Maternal effects and the evolution of behavioral and morphological characters: A literature review indicates the importance of extended maternal care

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 400-405

  Reinhold, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS DNA;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BIRD; BODY WEIGHT; BUTTERFLY; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CHILD PARENT RELATION; EVOLUTION; HYBRID; INHERITANCE; INSECT; LACTATION; MAMMAL; MATERNAL CARE; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; BODY CONSTITUTION; BUTTERFLIES; FEMALE; MALE; MAMMALS; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

ANIMALIA; AVES; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; MAMMALIA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 0036881424     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/93.6.400     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Allemand R and David JR, 1984. Genetic analysis of the circadian oviposition rhythm in Drosophila melanogaster effects of drift in laboratory strains. Behav Genet 14:31-43.
2. Barbato GF and Vasilatos-Younken R, 1991. Sex-linked and maternal effects on growth in chickens. Poult Sci 70:709-718.
3. Bauer SJ and Sokolowski MB, 1985. A genetic analysis of path length and pupation height in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Can J Genet Cytol 27:334-340.
4. Boonstra R and Hochachka WM, 1997. Maternal effects and additive genetic inheritance in the collard lemming Dicrostonyx groenlandicus. Evol Ecol 11: 169-182.
5. Broadhurst PL, 1960. Analysis of a diallele cross. In: Experiments in personality. Vol. 1: Psychogenetics and psychopharmacology (Eysenck HJ, ed). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 71-102.
6. Bruell JH, 1969. Genetics and adaptive significance of emotional defecation in mice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 159:825-830.
7. Byers DL, Platenkamp GAJ, and Shaw RG, 1997. Variation in seed characters in Nemophila menziesii: evidence of a genetic basis for maternal effect. Evolution 51:1445-1456.
8. Carran AB, 1972. Biometrics of reversal learning in mice: II. Diallele cross. J Comp Physiol Psychol 78:466-470.
9. Casares P, Carracedo MC, Piñeiro R, San Miguel E, and Garcia-Florez L, 1992. Genetic basis for female receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster: a diallele study. Heredity 69:400-411.
10. Chai CK, 1956. Analysis of quantitative inheritance of body size in mice. II. Gene action and segregation. Genetics 41:165-178.
11. Cooke P, Jones RM, Mather K, Bonsall GW, and Nelder JA, 1962. Estimating the components of continuous variation. I. Statistical. Heredity 17:115-133.
12. Cousin G, 1955. Essais d'interpretation des calculs relatifs à la transmission d'un caractére partiellement liè au sexe, dans les séries mâles et femelles F1, P x F1 et F1 x P d'une hybridation interspécifique. C R Acad Sci Paris 241:2004-2007.
13. Craig TP, Horner JD, and Itami JK, 2001. Genetics, experience, and host-plant preference in Eurosta solidaginis: implications for host shifts and speciation. Evolution 55:773-782.
14. Cundiff LV, 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding: VIII. Comparative aspects of maternal effects. J Anim Sci 35:1335-1337.
15. Dawson WD, Sagedy MN, En-Yu L, Kass DH, and Crossland JP, 1993. Growth regulation in Peromyscus species hybrids: a test for mitochondrial-nuclear genomic interaction. Growth Dev Aging 57:121-133.
16. Dudek BC and Abbott ME, 1984. A biometrical genetic analysis of ethanol response in selectively bred long-sleep and short-sleep mice. Behav Genet 14:1-19.
17. Ellis SL, Bowen WD, Boness DJ, and Iverson SJ, 2000. Maternal effects on offspring mass and stage of development at birth in the harbour seal, Phoca vitulina. J Mamm Evol 81:1143-1156.
18. Erlenmeyer-Kimling I, Hirsch J, and Weiss JM, 1962. Studies in experimental behavior genetics: III. Selection and hybridization analyses of individual differences in the sign of geotaxis. J Comp Physiol Psychol 55:722-731.
19. Eyles AC and Blackith RE, 1965. Studies on hybridisation in Scolpostethus Fieber (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Evolution 19:465-479.
