Allozyme diversity in natural populations of Viola palmensis Webb & Berth. (Violaceae) from La Palma (Canary Islands): Implications for conservation genetics

Annals of Botany

Volumn 90, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 725-733

  Batista, Francisco ^a   Sosa, Pedro A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Allozymes; Canary Islands; Conservation genetics; Gene flow; Genetic diversity; Viola palmensis

Indexed keywords

ALLOZYME; CONSERVATION GENETICS; GENETIC VARIATION; POPULATION GENETICS;

ALLELES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOLOGY; ELECTROPHORESIS, STARCH GEL; ENZYMES; GEOGRAPHY; HETEROZYGOTE; SPAIN; VARIATION (GENETICS); VIOLA;

SPAIN;

INSECTA; VIOLA PALMENSIS; VIOLACEAE;

EID: 0036898475     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf256     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Amos B, Hoelzel AR. 1992. Applications of molecular genetic techniques to the conservation of small populations. Biological Conservation 61: 133-144.
2. Antlfinger AE, Curtis WF, Solbrig OT. 1985. Environmental and genetic determinants of plant size in Viola sororia. Evolution 39: 1053-1064.
3. Aradhya KM, Mueller-Dombois D, Ranker TA. 1991. Genetic evidence for recent and incipient speciation in the evolution of Hawaiian Metrosideros (Myrtaceae). Heredity, 67: 129-138.
4. Batista F, Bañares A, Caujapé-Castells J, Carqué E, Marrero-Gómez M, Sosa PA. 2001. Allozyme diversity in three endemic species of Cistus (Cistaceae) from the Canary Islands: Intraspecific and interspecific comparisons and implications for genetic conservation. American Journal of Botany 88: 1582-1592.
5. Beattie A. 1978. Plant-animal interactions affecting gene flow in Viola. In: Richards AJ, ed. The Pollination of Flowers by Insects. Linnean Society Symposium Series, Number 6. London: Academic Press, 151-164.
6. BOC. 2001. Decreto 151. de 23 de julio, por el que se crea el catálogo de especies amenazadas de Canarias. Boletín Oficial de Canarias 97: 11101-11111.
7. Bouza N, Caujapé-Castells J, González-Pérez MA, Batista F, Sosa PA. 2002. Population structure and genetic diversity of two endangered endemic species of the Canadan laurel forest: Dorycnium spectabile (Fabaceae) and Isoplexis chalcantha (Scrophulariaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 619-630.
8. Calero A, Santos A. 1988. Biología reproductiva de especies amenazadas en la flora Canaria. Lagasealia 15 (suppl.): 661-664.
9. Calero A, Santos A. 1993. Reproductive biology of the high altitude Canarian flora. In: Demiritz H, Zhatay O, eds. Proceedings of the 5th OPTIMA Meeting. 8-15 September 1986. Istanbul, Turkey: University of Istanbul.
10. Culley TM, Wolfe AD. 2001. Population genetic structure of the cleistogamous plant species Viola pubescens Aiton (Violaceae), as indicated by allozyme and ISSR molecular markers. Heredity 86: 545-556.
11. Ellstrand NC, Ellam DR. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 24: 217-242.
12. Francisco-Ortega J, Santos-Guerra A. 2001. Genes y conservación de plantas vasculares. In: Martín-Esquivel J, Fernández-Palacios JM, eds. Naturaleza de las Islas Canarias. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands: Editorial Turquesa, 357-365.
13. Francisco-Ortega J, Santos-Guerra A, Kim SC, Crawford DJ. 2000. Plant genetic diversity in the Canary Islands: A conservation perspective. American Journal of Botany 87: 909-919.
14. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA. 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Freville H, Justy F, Olivieri I. 2001. Comparative allozyme and microsatellite population structure in a narrow endemic plant species, Centaurea corymbosa Pourret (Asteraceae). Molecular Ecology 10: 879-889.
16. García-Casanova J, Rodríguez-Luengo JL, Rodríguez-Piñero C. 2001. Especies amenazadas. In: Martín-Esquivel J. Fernández-Palacios JM, eds. Naturaleza de las Islas Canarias. Santa Cruz de Tenerife. Canary Islands: Editorial Turquesa, 167-172.
17. Gómez-Campo C. 1996. Libro Rojo de Especies Vegetales Amenazadas de las Islas Canarias. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands: Viceconsejería de Medio Ambiente del Gobierno de Canarias.
18. Goudet J. 2000. FSTAT, a Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices (Version 2.9.1). http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html.
19. Hamrick JL, Godt MJW. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown HD, Clegg MT, Kahler AL. Weir BS, eds. Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer, 43-63.
20. Hamrick JL, Murawski DA, Loveless MD. 1991. Correlations between species traits and allozyme diversity: Implications for conservation biology. In: Falk DA. Holsinger KE, eds. Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. New York: Oxford University Press, 75-86.
21. Hartl DL, Clark AG. 1997. Principles of Population Genetics. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
