The perceptions of information systems designers from the United States, Japan, and Korea on success and failure factors

International Journal of Information Management

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 421-439

  Peterson, Dane K ^a   Kim, Chung ^a   Kim, Joong Han ^b   Tamura, Toshiyuki ^c  

^a MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Kyonggi University   (South Korea)

^c TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Attribution theory; IS designers' perceptions; IS success and failure factors

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 0036893532     PISSN: 02684012     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0268-4012(02)00033-6     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Adler N. International dimensions of organizational behavior. 1991;PWS-Kent Publishing, Boston.
2. Aladwani A.M. IS project characteristics and performance. A Kuwaiti illustration Journal of Global Information Management. 8(2):2000;50-57.
3. Bae H., Crittenden K.S. From attributions to dispositions. Explaining the attributional patterns of Korean students Journal of Social Psychology. 129(4):1989;481-489.
4. Baker B.N., Murphy D.C., Fisher D. Factors affecting project success. Cleland D.I., King W.R. Project management handbook. 1983;Van Norstrand Reinhold, New York.
5. Bettman J.R., Weitz B.A. Attributions in the boardroom. Causal reasoning in corporate annual reports Administrative Science Quarterly. 28(2):1983;165-183.
6. Burnson A. The perils of going global. Infoworld. 14:1989;39-40.
7. Chandler T.A., Shama D.D., Wolf F.M., Planchard S.K. Multiattributional causality. A five cross-national samples study Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 12(2):1981;207-221.
8. Chen M. Asian management systems. Chinese, Japanese, and Korean styles of business:1995;Routledge, New York.
9. Chiu L. Locus of control differences between American and Chinese adolescents. Journal of Social Psychology. 128(3):1988;411-413.
10. Chung K.H., Lee H.C. National differences in managerial practices. Chung K.H., Lee H.C. Korean managerial dynamics. 1989;Praeger, New York.
11. Crittenden K., Bae H. Self-effacement and social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist. 37(5):1994;653-671.
12. Dasgupta S., Agarwal D., Ioannidis A., Gopalakrishnan S. Determinants of information technology adoption. An extension of existing models to firms in a developing country Journal of Global Information Management. 7(3):1999;30-40.
13. Doke E.R., Swanson N.E. Decision variables for selecting prototyping in IS development. A Delphi study of MIS managers Information & Management. 29(4):1995;173-182.
14. Dos Santos B.L., Hawk S.R. Differences in analyst's attitudes towards information systems development. Evidence and implications Information & Management. 14(1):1988;31-41.
15. Ein-Dor P., Segev E. Organizational context and MIS structure. Some empirical evidence MIS Quarterly. 6(3):1982;55-67.
16. Ein-Dor P., Segev E., Orgad M. The effect of national culture on IS. Implications for international information systems Journal of Global Information Management. 1(1):1993;33-44.
17. English L.P. Turning information management into an effective business enabler. Information Strategy: The Executive's Journal. 12(2):1996;16-27.
18. Ewusi-Mensah K. Critical issues in abandon information systems development. Communications of the ACM. 40(9):1997;74-80.
19. Finchilescu G. Intergroup attributions in minimal groups. Journal of Social Psychology. 134(1):1994;111-118.
20. Ginzberg M.J. Key recurrent issues in the MIS implementation process. MIS Quarterly. 5(2):1981;47-59.
21. Grover V., Segar A.H., Durand D. Organizational practice, information resource deployment and systems success. A cross-cultural survey Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 3(2):1994;85-106.
22. Guimaraes T., Sato O., Kitanaka H. Comparing US and Japanese companies on competitive intelligence, IS support, and business change. Journal of Global Information Management. 7(3):1999;41-49.
23. Hammer M. Reengineering work. Don't automate, obliterate Harvard Business Review. 68(4):1990;104-112.
24. Heider F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. 1958;Wiley, New York.
25. Henderson J.C., Lee S. Managing I/S design teams. A control theories perspective Management Science. 38(6):1992;757-777.
26. Hofstede G. Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind:1991;McGraw-Hill, London.
27. Jiang J.J., Klein G., Balloun J. Ranking of system implementation success factors. Project Management Journal. 27(4):1996;49-53.
28. Jiang J., Klein G., Balloun J. Perceptions of system development failures. Information and Software Technology. 39(14-15):1998;933-937.
29. Jiang J.J., Klein G., Balloun J.L. Systems analysts' attitudes toward information systems development. Information Resources Management Journal. 11(4):1998;5-10.
30. Jones M.C., Harrison A.W. IS project team performance. An empirical assessment Information & Management. 31(2):1996;57-65.
