Genetic distance among selected cotton genotypes and its relationship with F2 performance

Crop Science

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1841-1847

  Gutierrez O A ^a   Basu, S ^b   Saha, S ^a,d   Jenkins, J N ^c   Shoemaker, D B ^b   Cheatham, C L ^a   McCarty Jr , J C ^a  

^a CROP SCIENCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^d Delta and Pine Land Company   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; GOSSYPIUM; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 0036888704     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2002.1841     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bernardo, R. 1992. Relationship between single-cross performance and molecular marker heterozygosity. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:628-634.
2. Boppenmaier, J.A., E. Melchinger, G. Seitz, H.H. Geiger, and R.G. Herrmann. 1993. Genetic diversity for RFLPs in European maize inbreds. III. Performance of crosses within versus between heterotic groups for grain traits. Plant Breed. 111:217-226.
3. Bowman, D.T. 2000. Attributes of public and private cotton breeding programs. J. Cotton Sci. 4:130-136.
4. Bowman, D.T., O.L. May, and D.S. Calhoun. 1996. Genetic base of upland cotton cultivars released between 1970 and 1990. Crop Sci. 36:577-581.
5. Calhoun, D.S., D. T. Bowman, and O. L. May. 1994. Pedigrees of upland and pima cotton cultivars released between 1970 and 1990. Bull. 1017. Miss. Agric. and For. Exp. Stn. Mississippi State, MS.
6. Charcosset, A., M. Lefort-Buson, and A. Gallais. 1991. Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: A theoretical computation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:571-575.
7. Cheatham. C.L. 2001. Genetics and Combining Ability of Yield and Fiber Properties Associated with Selected American and Australian Cotton Genotypes. Ph.D. diss. (Diss. Abstr. Int. 02B:608), Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS.
8. Cheres, M.T., J.F. Miller, J.M. Crane, and S.J. Knapp. 2000. Genetic distance as a predictor of heterosis and hybrid performance within and between heterotic groups in sunflower. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:889-894.
9. Dudley, J.W., M.A. Saghai Maroof, and G.K. Rufener. 1991. Molecular markers and grouping of parents in maize breeding programs. Crop Sci. 31:718-723.
10. Godshalk, E.B., M. Lee, and K.R. Lamkey. 1990. Relationship of restriction fragment length polymorphisms to single-cross hybrid performance of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:273-280.
11. Iqbal, M.J., N. Aziz, N.A. Saeed, Y. Zafar, and K.A. Malik. 1997. Genetic diversity evaluation of some elite cotton varieties by RAPD analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:139-144.
12. Lanza, L.L.B., C.L. de Souza Jr., L.M.M. Ottoboni, M.L.C. Vieira, and A.P. de Souza. 1997. Genetic distance of inbred lines and prediction of maize single-cross performance using RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:1023-1030.
13. Lee, M., E.B Godshalk, K.R. Lamkey, and W.W. Woodman. 1989. Association of restriction fragment length polymorphism among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci. 29: 1067-1071.
14. Li, C.D., B.G. Rossnagel, and G.J. Scoles. 2000. The development of oat microsatellite markers and their use in identifying relationships among Avena species and oat cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:1259-1268.
15. Littell, R.C., G.A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup, and R.D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
16. Liu, S., R.G. Cantrell, J.C. McCarty, Jr., and J.M. Stewart. 2000a. Simple sequence repeat-based assessment of genetic diversity in cotton race stock accessions. Crop Sci. 40:1459-1469.
17. Liu, S., S. Saha, D. Stelly, B. Burr, and R.G. Cantrell. 2000b. Chromosomal assignment of microsatellite in cotton. J. Hered. 91:326-332.
18. Liu, X.C., and J.L. Wu. 1998. SSR heterogenic patterns of parents for making and predicting heterosis in rice breeding. Mol. Breed. 4:263-268.
19. Manjarrez-Sandoval, P., T.E. Carter, Jr., D.M. Webb, and J.W. Burton. 1997. RFLP genetic similarity estimates and coefficient of parentage as genetic variance predictors for soybean yield. Crop Sci. 37:698-703.
20. Martin, J.M., L.E. Talbert, S.P. Lanning, and N.K. Blake. 1995. Hybrid performance in wheat as related to parental diversity. Crop Sci. 35:104-108.
