Three-dimensional molecular descriptors and a novel QSAR method

Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 161-170

  Wildman, Scott A ^a   Crippen, Gordon M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Atomic physicochemical properties; Computer aided drug design; Pharmacophore; Structure activity relationships; Three dimensional QSAR

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; NUCLEAR ENERGY;

ATOM PAIR DISTANCES;

ATOMIC PHYSICS;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ATOMIC PARTICLE; ENERGY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DESIGN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; THEORETICAL MODEL;

LIGAND; STEROID; TRANSCORTIN;

CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DESIGN; LIGANDS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN BINDING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; STEROIDS; TRANSCORTIN;

EID: 0036888689     PISSN: 10933263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1093-3263(02)00147-X     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wildman S.A., Crippen G.M. Prediction of physicochemical parameters by atomic contributions. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 39:1999;868-873.
2. Wildman S.A., Crippen G.M. Evaluation of ligand overlap by atomic parameters. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41:2001;446-450.
3. Mankino S., Kuntz I.D. Automated flexible ligand docking and its application for database search. J. Comp. Chem. 18:1997;1812-1825.
4. Jones G., Willett P., Glen R.C., Leach A.R., Taylor R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 267:1997;727-748.
5. Goodsell D.S., Olson A.J. Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins. 8:1990;195-202.
6. C. Wermuth, T. Langer, Pharmacophore identification, in: H. Kubinyi (Ed.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, pp. 117-136.
7. V.E. Golender, E.R. Vorpagel, Computer-assisted pharmacophore identification, in: H. Kubinyi (Ed.), 3D QSAR in Drug Design: Theory, Methods and Applications, ESCOM, Leiden, 1993, pp. 137-149.
8. Klebe G. The use of composite crystal-field environments in molecular recognition and the de novo design of protein ligands. J. Mol. Biol. 237:1994;212-235.
9. Schneider G., Lee M.L., Stahl M., Schneider P. De novo design of molecular architectures by evolutionary assembly of drug-derived building blocks. J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Design. 14:2000;487-494.
10. Van Drie J.H. Strategies for the determination of pharmacophoric 3D database queries. J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Design. 11:1997;39-52.
11. Walters W.P., Stahl M.T., Murcko M.A. Virtual screening - an overview. Drug Disc. Today. 3:1998;160-178.
12. Stahl M.T., Rarey M. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. J. Med. Chem. 44:2001;1035-1042.
13. Crippen G.M. VRI: 3D QSAR at variable resolution. J. Comput. Chem. 20:1999;1577-1585.
14. Molecular Operating Environment, 2000, Chemical Computing Group, Montreal, Canada.
15. Gasteiger J., Marsili M. Iterative partial equilization of orbital electronegativitity - a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron. 36:1980;3219-3228.
16. Ghose A.K., Crippen G.M. Geometrically feasible binding modes of a flexible ligand molecule at the receptor site. J. Comput. Chem. 6:1985;350-359.
17. S.A. Wildman, G.M. Crippen, 2002, manuscript in preparation.
18. Wold S., Ruhe A., Wold H., Dunn W.J. The colinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to generalized inverses. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 5:1984;735-743.
19. Cramer R.D. III, Patterson D.E., Bunce J.D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110:1988;5959-5967.
20. Coats E.A. The CoMFA steroids as a benchmark dataset for development of 3D QSAR methods. Perspect. Drug. Discov. Design. 12:1998;199-213.
21. Saunders M., Houk K.N., Wu Y.D., Still W.C., Lipton M., Chang G., Guida W.C. Conformations of cycloheptadecane - a comparison of methods for conformational searching. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:1990;1419-1427.
22. H. Kubinyi, A general view on similarity and QSAR studies, in: H. van de Waterbeemd, B. Testa, G. Folkers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships, Computer-Assisted Lead Finding and Optimization, VCH, Basel, 1997, pp. 7-28.