Policy uses of particulate exposure estimates

Chemosphere

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 947-959

  Brauer, Michael ^a   Evans, John S ^b   Keith Florig, H ^c   Phonboon, Kanchanasak ^b,d   Saksena, Sumeet ^e,g   Song, Guojun ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Health Systems Research Institute   (Thailand)

^e EAST WEST CENTER   (United States)

^f RENMIN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

^g THE ENERGY AND RESOURCES INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Air pollution; Exposure efficiency; Intake fraction; PM10; PM2.5

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; EPIDEMIOLOGY;

PARTICULATE EXPOSURE;

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

CARBON MONOXIDE; NITROGEN OXIDE;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; PARTICULATE MATTER; POLLUTION EXPOSURE;

AIR POLLUTION; AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; AIR QUALITY; AIRBORNE PARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MONITORING; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; EXHAUST GAS; HUMAN; MICROENVIRONMENT; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICULATE MATTER; PERSONAL MONITORING; POLICY; POLITICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 0036888103     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00238-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. 2.5) from airport visibility data in California. J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 5 (2), 161-180.
2. Buzorius, G., Hameri, K., Pekkanen, J., Kulmala, M., 1999. Spatial variation of aerosol number concentration in Helsinki city. Atmos. Environ. 33, 553-565.
3. Dzubay, T.G., Stevens, R.K., Lewis, C.W., 1982. Visibility and aerosol composition in Houston, Texas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16, 514-525.
4. Fischhoff, B., Watson, S., Hope, C., 1984. Defining risk. Policy Sci. 17, 123-139.
5. Griffing, G.W., 1980. Relationships between the prevailing visibility, nephelometer scattering coefficient, and sunphotometer turbidity coefficient. Atmos. Environ. 14, 577-584.
6. Harrison, R., Jones, M., Collins, G., 1999. Measurements of the physical properties of particles in the urban atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. 33, 309-321.
7. 2.5 and Visibility Data, Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA), Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA, February 1995, http://capita.wustl.edu/CAPITA/DataSets/FM_ VISIB/FMVISIB.HTML (accessed November 11, 1999).
8. Janssen, N.A.H., Van Mansom, D.F.M., Van der Jagt, K., Harssema, H., Hoek, G., 1997. Mass concentration and elemental composition of airborne particulate matter at street and background locations. Atmos. Environ. 31, 1185-1193.
9. Jantunen, M., Hänninen, O., Koistinen, K., Hashim, J.H., 2002. Fine PM measurements: Personal and indoor air monitoring. Chemosphere (this issue - PII: S0045-6535(02)00272-2).
10. Ozkaynak, H., Schatz, A.D., Thurston, G.D., Isaacs, R.D., Husar, R.G., 1985. Relationships between aerosol extinction coefficients derived from airport visual range observations and alternative measures of airborne particle mass. J. Air Pollut. Control. Assoc. 35, 1176-1185.
11. Smith, K.R., 1995. The Potential of Human Exposure Assessment for Air Pollution Regulation, Geneva, World Health Organization, WHO/EHG/95.9.
12. Stevens, R.K., Dzubay, T.G., Lewis, C.W., Shaw, R.W., 1984. Source apportionment methods applied to the determination of origin of ambient aerosols that affect visibility in forested areas. Atmos. Environ. 18, 261-272.
13. van Vliet, P., Knape, M., de Hartog, J., Janssen, N., Harssema, H., Brunekreef, B., 1997. Motor vehicle exhaust and chronic respiratory symptoms in children living near freeways. Environ. Res. 74 (2), 122-132.