20. Ferveur J-F, 1991. Genetic control of pheromones in Drosophila simulans. 1. Ngbo, a locus on the second chromosome. Genetics 128:293-301.
21. Ferveur J-F, Cobb M, Boukella H, and Jallon J-M, 1996. World-wide variation in Drosophila melanogaster sex pheromone: behavioural effects, genetic bases and potential evolutionary consequences. Genetica 97: 73-80.
22. Fox CW and Savalli UM, 1998. Inheritance of environmental variation in body size: superparasitism of seeds affects progeny and grandprogeny body size via a nongenetic maternal effect. Evolution 52: 172-182.
23. Fujita O, Annen Y, and Kitaoka A, 1994. Tsukuba high-and low-emotional strains of rats (Rattus norvegicus): an overview. Behav Genet 24:389-415.
24. Gamo S, Nakashima-Tanaka E, and Ogaki M, 1980. Inheritance of halothane resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Jpn J Genet 55:133-140.
25. Gil D, Graves J, Hazon N, and Wells A, 1999. Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286:126-129.
26. Glover TJ, Campbell M, Robbins P, and Roelofs W, 1990. Sex-linked control of sex pheromone behavioral responses in European corn-borer moths (Ostrinia nubialis) confirmed with TPI marker gene. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 17:67-77.
27. Gregory KE, Laster DB, Cundiff LV, Koch RM, and Smith GM, 1978. Heterosis and breed maternal and transmitted effects in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 47: 1042-1053.
28. Gregory KE and Maurer RR, 1991. Prenatal and postnatal contributions to reproductive, maternal, and size-related traits of beef cattle. J Anim Sci 69:961-976.
29. Gregory KE, Swiger LA, Koch RM, Sumption J, Ingalls JE, Rowden WW, and Rothlisberger JA, 1966. Heterosis effects on growth rate of beef heifers. J Anim Sci 25:290-298.
30. Grula JW and Taylor OR, 1979. The inheritance of pheromone production in the sulphur butterflies Colias eurytheme and C philodice. Heredity 42: 359-371.
31. Haring F, Steinbach J, and Scheven B, 1966. Untersuchungen über den mütterlichen Einfluß auf die prä- und post-natale Entwicklung von Schweinen extrem unterschiedlicher Größe Tierz Züchtungsbiol 82: 37-53.
32. Hastings IM and Veerkamp RF, 1993. The genetic basis of response in mouse lines divergently selected for body weight or fat content. I. The relative contributions of autosomal and sex-linked genes. Genet Res Camb 62:169-175.
33. He Y and Oshiki T, 1984. Study on cross breeding of a robust silkworm race for summer and autumn rearing in a low latitude area in China. J Seric Sci Jpn 53:320-324.
34. Heath DD, Fox CW, and Heath JW, 1999. Maternal effects on offspring size: variation through early development of Chinook salmon. Evolution 53: 1605-1611.
35. Hockham LR, Graves JA, and Ritchie MG, 2001. Variable maternal control of facultative egg diapause in the bushcricket Ephippiger ephippiger. Ecol Entomol 26:143-147.
36. Hoffmann AA and Parsons PA, 1989. Selection for increased desiccation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster: additive genetic control and correlated responses for other stresses. Genetics 122: 837-845.
37. Hutchinson EW and Rose MR, 1991. Quantitative genetics of postponed aging in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Analysis of outbred population. Genetics 127:719-727.
38. Imura O, 1980. Studies on the colour variation in larvae of Ephestia kühniella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera, Phycitidae). Kontyû 48:248-258.
39. Jamison MG, White JM, Vinson WE, and Hinkelmann K, 1975. Diallele analysis of growth traits in mice. Genetics 81:369-376.
40. Jinks JL and Broadhurst PL, 1963. Diallele analysis of litter size and body weight in rats. Heredity 18: 319-336.
41. Johnston DJ, Thompson JM, and Hammond K, 1992. Additive and nonadditive differences in postweaning growth and carcass characteristics of Devon, Hereford, and reciprocal-cross steers. J Anim Sci 70: 2688-2694.
42. Kerver WJM and Rotman G, 1987. Development of ethanol tolerance in relation to the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in Drosophila melanogaster. II. The influence of phenotypic adaptation and maternal effect on survival on alcohol supplemented media. Heredity 58:239-248.
