Improving peer review: A guide for reviewers of biomedical research

Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Volumn 72, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 469-473

  Reidenberg, June W ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH;

EID: 0036881638     PISSN: 00099236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2002.128870     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Reidenberg JW. Understanding the publication process of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991;50:357-62.
2. Reidenberg MM, Reidenberg J. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics annual report 2000. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2001;70:299-301.
3. Statement from the Editors. What should authors expect from the reviewers and the editors of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics? Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997;61:497-8.
4. Reidenberg MM. The quality of clinical research. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1990;47:669-70.
5. Proto AV. Radiology 2000: reviewing for Radiology. Radiology 2000;215:619-21.