The moral status of the embryonal stem cell: Inherent or imputed?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 57-59

  Orr, Robert D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEGINNING OF HUMAN LIFE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO RESEARCH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HUMAN; MORALITY; PERSONHOOD; POLICY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; STEM CELL;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

BEGINNING OF HUMAN LIFE; EMBRYO; EMBRYO RESEARCH; EMBRYONIC AND FETAL DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PERSONHOOD; PUBLIC POLICY; STEM CELLS;

EID: 0036884543     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651602317267989     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Fumento, M. 2001. Short on facts. National Review Online, 23 July. Available from: http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-fumento072301.shtml.
2. Green, R. M. 2002. Determining moral status. American Journal of Bioethics 2(1): 20-30.
3. Maienschein, J. 2002. What’s in a name: Embryos, clones, and stem cells. American Journal of Bioethics 2(1): 12-19.
4. Maugh, T. H., II. 2001. Fat may be the answer for many illnesses. Los Angeles Times, 10 April, A.1.
5. Orr, R. D., and C. C. Hook. n.d. Stem cell research: Medical promise vs. moral peril. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, forthcoming.
6. Woodbury, D., E. J. Schwarz, D. J. Prockop, and I. B. Black. 2000. Adult rat and human bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons. Journal of Neuroscience Research 61(4): 364-370.