Big five domain and gender as determinants of rater agreement: A comparison based on self- and peer-rating on the Polish Adjective List

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 33, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1265-1277

  Szarota, Piotr ^a   Zawadzki, Bogdan ^b   Strelau, Jan ^c  

^a POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Big five model; Gender differences; Personality assessment; Temperament

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036887808     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00011-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1994). Temperament and the Big Five factors of personality. In C. F. Halverson, G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 69-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Buss, A. H., & Plomin, R. (1984). Temperament: early developing personality traits. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Funder, D. C. (1993). Judgments of personality and personality itself. In K. H. Craik, R. Hogan, & R. N. Wolfe (Eds.), Fifty years of personality psychology (pp. 207-214). New York and London: Plenum Press.
4. Funder, D. C., & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: properties associated with interjudge agreement Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
5. Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., DiGeronimo, K., & Biek, M. (1992). Differential accuracy in person perception across traits: examination of a functional hypothesis Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 688-698.
6. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": the Big-Five factor structure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
7. Hall, J. A. (1987). On explaining gender differences: the case of nonverbal communication. In P. Shaver, & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender (pp. 57-78). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Harman, H. H. (1970). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
9. Hofstee, W. K. B. (1991). The concept of personality and temperament. In J. Strelau, & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Explorations in temperament. International perspectives on theory and measurement (pp. 177-190). London-New York: Plenum Press.
10. Hofstee, W. K. B. (1994). Who should own the definition of personality? European Journal of Personality, 8, 149-162.
11. John, O. P., & Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self Journal of Personality, 61, 521-551.
12. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. (1971). The actor and the observer: divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
13. Kenny, D. A. (1991). A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception Psychological Review, 98, 155-163.
14. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hrebickova, M., Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sanchez-Bernardos, M. L., Kusdil, M. E., Woodfield, R., Saunders, P. R., & Smith, P. B. (2000). Nature over nurture: temperament, personality, and life span development Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173-186.
15. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
16. Norman, W. T., & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681-691.
17. Piotrowska, A. (1997). Z badan nad inteligencja spoleczna [Researching social intelligence] Psychologia Wychowawcza, 40, 289-301.
18. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
19. Shraugher, J. S., & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: through the looking glass darkly Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549-573.
20. Shweder, R. A., & D'Andrade, R. G. (1979). Accurate reflection or systematic distortion? A reply to Block, Weiss, and Thorne Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1075-1084.
21. Strelau, J. (1998). Temperament: a psychological perspective. New York: Plenum.
22. Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (1996). Temperament Dimensions as Related to the Giant Three and the Big Five factors: a psychometric approach. In A. V. Bruslinsky, & T. N. Ushakova (Eds.), V. D. Nebylitsyn: Life and scientific creativity (pp. 260-281). Moscow: Ladomir.
23. Strelau, J., & Zawadzki, B. (1997). Temperament and Personality: Eysenck's Three Superfactors as Related to Temperamental Dimensions. In H. Nyborg (Ed.), The Scientific Study of Human Nature: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck at Eighty (pp. 68-91). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
24. Szarota, P. (1996). Taxonomy of Polish personality-descriptive adjectives of the highest frequency of use Polish Psychological Bulletin, 27, 343-351.
25. Van Heck, G. L. (1991). Temperament and the person-situation debate. In J. Strelau, & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Explorations in temperament. International perspectives on theory and measurement (pp. 163-176). London and New York: Plenum Press.
26. Winquist, L. A., Mohr, C. D., & Kenny, D. A. (1998). The female positivity effect in the perception of others Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 370-388.
27. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.