Recent antitrust enforcement actions by the U.S. Department of Justice: A selective survey of economic issues

Review of Industrial Organization

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 373-397

  Katz, Michael L ^a  

^a United States Department of Justice   (United States)

Author keywords

Antitrust; Exclusionary practices; Merger policy; Predation

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); INDUSTRIAL POLICY; LAW ENFORCEMENT;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036905848     PISSN: 0889938X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021139400151     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baker, Jonathan B. (1988) 'Private Information and the Deterrent Effect of Antitrust Damage Remedies', The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 4, 385-408.
2. Baumol, William J. (1996) 'Predation and the Logic of the Average Variable Cost Test', Journal of Law and Economics, XXXIX (April), 49-72.
3. Bolton, Patrick, Joseph Brodley, and Michael H. Riordan (2000) 'Predatory Pricing: Strategic Theory and Legal Policy', The Georgetown Law Journal, 88, 2239-2330.
4. Borenstein, Severin (1992) 'The Evolution of Airline Competition', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (Spring), 45-75.
5. Cournot, Augustin A. (1838) Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth, English translation of French original, New York: Kelly.
6. European Commission (2001) 'Commission Decision as of 03/07/2001 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the common market and the EEA Agreement', Case No. COMP/M,2220 - General Electric/Honeywell, July 3, 2001, available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/ cases/decisions/m2220.pdf
7. Katz, Michael L. (1989) 'Vertical Contractual Relations', in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig, eds., The Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, pp. 655-721.
8. Katz, Michael L., and Carl Shapiro (1985) 'On the Licensing of Innovations', Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 504-520.
9. Salant, Stephen W. (1987) 'Treble Damage Awards in Private Lawsuits for Price Fixing', The Journal of Political Economy, 95, 1326-1336.
10. Stigler, George J. (1964) 'A Theory of Oligopoly', The Journal of Political Economy, 72, 44-61.
11. U.S. Department of Justice (2001) ' Range Effects: The United States Perspective', Antitrust Division Submission for OECD Roundtable on Portfolio Effects in Conglomerate Mergers, October 12, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/international/9550.htm
12. U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (1992) Horizontal Merger Guidelines, April 2, 1992 (revised April 8, 1997), available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/guidelines/horizok/hmg1.html
13. U.S. v. AMR Corporation, American Airlines, Inc., and AMR Eagle Holding Corporation (1999) Civil Action No. 99-1180-JTM, Complaint, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, May 13, 1999, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f2400/2438.htm
14. U.S. v. AMR Corporation, American Airlines, Inc., and AMR Eagle Holding Corporation (2001) No. 99-1180-JTM, Memorandum and Order, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, April 27, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f8100/8134.htm
15. U.S. v. AMR Corporation, American Airlines, Inc., and AMR Eagle Holding Corporation (2002a) No. 01-3202, Brief for Appellant United States of America, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, January 11, 2002, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f9800/9814.htm
16. U.S. v. AMR Corporation, American Airlines, Inc., and AMR Eagle Holding Corporation (2002b) No. 01-3203, Appellee's Brief, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, February 26, 2002, available at http://www.aadoj.com/judgement/aaplyj.pdf
17. U.S. v. AMR Corporation, American Airlines, Inc., and AMR Eagle Holding Corporation (2002c) No. 01-3202, Reply Brief for Appellant United States of America, Public Redacted Version, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, March 19, 2002, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f10800/10856.pdf
18. U.S. v. Dentsply International, Inc. (1999) Civil Action No. 99-005, Complaint, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, January 5, 1999, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f2100/2164.htm
19. U.S. v. Dentsply International, Inc. (2001a) Civil Action No. 99-005-SLR, Order, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, March 30, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f7800/7849.pdf
20. U.S. v. Dentsply International, Inc. (2001b) Civil Action No. 99-005-SLR, Memorandum Opinion, U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, March 30, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f7800/7849.pdf
21. U.S. v. General Dynamics Corporation and Newport News Shipbuilding, Inc. (2001) Civil No: 1:01CV02200, Complaint, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, October 23, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f9300/9373.htm
