Linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans exposed to noise

Hearing Research

Volumn 174, Issue 1-2, 2002, Pages 290-295

  Moleti, A ^a   Sisto, R ^b   Lucertini, M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b ISPESL   (Italy)

^c Pratica di Mare AFB   (Italy)

Author keywords

Exposure to noise; Hearing loss; Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HEARING ACUITY; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; ARTIFACT; AUDITORY STIMULATION; EAR; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; NOISE INJURY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUE; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ARTIFACTS; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; EAR; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 0036888753     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00703-7     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Attias J., Furst M., Furman V., Reshef I., Horowitz G., Bresloff I. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss. Ear Hear. 16:1995;612-618.
2. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112:1992;155-159.
3. Furst M., Reshef I., Attias J. Manifestations of intense noise stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emission and threshold microstructure: experiment and model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:1992;1003-1014.
4. Hall A.J., Lutman M.E. Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology. 38:1999;277-280.
5. Hussain D.M., Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Keefe D.H., Peters J. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss. Ear Hear. 19:1998;434-449.
6. Kowalska S., Sulkowski W. Measurements of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in industrial workers with noise-induced hearing loss. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 10:1997;441-459.
7. Lucertini M., Moleti A., Sisto R. On the detection of early cochlear damage by otoacoustic emission analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:2002;972-978.
8. Prieve B.A., Gorga M.P., Schmidt A., Neely S., Peters J., Schultes L., Jesteadt W. Analysis of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:1993;3308-3319.
9. Sisto R., Moleti A. On the frequency dependence of the otoacoustic emission latency in hypoacoustic and normal ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:2002;297-308.
10. Sisto R., Moleti A., Lucertini M. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and relaxation dynamics of long decay time OAEs in audiometrically normal and impaired subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109:2001;638-647.
11. Tognola G., Ravazzani P., Molini E., Ricci G., Alunni N., Parazzini M., Grandori F. 'Linear' and 'derived' otoacoustic emissions in newborns: a comparative study. Ear Hear. 22:2001;182-190.
12. Yantis, P.A., Katz, J., 1994. Puretone air-conduction threshold testing. In: Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th edn. Williamson and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 97-108.