Believing others: Pros and cons

Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 142, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 179-203

  Matsubara, Shigeo ^a   Yokoo, Makoto ^a  

^a NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Agents; Cooperation; Reciprocity; Relationships; Trust

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; PROBABILITY; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOFTWARE AGENTS;

AGENT BEHAVIORS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 0036888596     PISSN: 00043702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00289-8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Armstrong A.A., Durfee E.H. Mixing and memory: Emergent cooperation in an information marketplace. Proc. Third International Conference on Multiagent Systems, Los Alamitos, CA. 1998;34-41.
2. Axelrod R. The Evolution of Cooperation. 1984;Basic Books, New York.
3. Azoulay-Schwartz R., Kraus S. Stable strategies for sharing information among agents. Proc. IJCAI-01, Seattle, WA. 2001;1128-1134.
4. Binmore K. Playing Fair: Game Theory and the Social Contract. 1994;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Biswas A., Sen S., Debnath S. Limiting deception in groups of social agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence (Special Issue on Deception, Fraud, and Trust in Agent Societies). 14:(8):2000;785-797.
6. Boyd R. Is the repeated Prisoner's Dilemma a good model of reciprocal altruism? Ethol. Sociobiology. 9:1988;211-222.
7. Bradshaw J.M. Software Agents. 1997;AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA.
8. Briggs W., Cook D. Flexible social laws. Proc. IJCAI-95, Montreal, Quebec. 1995;688-693.
9. CACM July 1994 issue: Communications of the ACM. Special Issue on Intelligent Agents. 37:(7):July 1994.
10. CACM March 1999 issue Communications of the ACM. Special Issue on Multiagent Systems on the Net and Agents in E-commerce. 42:(3):March 1999.
11. Castelfranchi C., Conte R., Paolucci M. Normative reputation and the costs of compliance. J. Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. 1:(3):1998.
12. Castelfranchi C., Falcone R. Principles of trust for MAS: Cognitive autonomy, social importance, and quantification. Proc. Third International Conference on Multiagent Systems, Los Alamitos, CA. 1998;72-79.
13. Cesta A., Miceli M. Help under risky conditions: Robustness of the social attitude and system performance. Proc. Second International Conference on Multiagent Systems, Menlo Park, CA. 1996;18-25.
14. Dutta P.S., Sen S. Identifying partners and sustenance of stable, effective coalitions. Proc. 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, New York. 2001;23-24.
15. Glass A., Grosz B. Socially conscious decision-making. Proc. Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, New York. 2000;217-224.
16. Goldman C., Rosenschein J.S. Emergent coordination through the use of cooperative state-changing rules. Working Papers of the 12th International Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence. 1993;171-185.
17. Goldman C., Rosenschein J.S. Emergent coordination through the use of cooperative state-changing rules. Proc. AAAI-94, Seattle, WA. 1994;408-413.
18. Hoffman E., McCabe K.A., Smith V.L. Behavioral foundations of reciprocity: Experimental economics and evolutionary psychology. Economic Inquiry. 36:(3):1998;335-352.
19. Huhns M.N., Singh M.P. Readings in Agents. 1997;Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
20. Jennings N., Sycara K., Wooldridge M. A roadmap of agent research and development. Internat. J. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 1:(1):1998;7-38.
21. Krebs D. Altruism - An examination of the concept and a review of the literature. Psychological Bull. 73:(4):1970;258-302.
22. Martinez-Coll J., Hirshleifer J. The limits of reciprocity. Rationality and Society. 3:1991;35-64.
23. Rapoport A. Prisoner's dilemma. Eatwell J., Milgate M., Newman P., The New Palgrave: Game Theory. 1989;199-204 Macmillan, London.
24. Sandholm T., Lesser V. Coalitions among Computationally bounded agents. Artificial Intelligence. 94:(1):1997;99-137.
25. Schmitz D. Reasons for Altruism. Social Philosophy and Policy. 10:(1):1993;52-68.
26. Sekaran M., Sen S. To help or not to help. Proc. Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ. 1995;736-741.
27. Sen S. Reciprocity: A foundational principle for promoting cooperative behavior among self-interested agents. Proc. Second International Conference on Multiagent Systems, Menlo Park, CA. 1996;315-321.
28. Sen S., Biswas A. Effects of misconception on reciprocative agents. Proc. Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents, New York. 1998;430-435.
29. Sen S., Biswas A., Debnath S. Believing others: Pros and cons. Proc. Fourth International Conference on Multiagent Systems, Los Alamitos, CA. 2000;279-285.
30. Shoham Y., Tennenholtz M. On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agent societies (Preliminary Report). Proc. AAAI-92, San Jose, CA. 1992;276-281.
31. Sullivan D.G., Grosz B., Kraus S. Intention reconciliation by collaborative agents. Proc. Fourth International Conference on Multiagent Systems, Los Alamitos, CA. 2000;293-300.
32. Sutton R.S., Barto A.G. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. 1998;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
33. Trivers R. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology. 46:1972;35-57.
34. Weiß G. Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. 1999;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Wellman M.P. A market-oriented programming environment and its application to distributed multicommodity flow problems. J. Artificial Intelligence Res. 1:(1):1993;1-22.