Distribution of coronary artery lesions in patients with permanent pacemakers

Anadolu Kardiyoloji Dergisi

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 279-283

  Tandoǧan, Izzet ^a   Yetkin, Ertan ^b   Güray, Yeşim ^b   Aksoy, Yüksel ^b   Sezgin, Alpay T ^a   Özdemir, Ramazan ^a   Çehreli, Şengül ^b   Şaşmaz, Ali ^b  

^a INONU UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b TURKIYE YUKSEK IHTISAS HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Pathological coronary anatomy; Permanent pacemaker

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FLOW MEASUREMENT; HEART ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE; HEART MUSCLE CONDUCTION DISTURBANCE; HUMAN; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; RISK FACTOR; SINUS NODE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ARRHYTHMIA; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HEART CONDUCTION SYSTEM; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 0036908508     PISSN: 13028723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Davis D. Diagnosis and management of cardiac arrhythmias in the postoperative period. Surg Clin North Am 1983; 63:1091-102.
2. Nestico PF, Depace NL, Morganroth J, Kotler MN, Ross J. Mitral annular calcification: clinical, pathophysiology, and echocardiographic review. Am Heart J 1984; 107: 989-96.
3. Bosch X, Theroux P, Roy D, Moise A, Waters DD. Coronary angiographic significance of left anterior fascicular block during acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 9-15.
4. Dodge JT, Brown BG, Bolson EL, Dodge HT. Lumen diameter of normal human coronary arteries. Circulation 1992; 86: 232-46.
5. Mosseri M, Izak T, Rosenheck S, et al. Coronary angiographic characteristics of patients with permanent artificial pacemakers. Circulation 1997; 96: 809-15.
6. Col JJ, Weinberg SL. The incidence and mortality of intraventricular conduction defects in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1972;29:344-50.
7. Norris RM, Croxon MS. Bundle branch block in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1970; 79: 728-33.
8. Harper JR, Harley A, Hackel DB, et al. Coronary artery disease and major conduction disturbances. A pathologic study designed to correlate vascular and conduction system abnormalities with electrocardiogram. Am Heart J 1969; 77: 411-22.
9. James TN. The coronary circulation and conduction system in acute myocardial infarction. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1968; 10: 410-47.
10. Lev M. Anatomic basis for atrioventricular block. Am J Med 1964;37:742-8.
11. Lev M, Unger PN. The pathology of conduction system in acquired heart disease. 1. Severe atrioventricular block. Arch Pathol 1955; 60: 502-29.
12. Sutton R, Davies M. The conduction system in acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart block. Circulation 1968; 38: 987-92.
13. Hambly RJ, Tabrah F, Gupta M. Interventricular conduction disturbances and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1973; 32: 756-65.
14. Caspi Y, Safadi T, Ammar R, Elamy A, Fishman NH, Merin G. The significance of bundle branch block in the immediate postoperative electrocardiograms of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 93: 442-6.
15. Baerman JM, Kirsh MM, De Buitleir M, et al. Natural history and determinants of conduction defects following coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1987; 44: 150-3.
16. Mosseri M, Meir G, Lotan C, et al. Coronary pathology predicts conduction disturbances after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 51: 248-52.