Transcription factors do it together: The hows and whys of studying protein-protein interactions

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 7, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 531-534

  Immink, Richard G H ^a   Angenent, Gerco C ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA;

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; MADS DOMAIN PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PLANT; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; YEAST;

DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; MADS DOMAIN PROTEINS; PLANTS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES; YEASTS;

EID: 0036886256     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02343-9     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796-816
2. Uetz, P. et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-627
3. Theissen, G. et al. (2000) A short history of MADS-box genes in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 115-149
4. Smyth, D. (2000) A reverse trend - MADS functions revealed. Trends Plant Sci. 5, 315-317
5. Egea-Cortines, M. et al. (1999) Ternary complex formation between the MADS-box proteins SQUAMOSA, DEFICIENS and GLOBOSA is involved in the control of floral architecture in Antirrhinum majus. EMBO J. 18, 5370-5379
6. Honma, T. and Goto, K. (2001) Complexes of MADS-box proteins are sufficient to convert leaves into floral organs. Nature 409, 525-529
7. Fashena, S.J. et al. (2000) The continued evolution of two-hybrid screening approaches in yeast: how to outwit different preys with different baits. Gene 250, 1-14
8. Legrain, P. et al. (2001) Protein-protein interaction maps: a lead towards cellular functions. Trends Genet. 17, 346-352
9. Fang, Y. et al. (2002) Development of a high-throughput yeast two-hybrid screening system to study protein-protein interactions in plants. Mol. Genet. Genomics 267, 142-153
10. Moon, Y-H. et al. (1999) Determination of the motif responsible for interaction between the rice APETAL1/AGAMOUS-LIKE9 family proteins using a yeast two-hybrid system. Plant Physiol. 120, 1193-1203
11. Pelaz, S. et al. (2001) APETALA1 and SEPALLATA3 interact to promote flower development. Plant J. 26, 385-394
12. Hirst, M. et al. (2001) A two-hybrid system for transactivator bait proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 8726-8731
13. Stagljar, I. et al. (1998) A genetic system based on split-ubiquitin for the analysis of interactions between membrane proteins in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5187-5192
14. Reinders, A. et al. (2002) Protein-protein interactions between sucrose transporters of different affinities colocalized in the same enucleate sieve element. Plant Cell 14, 1567-1577
15. Aronheim, A. et al. (1997) Isolation of an AP-1 repressor by a novel method for detecting protein-protein interactions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3094-3102
16. Immink, R.G.H. et al. Analysis of the petunia MADS box transcription factor family. Mol. Genet. Genomics (in press)
17. Subramaniam, R. et al. (2001) Direct visualization of protein interactions in plant cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 769-772
18. Immink, R.G.H. et al. (2002) Analysis of MADS box protein-protein interactions in living plant cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 2416-2421
19. Angenent, G.C. et al. (1994) Co-suppression of the petunia homeotic gene FBP2 affects the identity of the generative meristem. Plant J. 5, 33-44
20. Theissen, G. (2001) Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4, 75-85
21. Ferrándiz, C. et al. (2000) Redundant regulation of meristem identity and plant architecture by FRUITFULL, APETALA1 and CAULIFLOWER. Development 127, 725-734
22. Kater, M.M. et al. (1998) Multiple AGAMOUS homologs from cucumber and petunia differ in their ability to induce reproductive organ fate. Plant Cell 10, 171-182
23. Davies, B. et al. (1999) PLENA and FARINELLI: redundancy and regulatory interactions between two Antirrhinum MADS-box factors controlling flower development. EMBO J. 18, 4023-4034
24. Deane, C.M. et al. (2002) Protein interactions. Two methods for assessment of the reliability of high throughput observations. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 15, 349-356
25. Walhout, J.M.A. et al. (2000) Yeast two-hybrid systems and protein interaction mapping projects for yeast and worm. Yeast 17, 88-94
26. Masiero, S. et al. (2002) Ternary complex formation between MADS-box transcription factors and the histone fold protein NF-YB. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 26429-26435
27. Sundström, J. and Engström, P. (2002) Conifer reproductive development involves B-type MADS box genes with distinct and different activities in male organ primordia. Plant J. 31, 161-169
28. Pelaz, S. et al. (2000) B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 405, 200-203
29. MacBeath, G. et al. (2000) Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science 289, 1760-1763