43. Kidwell JF and Howard A, 1969. The inheritance of growth and form in the mouse. I. A diallele analysis of weight from birth through ten weeks. Growth 33: 269-289.
44. Kirby YK, Anthony NB, Hughes JD, McNew RW, Kirby JD, and Wideman RF, 1999. Electrocardiographic and genetic evaluation of giant jungle fowl, broilers, and their reciprocal crosses following unilateral bronchus occlusion. Poult Sci 78: 125-134.
45. Korpelainen H, 1999. Genetic maternal effects on human life span through the inheritance of mitochondrial DNA. Hum Hered 49:183-185.
46. Langston DT and Watson TF, 1975. Influence of genetic selection on diapause termination of the pink bollworm. Ann Entomol Soc Am 68:1102-1106.
47. Lanier GN, Classon A, Stewart T, Piston JJ, and Silverstein RM, 1980. Ips pini: the basis for interpopulational differences in pheromone biology. J Chem Ecol 6:677-687.
48. Laster ML and Sheng CF, 1995. Search for hybrid sterility for Helicoverpa zea in crosses between the North American H. zea and H. armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from China. J Econ Entomol 88:1288-1291.
49. Leclerq B, 1986. Observations on reciprocal F1 crosses between fat and lean lines of chickens. Arch Geflügelk 50:129-131.
50. Lee CT, 1973. Genetic analyses of nest-building behavior in laboratory mice (Mus musculus). Behav Genet 3:247-256.
51. Legates JE, 1972. The role of maternal effects in breeding: IV. Maternal effects in laboratory species. J Anim Sci 35:1294-1302.
52. Mather K and Jinks JL, 1971. Biometrical genetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
53. Miyo T, Keil CBO, Hough-Goldstein JA, and Oguma Y, 1999. Inheritance of resistance to esfenvalerate in Colorado beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J Econ Entomol 92:1031-1038.
54. Mousseau TA and Dingle H, 1991. Maternal effects in insect life histories. Ann Rev Entomol 36:511-534.
55. Mousseau TA and Fox CW, 1998. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Evol Ecol 13:403-406.
56. Nestor KE and Anderson JW, 1998. Effect of crossing a line selected for increased shank width and two commercial sire lines on performance and walking ability of turkeys. Poult Sci 77:1601-1607.
57. Nestor KE, Anderson JW, and Velleman SG, 2001a. Genetic variation in pure lines and crosses of large-bodied turkey lines. 1. Body weight, walking ability, and body measurements of live birds. Poult Sci 80:1087-1092.
58. Nestor KE, Anderson JW, and Velleman SG, 2001b. Genetic variation in pure lines and crosses of large-bodied turkey lines. 2. Carcass traits and body shape. Body weight, walking ability, and body measurements of live birds. Poult Sci 80:1093-1104.
59. Nylin S, Wickman P-O, and Wicklund C, 1994. Genetics of development time in a butterfly: predictions from optimality and a test by subspecies crossing. Proc R Soc Lond B 257:215-219.
60. Oliver CG, 1983. Disturbance of eclosion sequence in hybrid lepidoptera. Can Entomol 115:1445-1452.
61. Potti J, 1999. Maternal effects and the pervasive impact of nestling history on egg size in a passerine bird. Evolution 53:279-285.
62. Riihimaa AJ and Kimura MT, 1989. Genetics of the photoperiodic larval diapause in Chymomyza costata (Diptera; Drosophilidae). Hereditas 110:193-200.
63. Rockey SJ, Hainze JH, and Scriber JM, 1987. Evidence of a sex-linked diapause response in Papilio glaucus subspecies and their hybrids. Physiol Entomol 12: 181-184.
64. Rogers DA and McClearn GE, 1962. Alcohol preference of mice. In: Roots of behavior (Bliss L, ed). New York: Harper; 68-95.
65. Rossiter MC, 1996. Incidence and consequences of inherited environmental effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:451-476.
66. Royle NJ, Surai PF, and Hartley IR, 2001. Maternally derived androgens and antioxidants in bird eggs: complementary but opposing effects? Behav Ecol 12:381-385.
