The representation of peripheral neural activity in the middle-latency evoked field of primary auditory cortex in humans

Hearing Research

Volumn 174, Issue 1-2, 2002, Pages 19-31

  Rupp, André ^a   Uppenkamp, Stefan ^b   Gutschalk, Alexander ^a   Beucker, Roland ^a   Patterson, Roy D ^b   Dau, Torsten ^c   Scherg, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked field; Auditory image; Chirp signal; Cochlear phase delay; Magnetoencephalography; Primary auditory cortex; Spatio temporal source modelling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CELL ACTIVATION; CELL FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL SYNCHRONIZATION; EMPIRICISM; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODEL; NERVE FIBER; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIKE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COCHLEAR NERVE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; COCHLEAR NERVE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0036888723     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00614-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ahonen A.I., Hämäläinen M.S., Kajola M.J., Knuutila J.E.T., Laine P.P., Lounasmaa O.V., Parkkonen L.T., Simola J.T., Tesche C.D. 122-channel SQUID instrument for investigating the magnetic signals from the human brain. Phys. Scr. T49:1993;198-205.
2. de Boer E. Auditory physics. Physical principles in hearing theory I. Phys. Rep. 62:1980;87-174.
3. Dau T., Wegner O., Mellert V., Kollmeier B. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar membrane dispersion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:2000;1530-1540.
4. Don M., Eggermont J.J. Analysis of click-evoked brainstem potentials in man using high-pass noise masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63:1978;1084-1092.
5. Giguère C., Woodland P.C. A computational model of the auditory periphery for speech and hearing research I, ascending path. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:1994;331-342.
6. Griffiths T.D., Uppenkamp S., Johnsrude I., Josephs O., Patterson R.D. Encoding of the temporal regularity of sound in the human brainstem. Nat. Neurosci. 4:2001;633-637.
7. Gutschalk A., Mase R., Roth R., Ille N., Rupp A., Hähnel S., Picton T.W., Scherg M. Deconvolution of 40 Hz steady-state fields reveals two overlapping source activities of the human auditory cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 110:1999;856-868.
8. Hansen, P.C.H., 1992. Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems. Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
9. Hansen, P.C.H., 1998. Regularisation Tools. A Matlab Package for Analysis and Solution of Discrete Ill-posed Problems. http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~pch.
10. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6:1979;65-70.
11. Kohlrausch A., Sander A. Phase effects in masking related to dispersion in the inner ear. II. Masking period matterns of short targets. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:1995;1817-1829.
12. Liègeois-Chauvel C., Musolino A., Badier J.M., Marquis P., Chauvel P. Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 92:1994;204-214.
13. Meddis R. Simulation of auditory-neural transduction: further studies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83:1988;1056-1063.
14. Oxenham A., Dau T. Reconciling frequency selectivity and phase effects in masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110:2001;1525-1538.
15. Oxenham A., Dau T. Towards a measure of auditory-filter phase response. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110:2001;3169-3178.
16. Patterson, R.D., Robinson, K., Holdsworth, J., McKeown, D., Zhang, C., Allerhand, M., 1992. Complex sounds and auditory images. In: Cazals, Y., Demany, L., Horner, K. (Eds.), Auditory Physiology and Perception. Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 429-446.
17. Patterson R.D., Allerhand M.H., Giguère C. Time-domain modelling of peripheral auditory processing: a modular architecture and a software platform. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1995;1890-1894.
18. Rupp A., Hack S., Gutschalk A., Schneider P., Picton T.W., Scherg M. Fast temporal interactions in human auditory cortex. NeuroReport. 11:2000;3731-3736.
19. Scherg M., Volk S.A. Frequency specificity of simultaneously recorded early and middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56:1983;443-452.
20. Scherg, M., von Cramon, D., 1990. Dipole source potentials of the auditory cortex in normal subjects and in patients with temporal lobe lesions. In: Hoke, M. (Ed.), Advances in Audiology. Karger, Basel, pp. 165-192.
21. Scherg, M., Hari, R., Hämäläinen, M., 1989. Frequency-specific sources of the auditory N19-P30-P50 response detected by a multiple source analysis of evoked magnetic fields and potentials. In: Williamson, S.J., Hoke, M., Sroink, G. (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetis. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 97-100.
22. Schneider, P., 2001. Source Activity and Tonotopic Organization of the Auditory Cortex in Musicians and Non-Musicians. PhD Thesis. University of Heidelberg.
23. Shore S.E., Nuttall A.L. High-synchrony cochlear compound action potentials evoked by rising frequency-swept tone bursts. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78:1985;1286-1295.
24. Shore S.E., Clopton B.M., Yolande N. Unit responses in ventral cochlear nucleus reflect cochlear coding of rapid frequency sweeps. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82:1987;471-478.
25. Sprent, P., Smeeton, N.C. (2001). Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods. 3rd Edn. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, FL.
26. Tikhonov A.N. Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Sov. Math. Dokl. 4:1963;1035-1038.
27. Uppenkamp S., Fobel S., Patterson R.D. The effects of temporal asymmetry on the detection and perception of short chirps. Hear. Res. 158:2001;71-83.
28. von Békésy, G., 1960. Experiments in Hearing. McGraw-Hill, New York.
29. Webster, D.E., 1992. An overview of mammalian pathways with an emphasis on humans. In: Webster, D.E., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (Eds.). The Mammalian Pathway: Neuroanatomy. Springer, New York, pp. 1-22.
30. Wegner O., Dau T. Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111:2002;1318-1329.
31. Wegner, O., Dau, T., Kollmeier, B., 1999. On the relationship between auditory evoked potentials and psychophysical loudness. In: Dau, T., Hohmann, V., Kollmeier, B. (Eds.), Psychophysics, Physiology and Models of Hearing. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 59-62.
32. Wiegrebe L., Winter I.M. Temporal representation of iterated rippled noise as a function of delay and sound level in the ventral cochlear nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 85:2001;1206-1219.