Religious versus secular human service organizations: Implications for public policy

Social Science Quarterly

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 947-961

  Twombly, Eric C ^a  

^a URBAN INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036893788     PISSN: 00384941     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6237.00125     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Berger, P., and R.N. Neuhaus. 1977. To Empower People. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
2. Brown, R. 2001. "Emerging issues and Opportunities for Community-Based Organization Involvement in Welfare Reform." Issues Notes 5(5).
3. Chaves, M. 1994. "Secularization as Declining Religious Authority." Social Forces 72(3), 749-74.
4. _. 1999. Congregations' Social Service Activities. Charting Civil Society Series, Policy Brief No. 6. Washington, D.C.: Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy, The Urban Institute.
5. Cnaan, R.A., with R.J. Wineburg, and S.C. Boddie. 1999. The Newer Deal: Social Work and Religion in Partnership. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. De Vita, C.J., and S. Wilson. 2001. Faith-Based Initiatives: Sacred Deeds and Secular Dollars. Emerging Issues in Philanthropy Seminar Series. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
7. Elazar, D.J. 1972. American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
8. Glazer, N. 1989. The Limits of Social Policy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
9. Goodstein, L. 2001. "Church-Based Projects Lack Data on Results." New York Times April 24.
10. Grettenberger, S. 2000. Churches as a Community Resource and Source of Funding for Human Services. Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute.
11. Hodgkinson, V.A., M.S. Weitzman, A.D. Kirsch, S.M. Noga, and H.A. Gorski. 1993. From Belief to Commitment: The Community Service Activities and Finances of Religious Congregations in the United States. Washington, D.C.: The Independent Sector.
12. McCarthy, J., and J. Castelli. 1998. Religion Sponsored Social Service Providers: The Not-So Independent Sector. Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute.
13. Printz, T.J. 1998. Faith-Based Service Providers in the Nation'S Capital: Can They Do More? Charting Civil Society Series, Policy Brief No. 2. Washington, D.C.: Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy, The Urban Institute.
14. Salamon, L. 1995. Partners in Public Service: Government Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Schneider, J.C. 1996. "Philanthropic Styles in the United States: Toward a Theory of Regional Differences." Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 25(2), 190-210.
16. Smith, S.R., and M. Lipsky. 1993. Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
17. Smith, S.R., and M.R. Sosin. 2001. "The Varieties of Faith-Related Agencies." Public Administration Review 61 (6), 651-70.
18. Stevenson, D.R. 1995. In-Depth Verification of Organizations Classified According to the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities. Washington, D.C.: The Independent Sector.
19. Stevenson, D.R., T.H. Pollack, L.M. Lampkin, K.S. Pettit, and N.A.J. Stengel. 1997. State Nonprofit Almanac: Profiles of Charitable Organizations. Lanham, Md.: The Urban Institute Press.
20. Waller, M. 2001. Charity Tax Credits: Federal Policy and Three Leading States. Washington, D.C.: Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
21. Wilson, S. 2000. Election Year Proposals Affecting Charities: A Prelude to Future Legislation? Emerging Issues in Philanthropy Seminar Series. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
22. Wuthnow, R. 1999. "Clash of Values: The State, Religion, and the Arts." In E.T. Boris and C.E. Steuerle, eds., Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.