22. U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (1998) Civil Action No. 98-1232 (Antitrust), Complaint, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, May 18, 1998, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f1700/1763.htm
23. U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (2000a) Civil Action No. 98-1232 (TPJ), Court's Finding of Facts, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, November 5, 1999, 84 F. Supp. 2d 9 (J.S. App. 46-246).
24. U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (2000b) Civil Action No. 98-1232 (TPJ), Conclusions of Law, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, April 3, 2000, 87 F. Supp. 2d 30 (J.S. App. 1-43).
25. U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (2000c) Civil Action No. 98-1232 (TPJ), Final Judgment, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, June 7, 2000, 97 F. Supp. 2d 59 (J.S. App. 253-279).
26. U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (2000d) Civil Action No. 98-1232 (TPJ), Remedies Brief of Amici Curiae Robert E. Litan, Roger G. Noll, William D. Nordhaus, and Frederic Scherer, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, April 27, 2000, 97 F. Supp. 2d 59 (D.D.C. 2000)(No. 98-1232), available at http://www.brook.edu/views/papers/litan/20000428.pdf
27. U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (2001a) No. 00-5212, Opinion filed Per Curium, United States Court of Appeals for the Circuit of the District of Columbia, June 28, 2001, 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001), available at http://ecfp.cadc.uscourts.gov/MS-Docs/1720/0.pdf
28. U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (2001b) Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK), Competitive Impact Statement, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, November 15, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f9500/9549.htm#CIS
29. U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (2002a) Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK), Response of the United States to Public Comments on the Revised Proposed Final Judgment, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, February 7, 2002, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f10100/10145.pdf
30. U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (2002b) Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK), Second Revised Proposed Final Judgment, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, February 27, 2002, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f10100/10146a.htm
31. U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (2002c) Civil Action No. 98-1232 (CKK), United States' Memorandum Regarding Modifications Contained in Second Revised Proposed Final Judgment, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, February 27, 2002, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f10100/10144.htm
32. U.S. v. Northwest Ailines Corporation and Continental Airlines, Inc. (1998) Civil Action No. 98-746-11, Amended Complaint, U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida Tampa Division, December 18, 1998, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f2100/2158.htm
33. U.S. v. Premdor, Inc., Premdor U.S. Holdings, Inc. International Paper Company, and Masonite Corporation (2001a) Civil No.: 01-01696, Complaint, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, August 3, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f8800/8893.htm
34. U.S. v. Premdor, Inc., Premdor U.S. Holdings, Inc. International Paper Company, and Masonite Corporation (2001b) Civil No.: 01-01696, Competitive Impact Statement, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, August 3, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f9000/9017.htm
35. U.S. v. Premdor, Inc., Premdor U.S. Holdings, Inc, International Paper Company, and Masonite Corporation (2001c) Civil No.: 01-01696, Final Judgment (Proposed), U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, August 3, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f8900/8908.pdf
36. U.S. v. SunGard Data Systems, Inc, and Comdisco, Inc. (2001a) Civil No.: 01-2196 (ESH), Redacted Complaint, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, October 22, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f9400/9438.htm
37. U.S. v. SunGard Data Systems, Inc. and Comdisco, Inc. (2001b) Civil Action No. 01-02196 (ESH), Redacted Memorandum Opinion, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, November 14, 2001, 172 F.Supp. 2d 172 (2001), available at http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/01-2196a.pdf
38. U.S. v. 3D Systems Corporation and DTM Corporation (2001a) Civil Action No. 1:01CV01237, Verified Complaint, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, June 6, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f8800/8896.htm
39. U.S. v. 3D Systems Corporation and DTM Corporation (2001b) Civil Action No. 1:01CV01237, Final Judgment (Proposed), U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, August 16, 2001, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/cases/f8900/8926.htm