Standard reference materials for cements

Cement and Concrete Research

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 1899-1906

  Morin, V ^a,d   Cohen Tenoudji, F ^a   Feylessoufi, A ^b   Richard, P ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^d LAFARGE CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (France)

Author keywords

Calcium aluminate cement; Elemental analysis; Portland cement; Spectroscopy; X ray fluorescence

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; DATA REDUCTION; FLUORESCENCE; MATERIALS TESTING; SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS; X RAYS;

STANDARD REFERENCE MATERIALS (SRM);

CEMENTS;

EID: 0036888644     PISSN: 00088846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00896-7     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kirby R.K., Kanare H.M. Standard reference materials: Portland cement chemical composition standards (blending, packaging, and testing). NBS Spec. Publ. 260-110. 1988;U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 88 pp.
2. ASTM C 114-00 Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Hydraulic Cement. Annu. Book ASTM Stand. vol. 04.01:2001;American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA. 638 pp.
3. May W., Parris R., Beck C., Fassett J., Greenberg R., Guenther F., Kramer G., Wise S., Gills T., Colbert J., Gettings R., MacDonald B. Definitions of Terms and Modes Used at NIST for Value-Assignment of Reference Materials for Chemical Measurements. NIST Spec. Publ. 260-136. 2000;U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. 16 pp.
4. ASTM Spec. Tech. Pub. 15D, ASTM Manual on Presentation of Data and Control Chart Analysis, Lancaster, PA, 1976, pp. 92-93.
5. Bertin E.P. Principles and Practice of X-Ray Spectrometric Analysis. 2nd ed. 1975;Plenum, New York.
6. J.R. Sieber, Matrix-independent XRF methods for certification of standard reference materials, Adv. X-ray Anal., submitted for publication Sept. 2001.
7. Mandel J., Linnig F.J. Study of accuracy in chemical analysis using linear calibration curves. Anal. Chem. 29:1957;743.
8. Spurrier J.D. Kotz S., Read C.B. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. vol. 9:1988;651-653 Wiley, New York.
9. Nettles S.H. Effect of calibration specimen preparation techniques on narrow range X-ray fluorescence calibration accuracy. Huang T.C. Adv. X-ray Anal. vol. 43:2000;424-428 ICDD, Newtown Square, PA.
10. Staats G. Synthetic macro-reference samples for the calibration of instruments in inorganic bulk analysis. Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem. 334:1989;326-330.
11. Staats G., Strieder S. Validation of sulfide-bearing certified reference samples by primary calibration as applied to X-ray fluorescence. X-ray Spectrom. 22(3):1993;132-137.
12. Rukhin A.L., Vangel M.G. Estimation of a common mean and weighted means statistics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 93(441):1998;303-308.
13. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, ISBN 92-67-10188-9, 1st ed., ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993; see also B.N. Taylor and C.E. Kuyatt, Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, NIST Technical Note 1297, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1994, available at http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/.
14. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, ISBN 92-67-10188-9, 1st ed., ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993; see also B.N. Taylor and C.E. Kuyatt, Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, NIST Technical Note 1297, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1994, available at http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/.