The digital camera in clinical practice

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1175-1189

  Smith, Richard V ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERA; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DIGITAL CAMERA; FILM; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX DISORDER; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PHYSICIAN; REVIEW; TELECOMMUNICATION;

HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MEDICAL RECORDS; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 0036904022     PISSN: 00306665     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0030-6665(02)00066-X     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Ratner D, Thomas CO, Bickers D. The uses of digital photography in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:749-56.
2. Barrs DM, Fukushima T, McElveen JT. Digital camera documentation for facial nerve outcome assessment. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:928-30.
3. Goodwin MD, Otake LR, Persing JA, Shin JH. A preliminary report of the virtual craniofacial center: Development of Internet-/intranet-based care coordination of pediatric craniofacial patients. Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:511-6.
4. Kokosha MS, Currens JW, Hollenbeak CS, Thomas JR, Stack BC. Digital vs. 35-mm photography: To convert or not to convert? Arch Facial Plast Surg 1999;1:276-81.
5. Belanger AJ, Lopes AE, Sinard JH. Implementation of a practical imaging system for routine gross photography in an autopsy environment. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124: 160-5.
6. Frank MS, Dreyer KJ, Mehta A. The megapixel digital camera: Value for creating publication-quality illustrations. Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:883-7.
7. Houkin K, Kuroda S. Digital recording in microsurgery: Technical note. J Neurosurg 2000;92:176-80.
8. Wilcox LR, Grimwood RE. A comparative study of digital images versus 35-millimeter images. Mil Med 1995;160:470-2.
9. Wall S, Kazahaya K, Becker SS, Becker DG. Thirty-five millimeter versus digital photography: Comparison of photographic quality and clinical evaluation. Facial Plast Surg 1999;15:101-9.
10. Sasson M. Photography without film: Low-cost digital cameras come of age in dermatology. Int J Dermatol 1994;33:113-5.
11. Kuo RL, Delvecchio FC, Preminger GM. Use of a digital camera in the urologic setting. Urology 1999;53:613-6.
12. Wirthlin DJ, Buradagunta S, Edwards RA, Brewster DC, Cambria RP, Gertler JP, et al. Telemedicine in vascular surgery: Feasibility of digital imaging for remote management of wounds. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:1089-100.
13. Dieu T, Donahoe SR. Digital camera and the Internet: Bringing the patient home. Med J Aust 1999;171:567.
14. Rutka JT, Otsubo H, Kitano S, Sakamoto H, Shinasuwa A, Ochi A, et al. Utility of digital camera-derived intra operative images in the planning of epilepsy surgery for children. Neurosurgery 1999;45:1186-91.
15. Houkin K, Kuroda S, Abe H. Operative record using intraoperative digital data in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000;142:913-9.
16. Galdino GM, DaSilva D, Gunter JP. Digital photography for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:1421-34.
17. Galdino GM, Vogel JE, Vander Kolk CA. Standardizing digital photography: It's not all in the eye of the beholder. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1334-44.
18. Buntic RF, Siko PP, Buncke GM, Ruebeck D, Kind GM, Buncke HT, et al. Using the Internet for rapid exchange of photographs and X-ray images to evaluate potential extremity replantation candidates. J Trauma 1997;43:342-4.
19. Baldwin AJ, Langton SG. Postoperative monitoring of flaps by digital camera and Internet link. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;39:120-1.
20. Vassallo DJ, Swifen P, Swinfen R, Wooton R. Experience with a low-cost telemedicine system in three developing countries. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7:56-8.
21. Vassallo DJ. Twelve month's experience with telemedicine for the British armed forces. J Telemed Telecare 1999;5:S117-8.
22. Debray M, Couturier P, Greuillet F, Hohn C, Banerjee S, Franco A, et al. A preliminary study of the feasibility of wound telecare for the elderly. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7:353-8.