Shortened pull-string simplifies office-based ureteral stent removal

Urology

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1095-1097

  Jones, J Stephen ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOSCOPY; DEVICE REMOVAL; EXTRACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URETER STENT;

DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMANS; STENTS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; URETER;

EID: 0036898874     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02000-9     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bregg K., Riehle R.A. Morbidity associated with indwelling internal ureteral stents after shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 141:1989;510-512.
2. Chen Y.T., Chen J., Wong W.Y., et al. Is ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy? A prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 167:2002;1977-1980.
3. Rane A., Cahill D., Larner T., et al. To stent or not to stent? That is still the question. J Endourol. 14:2000;479-481.
4. Breau R.H., Norman R.W. Optimal prevention and management of proximal ureteral stent migration and remigration. J Urol. 166:2001;890-893.
5. Richter S. The indwelling ureteric stent a "friendly" procedure with unfriendly high morbidity . BJU Int. 85:2000;408-411.