31. Kashima Y., Triandis H. The self-serving bias in attribution as a coping strategy. A cross-cultural study Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology. 17(1):1986;83-97.
32. Katz J.P., Townsend J.B. The role of information technology in the "Fit" between culture, business strategy, and organizational structure of global firms. Journal of Global Information Management. 8(2):2000;24-35.
33. Kedia B.L., Bhagat R.S. Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations. Implications for research in international and comparative management Academy of Management Review. 13(4):1988;559-571.
34. Keider S. Why systems development projects fail. Journal of Information Systems Management. 1:1984;33-38.
35. Khalil O.E.M. Implications for the role of information systems in a business process-reengineering environment. Information Resources Management Journal. 10(1):1997;36-43.
36. Kirsch L.J., Cummings L.L. Contextual influences on self-control of IS professionals engaged in systems development. Accounting, Management, and Information Technologies. 6(3):1996;191-219.
37. Kumar K., Bjorn-Andersen N. A cross-cultural comparison of IS designer values. Communications of the ACM. 33(5):1990;528-538.
38. Liebowitz J. Information systems. Success or failure? Journal of Computer Information Systems. 40(1):1999;17-20.
39. Lyytinen K. Expectation failure concept and systems analyst's view of information systems failures. Results of an exploratory study Information & Management. 14(1):1988;45-56.
40. Lyytinen K., Hirschheim R. Information systems failures - a survey and classification of the empirical literature. Oxford Surveys in Information Technology. 4:1987;257-309.
41. Lyytinen K., Robey D. Learning failure in information systems development. Information Systems Journal. 9(2):1999;85-101.
42. Mansfield R., Zeffane R. Organizational structures and national contingencies. 1983;Gower, Aldershot, England.
43. Markus H.R., Kitayama S. Culture and the self. Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation Psychological Review. 98(2):1991;224-253.
44. McLeod R., Kim C., Saunders C., Jones J., Scheel C., Estrada M. Information management as perceived by CIOs in three Pacific rim countries. Journal of Global Information Management. 5(3):1997;5-16.
45. Miller G.A., Sharda B.D. Culture and organizational structure. A multinational comparison International Journal of Contemporary Sociology. 32(2):1995;201-220.
46. Nath R. Aligning MIS with the business goals. Information & Management. 16(2):1989;71-79.
47. Ng D., McClure J., Walkey F., Hunt M. New Zealand and Singaporean attributions and achievement perceptions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 26(3):1995;276-297.
48. Pinto J.F., Prescott J.E. Planning and tactical factors in the project implementation process. Journal of Management Studies. 27(3):1990;305-327.
49. Pinto J.K., Slevin D.P. Critical factors in successful project implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 34(1):1987;22-27.
50. Ratbe D., King W.R., Kim Y. The fit between project characteristics and application development methodologies. A contingency approach Journal of Computer Information Systems. 40(2):2000;26-33.
51. Redding S.G., Richardson S. Participative management and its varying relevance in Hong Kong and Singapore. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management. 3(2):1986;76-98.
52. Shore B. IT strategy. The challenge of over-regulation, culture, and large scale collaborations Journal of Global Information Technology Management. 1(1):1998;1-4.
53. Shore B., Venkatachalam V. Prototyping. a metaphor for cross-cultural transfer and implementation of is applications Information & Management. 27(3):1994;175-184.
54. Staw B.M., McKechnie P.I., Puffer S.M. The justification of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly. 28(4):1983;582-600.
55. Straub D., Loch K., Evaristo R., Karahanna E., Srite M. Toward a theory-based measurement of culture. Journal of Global Information Management. 10(1):2002;13-21.
56. Swanson E.G. Information systems implementation. 1988;Irwin, Homewood, IL.
57. Wastell D.G. Learning dysfunctions in information systems development. Overcoming the social defenses with transitional objects MIS Quarterly. 23(4):1999;581-600.
58. Waters D. 21st century management. Keeping ahead of the Japanese and Chinese:1991;Prentice-Hall, Singapore.
59. Watson R.T., Brancheau J.C. Key issues in IS management. An international perspective Information & Management. 20(3):1991;214-223.
60. Weiner B. An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review. 71(1):1985;3-25.
61. Weiner B. Attribution theory in organizational behavior. A relationship of mutual benefit Martinko M.J. Attribution theory: An organizational perspective. 1995;St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL.
62. Williams J.J., Ramaprasad A. A taxonomy of critical success factors. European Journal of Information Systems. 5(4):1996;250-260.
63. Yoshida T., Kojo K., Kaku H. A study of development on self-presentation in children. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology. 30:1982;30-37.