The role of visual perception in data visualization

Journal of Visual Languages and Computing

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 601-622

  Dastani, Mehdi ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036888248     PISSN: 1045926X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jvlc.2002.0235     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J. Bertin, (1981) Graphics and Graphic Information-Processing. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin New York.
2. S.K. Card, Mackinglay, J.D. & B. Shneiderman (1999) Readings in Information Visualization-Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
3. J. Mackinlay (1986) Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Transactions on Graphics 5, 110-141.
4. E.R. Tufte (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
5. E.R. Tufte (1990) Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
6. M. Twyman (1979) A schema for the study of graphic language. In: Processing of Visible Language (P.A. Kolers, M.E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma, eds), Vol. 1. Plenum Press, New York.
7. W J. Mitchell (1993) A computational view of design creativity. In: Modeling Creativity and Knowledge-based Creative Design (J.S. Gero & M.L. Maher, eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 25-42.
8. M. Petre & T.R.G. Green (1993) Learning to read graphics: Some evidence that 'seeing' an information display is an acquired Skill. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 4, 55-70.
9. S.S. Stevens (1946) On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103, 667-680.
10. M. Dastani (1998) Languages of perception. Ph.D. thesis, Institute of Logic, Language, and Computation (ILLC), The Netherlands.
11. J. Marks & E. Reiter (1990) Avoiding unwanted conversational implicatures in text and graphics. Proceeding AAAI, Menlo Park, CA.
12. J. Pfanzagl (1968) Theory of Measurement. Physica-Verlag, Würzburg-Wien.
13. K. Reichenberger, T. Kamps & G. Golovchinsky (1995) Towards a generative theory of diagram design. In: IEEE Proceedings on Information Visualization (N. Gershon & S. Eick, eds), October 1995. IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD, pp. 11-18.
14. Y. Engelhardt, J. de Bruin, T. Janssen, & R. Scha (1996) The visual grammar of information graphics. Artificial Intelligence in Design (AID'96), in the Workshop on Visual Representation, Reasoning and Interaction in Design, 24-27 June, Stanford University, California.
15. T.M. Kamps (1997) A constructive theory for diagram design and its algorithmic implementation. Ph.D. thesis.
16. W.R. Garner (1974) The Processing of Information and Structure. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Potomac, MD.
17. R.N. Shepard (1991) Integrality versus separability of stimulus dimensions: from an early convergence of evidence to a proposed theoretical basis. In: The Perception of Structure (G.R. Lockhead & J.R. Pomerantz, eds). American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 53-71.
18. P. Van der Helm (1994) The dynamics of prägnanz. Psychological Research 56, 224-236.
19. C.A. Gurr (1999) Effective diagrammatic communication: syntactic, semantic and pragmatic issues. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 10, 4.
20. D. Wang, & H. Zeevat (1998) A syntax-directed approach to picture semantics. In: Visual Language Theory: Towards a Human-Computer Interaction Perspective. (B. Meyer & K. Marriott, eds) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 307-324.