Designing for maintenance: A game theoretic approach

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 561-577

  Hernandez, Gabriel ^a   Seepersad, Carolyn Conner ^b   Mistree, Farrokh ^b  

^a SIEMENS POWER GENERATION   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative design; Decision support; Distributed design; Game theory; Maintenance

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; GAME THEORY; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCT DESIGN;

COLLABORATIVE DESIGNS;

MAINTAINABILITY;

EID: 0036907647     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03052150215717     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ASHRAE (2001). ASHRAE Fundantentals Handbook, ASHRAE Handbook Series.
2. Chen, W., Allen, J.K. and Mistree, F. (1993). Hierarchical selection in gas turbine maintenance management. ASME Advances in Design Automation, ASME DE, 65, 87-96.
3. Elsayed, E.A. (1996). Reliability Engineering. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts.
4. Fudenburg, D. and Tirole, J. (1993). Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Hemandez, G., Allen, J.K. and Mistree, F. (2001). The compromise decision support problem: Modeling the deviation function as in physical programming. Engineering Optimization, 33(4), 445-471.
6. Hernandez, G. and Mistree, F. (2000). Integrating product design and manufacturing: A game theoretic approach. Engineering Optimization, 32(6), 749-775.
7. Hernandez, G., Seepersad, C.C. and Mistree, F. (2000). Commonalizing subsystem components to facilitate maintenance: A game theoretic approach. 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, AIAA-2000-4806.
8. Korilis, Y., Lazar, A. and Orda, A. (1997). Achieving network optima using Stackelberg routing strategies. IEEE/ACME Transactions on Networking, 5(1), 161-170.
9. Kreps, D.M. (1990). Game Theory and Economic Modeling. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Lewis, K. and Mistree, F. (1997). Modeling interaction in multidisciplinary design: A game theoretic approach. AIAA Journal, 35(8), 1387-1392.
11. Marston, M. (2000). Game based design: A game theory based approach to engineering design. PhD dissertation, G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
12. Messac, A. (1996). Physical programming: Effective optimization for computational design. AIAA Journal, 34(1), 149-158.
13. Messac, A., Gupta, S.M. and Akbulut, B. (1996). Linear physical programming: A new approach to multiple objective optimization. Transactions in Operations Research, 8, 39-59.
14. Mistree, F., Hughes, O.F. and Bras, B.A. (1993). The compromise decision support problem and the adaptive linear programming algorithm. In: Kamat, M.P. (Ed.), Structural Optimization: Status and Promise. AIAA, Washington, D.C., 247-286.
15. Myers, R.H. and Montgomery, D.C. (1995). Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
16. Myerson, R.B. (1991). Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Rao, J.R.J., Badhrinath, K., Pakala, R. and Mistree, F. (1997). A study of optimal design under conflict using models of multi-player games. Engineering Optimization, 28(1), 63-94.
18. Rao, S.S. and Freihet, T.I. (1991). A modified game theory approach to multiobjective optimization. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 113(3), 286-291.
19. Vincent, T.L. (1983). Game theory as a design tool. ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design, 105(2), 165-170.