22. Hedrick PW. 2000. Genetics of Populations. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones and Barlett.
23. Heywood JS. 1991. Spatial analysis of genetic variation in plant populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematies 22: 335-355.
24. Kim KS, Sun BY, Whang SS, Chung GH. 1991. Biosystematic study of the genus Viola in Korea: Comparative morphology of the Viola albida complex. Korean Journal of Botany 34: 229-238.
25. Ko MK, Yang J, Jin YH, Lee CH, Oh J. 1998. Genetic relationships of Viola species evaluated by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 73: 601-605.
26. Leberg PL. 1993. Strategies for population reintroduction: Effects of genetic variability on population growth and size. Conservation Biology 7: 194-199.
27. Lewis PO. 1993. Genestat-pc 3.3. Raleigh: Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University.
28. Lewis PO, Crawford DJ. 1995. Pleistocene refugium endemics exhibit greater allozymic diversity than widespread congeners in the genus Polygonella (Polygonaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 141-149.
29. Marcussen T, Borgen L. 2000. Allozymic variation and relationships within Viola subsection Viola (Violaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 223: 29-57.
30. Marcussen T, Nordal I. 1998. Viola suavis, a new species in the Nordic flora, with analyses of the relation to other species in the subsection Viola (Violaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 18: 221-237.
31. Nadot S, Ballard HE, Creach JB, Dajoz I. 2000. The evolution of pollen heteromorphism in Viola: A phylogenetic approach. Plant Systematics and Evolution 223: 155-171.
32. Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 70: 3321-3323.
33. Neuffer B, Auge H, Mesch H, Amarell U, Brandl R. 1999. Spread of violets in polluted pine forest: Morphological and molecular evidence for the ecological importance of interspecific hybridization. Molecular Ecology 8: 365-377.
34. Newell SJ, Solbrig OT, Kincaid DT. 1981. Studies on the population biology of the genus Viola. III. The demography of Viola blanda and Viola pallens. Journal of Ecology 69: 997-1016.
35. Nordal I, Jonsell B. 1998. A phylogeographical analysis of Viola rupestris: Three post-glacial immigration routes into the Nordic area? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 128: 105-122.
36. Oh BJ, Ko MK, Lee CH, 1998. Identification of the series-specific random amplified polymorphic DNA markers of Viola species. Plant Breeding 117: 295-296.
37. Raymond M, Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248-249.
38. Rieseberg LH, Swensen SM. 1996. Conservation genetics of endangered island plants. In: Avise JC. Hamrick JL. eds. Conservation Genetics: Case Studies from Nature. New York: Chapman and Hall.
39. Santos-Guerra A. 1999. Origen y evolución de la flora Canaria. In: Fernández-Palacios JM, Bacallado JJ, Belmonte JA, eds. Ecología y Cultura en Canarias. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands: Museo de la Ciencia, Cabildo Insular de Tenerife. 107-130.
40. Schellner RA, Newell SJ, Solbrig OT. 1982. Studies on the population biology of the genus Viola. IV. Spatial pattern of ramets and seedlings in three stoloniferous species. Journal of Ecology 70: 273-290.
41. Slatkin M. 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236: 787-792.
42. Smith JF, Pham TV. 1996. Genetic diversity of the narrow endemic Allium aaseae (Alliaceae). American Journal of Botany 83: 717-726.
43. Sosa PA. 2001. Genes, poblaciones y especies. In: Martín-Esquivel J, Fernández-Palacios JM. eds. Naturaleza de las Islas Canarias. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands: Editorial Turquesa, 151-155.
44. Storfer A. 1999. Gene flow and endangered species translocations: A topic revisited. Biological Conservation 87: 173-180.
45. Swofford DL, Selander RB. 1981. BIOSYS-1: A FORTRAN program for the comprehensive analysis of electrophoretic data in population genetics and systematics. Journal of Heredity 72: 281-283.
46. Walter KS, Gillett HJ. 1998. 1997 Red List of Threatened Plants. Gland, Switzerland: The World Conservation Union.
47. Weeden N, Wendel JF. 1989. Genetics of plant isozymes. In: Soltis D, Soltis P, eds. Isozymes in Plant Biology. Portland: Dioscorides Press, 46-72.
48. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
49. Wendel JF, Weeden N. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Soltis D, Soltis P, eds. Isozymes in Plant Biology. Portland: Dioscorides Press, 5-45.
50. Williamson PS, Werth CR. 1999. Levels and patterns of genetic variation in the endangered species Abronia macrocarpa (Nyctaginaceae). American Journal of Botany 86: 293-301.
51. Wright S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.
52. Wright S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.
53. Young A, Boyle T, Brown T. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 413-418.
54. Young AG, Clarke GM. 2000. Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.