelis M.W. and Bruin J. (eds), World Crop Pests. Eriophyoid mites. Their biology, natural enemies and control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 231-250.