Computing heading in the presence of moving objects: A model that uses motion-opponent operators

Vision Research

Volumn 42, Issue 28, 2002, Pages 3043-3058

  Royden, Constance S ^a  

^a Department of Biology   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational model; Heading; Middle temporal area; Motion opponent; Optic flow

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; MODEL; MOTION; PRIMATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TEMPORAL LOBE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TEMPORAL LOBE; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0036898906     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00394-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Allman J., Miezin F., McGuiness E. Direction- and velocity-specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field in the middle temporal visual area (MT). Perception. 14:1985;105-126.
2. Bruss A.R., Horn B.K.P. Passive navigation. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing. 21:1983;3-20.
3. Beintema J.A., van den Berg A.V. Heading detection using motion templates and eye velocity gain fields. Vision Research. 38:1998;2155-2179.
4. Beintema J.A., van den Berg A.V. Pursuit affects precision of perceived heading for small viewing apertures. Vision Research. 41:2001;2375-2391.
5. Cutting J.E., Springer K., Braren P.A., Johnson S.H. Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 121:1992;41-72.
6. Cutting J.E., Vishton P.M., Braren P.A. How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving objects. Psychological Review. 102:1995;627-651.
7. Crowell J.A., Banks M.S. Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow. Perception and Psychophysics. 53:1993;325-337.
8. Crowell J.A., Banks M.S. Ideal observer for heading judgments. Vision Research. 36:1996;471-490.
9. Crowell J.A., Royden C.S., Banks M.S., Swenson K.H., Sekuler A.B. Optic flow and heading judgments. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 31(Suppl.):1990;522.
10. Duffy C.J., Wurtz R.H. Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large field stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology. 65:1991;1329-1345.
11. Duffy C.J., Wurtz R.H. An illusory transformation of optic flow fields. Vision Research. 33:1993;1481-1490.
12. Duffy C.J., Wurtz R.H. Response of Monkey MST neurons to optic flow stimuli with shifted centers of motion. Journal of Neuroscience. 15:1995;5192-5208.
13. Gibson J.J. The perception of the visual world. 1950;Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass.
14. Graziano M.S.A., Andersen R.A., Snowden R. Tuning of MST neurons to spiral motions. Journal of Neuroscience. 14:1994;54-67.
15. Hatsopoulos N.G., Warren W.H. Visual navigation with a neural network. Neural Networks. 4:1991;303-317.
16. Heeger D.J., Jepson A.D. Subspace methods for recovering rigid motion I: Algorithm and implementation. International Journal of Computer Vision. 7:1992;95-117.
17. Hildreth E.C. Recovering heading for visually-guided navigation. Vision Research. 32:1992;1177-1192.
18. Lappe M., Rauschecker J.P. A neural network for the processing of optic flow from ego-motion in man and higher mammals. Neural Computation. 5:1993;374-391.
19. Lappe M., Rauschecker J.P. An illusory transformation in a model of optic flow processing. Vision Research. 35:1995;1619-1631.
20. Longuet-Higgins H.C., Prazdny K. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 208:1980;385-397.
21. Maunsell J.H.R., van Essen D.C. Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed and orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology. 49:1983;1127-1147.
22. Pack C., Mingolla E. Global induced motion and visual stability in an optic flow illusion. Vision Research. 38:1998;3083-3093.
23. Perrone J.A. Model for the computation of self-motion in biological systems. Journal of the Optical Society of America, A. 9:1992;177-194.
24. Perrone J.A., Stone L.S. A model of self-motion estimation within primate extrastriate visual cortex. Vision Research. 34:1994;2917-2938.
25. Raiguel S., Van Hulle M.M., Xiao D.K., Marcar V.L., Orban G.A. Shape and spatial distribution of receptive fields and antagonistic motion surrounds in the middle temporal area (V5) of the macaque. European Journal of Neuroscience. 7:1995;2064-2082.
26. Rieger J.H., Lawton D.T. Processing differential image motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;354-360.
27. Royden C.S. Mathematical analysis of motion-opponent mechanisms used in the determination of heading and depth. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 14:1997;2128-2143.
28. Royden, C.S., & Conti, D. (2002). A model using velocity differences to compute heading can explain an illusory transformation of optic flow fields. Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract, Sarasota Florida.
29. Royden C.S., Hildreth E.C. Human heading judgments in the presence of moving objects. Perception and Psychophysics. 58:1996;836-856.
30. Saito H., Yukie M., Tanaka K., Hikosaka K., Fukada Y., Iwai E. Integration of direction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience. 6:1986;145-157.
31. Tanaka K., Saito H. Analysis of motion in the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology. 62:1989;626-641.
32. Warren W.H., Saunders J.A. Perceiving heading in the presence of moving objects. Perception. 24:1995;315-331.
33. Xiao D.K., Raiguel S., Marcar V., Koenderink J., Orban G.A. Spatial heterogeneity of inhibitory surrounds in the middle temporal visual area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 92:1995;11303-11306.