21. Melchinger, A.E. 1993. Use of RFLP markers for analysis of genetic relationships among breeding materials and prediction of hybrid performance, p. 621-628. In D.R. Buxton et al. (ed.) International Crop Science I. ASSA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison WI,
22. Melchinger, A.E., M. Lee, K.R. Lamkey, and W.L. Woodman. 1990. Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms: Relation to estimated genetic effects in maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 30:1033-1040.
23. Meredith, W.R., Jr. 1990. Yield and fiber-quality potential for second-generation cotton hybrids. Crop Sci. 30:1045-1048.
24. Meredith, W.R., Jr., and J.S. Brown. 1998. Heterosis and combining ability of cotton originating from different regions of the United States. J. Cotton Sci. 2:77-84.
25. Multani, D.S., and B.R. Lyon. 1995. Genetic fingerprinting of Australian cotton cutivars with RAPD markers. Genome 38:1005-1008.
26. Nei, M., and W. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 76:5269-5273.
27. Reddy, O. U. K., A.E. Pepper, I Abdurakhmonov, S. Saha, J.N. Jenkins, T. Brooks, Y. Bolek, and K.M. El-Zik. 2001. New dinucleotide and trinucleotide microsatellite marker resources for cotton genome research. J. Cotton Sci. 5:103-113.
28. Saghai Maroof, M.A., G.P. Yang, Q. Zhang, and K.A. Gravois. 1997. Correlation between molecular marker distance and hybrid performance in U.S. southern long grain rice. Crop Sci. 37:145-150.
29. Saha, S., F. E. Callahan, D. A. Dollar, and J. B. Creech. 1997. Effect of lyopholization of cotton tissue on the quality of extractable DNA, RNA and protein. J. Cotton Sci. 1:11-14.
30. Saitou, N., and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-423.
31. SAS Institute. 2000. The SAS System for Windows Version 8 (TsM1). SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
32. Senior, L.M., J.P. Murphy, M.M. Goodman, and C.W. Stuber. 1998. Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. Crop Sci. 38:1088-1098.
33. Smith, J.S.C., E.C.L. Chin, H. Shu, O.S. Smith, S.J. Wall, M.L. Senior, S.E. Mitchell, S. Kresovich, and J. Ziegle. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): Comparisons with data from RLFPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:163-173.
34. Smith, J.S.C., and O.S. Smith. 1992. Fingerprinting crop varieties. Adv. Agron. 47:85140.
35. 1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:833-840.
36. Swofford, D.L 2000. PAUP* 4.0 Beta Version. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods) Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
37. 2 hybrids, p. 583-587. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Res. Conf. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN.
38. 2 hybrids of host plant germplasm and cotton cultivars: I. Heterosis and combining ability for lint yield and yield components. Crop Sci. 33:700-705.
39. 2 hybrids of host plant germplasm and cotton cultivars: II. Heterosis and combining ability for fiber properties. Crop Sci. 33:706-710.
40. Tatineni, V., R.G. Cantrell, and D.D. Davis. 1996. Genetic diversity in elite cotton germplasm determined by morphological characteristics and RAPDs. Crop Sci. 36:186-192.
41. Ulloa, M., W.R. Meredith, Jr., R. Percy, and H. Moser. 1999. Genetic variability within improved germplasm of Gossypium hirsutum and G. barbadense cottons, p. 73. In Agronomy abstracts. ASA, Madison, WI.
42. Van Esbroeck, G., D.T. Bowman, D.S. Calhoun, and O.L. May. 1998. Changes in the genetic diversity of cotton in the USA from 1970 to 1995. Crop Sci. 38:33-37.
43. Wendel, J.F., C.L. Brubaker, and A.E. Percival. 1992. Genetic diversity in Gossypium hirsutum and the origin of upland cotton. Am. J. Bot. 79:1291-1310.
44. Xiao, J., J. Li, L. Yuan, S.R. McCouch, and S.D. Tanksley. 1996. Genetic diversity and its relationship to hybrid performance and heterosis in rice as revealed by PCR-based markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92:637-643.
45. Young, N.D. 1999. A cautiously optimistic version for marker-assisted breeding. Mol. Breed. 5:505-510.
46. Zhang, Q., Z.Q. Zhou, G.P. Yang, C.G. Xu, K.D. Liu, and M.A. Saghai Maroof. 1996. Molecular marker heterozygosity and hybrid performance in indica and japonica rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 1218-1224.