67. Ruiz-Dubreuil DG and del Solar E, 1993. A diallele analysis of gregarious oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 70:281-284.
68. Sanders CJ, Daterman GE, and Ennis TJ, 1977. Sex pheromone response of Choristoneura spp. and their hybrids (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can Entomol 109:1203-1220.
69. Schüler L and Borodin PM, 1976. Die Geschlechtsreife bei der weiblichen Maus - Eine genetische Analyse mit Hilfe der dialleleny Kreuzung. Z Versuchstierk 18: 296-302.
70. Schüler and Borodin PM, 1978. Genetische Analyse der endokrinen Drüsenmasse bei der Laboratoriumsmaus unter den Bedingungen der Belastung. Z Versuchstierk 20:293-304.
71. Schwartz WJ and Zimmerman P, 1990. Circadian timekeeping in BALB/c and C57BL/6 inbred mouse strains. J Neurosci 10:3685-3694.
72. Spencer WP, 1940. Subspecies, hybrids and speciation in Drosophila hydei and Drosophila virilis. Am Nat 74:157-179.
73. Starmer WT, Polak M, Wolf LL, and Barker JSF, 1998. Reproductive characteristics of the flower breeding Drosophila hibisci Bock (Drosophilidae) in eastern Australia: genetic and environmental determinants of ovariole number. Evolution 52:806-815.
74. Tai C and Rouvier R, 1998. Crossbreeding effect on sexual dimorphism of body weight in intergeneric hybrids obtained between Muscovy and Pekin duck. Genet Sel Evol 30:163-170.
75. Tanaka S, 1986. Developmental characteristics of two closely related species of Allonemobius and their hybrids. Oecologia 69:388-394.
76. Tess MW and MacNeil MD, 1994. Evaluation of cytoplasmic genetic effects in Miles City Line 1 Hereford cattle. J Anim Sci 72:851-856.
77. Thomas JD and Boethel DJ, 1995. Inheritance of permethrin resistance in the soybean looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Ecol 88:1536-1541.
78. Val FC, 1977. Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between two infertile species of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution 31:611-629.
79. van Dijken FR, van Sambeek MPJW, and Scharloo W, 1979. Divergent selection on locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. III. Genetic analysis. Behav Genet 9:563-570.
80. Wade MJ and Johnson NA, 1994. Reproductive isolation between two species of flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum and T. freemani: variation within and among geographical populations of T. castaneum. Heredity 72:155-162.
81. Walton A and Hammond J, 1938. The maternal effects on growth and conformation in Shire horse -Shetland pony crosses. Proc R Soc Lond B 125:311-335.
82. Wapstra E, 2000. Maternal basking opportunity affects juvenile phenotype in a viviparous lizard. Funct Ecol 14:345-352.
83. Warren DC, 1924. Inheritance of egg size in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 9:41-69.
84. White JM, Eisen EJ, and Legates JE, 1970. Sex-heterosis interaction, heterosis and reciprocal effects among mice selected for body weight. J Anim Sci 31:288-295.
85. Wichman HA and Lynch CB, 1991. Genetic variation for seasonal adaptation in Peromyscus leucopus: nonreciprocal breakdown in a population cross. J Hered 82:197-204.
86. Wolf JB, Brodie ED, Cheverud JM, Moore AJ, and Wade MJ, 1998. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Evol Ecol 13:64-69.
87. Wolfenbarger LL and Wilkinson GS, 2001. Sex-linked expression of a sexually selected trait in the stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Evolution 55:103-110.
88. Yalcin S, 1995. Effect of selection for high or low incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia for seven generations of live performance. Poult Sci 74:1411-1417.
89. Yang N, Dunnington EA, and Siegel PB, 1999. Heterosis following long-term bidirectional selection for mating frequency in male Japanese quail. Poult Sci 78:1252-1256.
90. Yonemura I, Motoyama T, and Hasekura H, 1989. Mode of inheritance of major genes controlling life span differences between two inbred strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 111:207-214.
91. Zouros E, 1981. The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mojavensis. Genetics 97:703-718.