Enamel conditioning for orthodontic bonding with a single-step bonding agent;Schmelzkonditionierung in der Bracketadhäsivtechnik mit einem "Single-step"-Haftvermittler

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 463-471

  Korbmacher, Heike ^b   Klocke, Arndt ^c   Huck, Lothar ^c   Kahl Nieke, Bärbel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Orthodontic bonding; Phosphoric acid conditioning; Prompt L Pop ; Single step bonding agent

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PHOSPHORIC ACID;

ADHESION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPARATIVE DENTISTRY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; DENTAL BONDING; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0036879645     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-002-0130-5     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aasen SM, Ario PD. Bonding systems: A comparison of maleic and phosphoric acids. J Dent Res 1993;72:137.Abstract 269.
2. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.
3. Berry TG, Barghi N, Knight GT, et al. Effectiveness of nitric-NPG as a conditioning agent for enamel. Am J Dent 1990;3:59-62.
4. Bishara SE, Gordon VV, van Wald L, et al. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:24-8.
5. Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ. The effect of acid etching on enamel, dentin and the inner surface of the resin restoration: A scanning electron microscopic investigation. J Dent Res 1977;56:917-23.
6. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849-53.
7. Cacciafesta V, Jost-Brinkmann P-G, Süßenberger U, et al. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:402-7.
8. Clinical Research Associates (CRA) newsletter. Core buildup and adhesive incompatibility. CRA Newsletter 2000;24:1-2.
9. Coreil MN, Mc Innes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR, et al. Shear bond strength of four orthodontic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:126-9.
10. Diedrich P, Dickmeiß B. Vergleich physikalischer und rasterelektronenoptischer Untersuchungen zur Adhäsion verschiedener Metallbrackets. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1983;44:298-310.
11. Diedrich P, Pohl N, Schwarze CW. Die Haftfestigkeit von Klebebrackets unter Zug- und Scherkräften. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1979; 40:408-15.
12. Diedrich P. Bracketadhäsivtechnik. In: Diedrich P, ed. Kieferorthopädie II. Therapie, 4th edn. München: Urban & Fischer, 2000.
13. Eberhard H, Hirschfelder U, Sindel J. Compomers - a new bracket bonding generation in orthodontics? J Orofac Orthop/Fortschr Kieferorthop 1997;58:62-9.
14. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil™ Liner Bond 2 in class V restorations. Am J Dent 1997;10:66-70.
15. Fischer-Brandies H, Monsees M. Schmelzschäden bei Mehrfachdebonding in der Bracketadhäsivtechnik. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1993; 54:43-7.
16. Fritz UB, Diedrich P, Finger WJ. Self-etching primers - an alternative to the conventional acid etch technique? J Orofac Orthop/Fortschr Kieferorthop 2001;62:238-45.
17. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Uno S. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 1996;12:161-6.
18. Fritz UB, Graf I, Hilgers RD. Scherbindungsfestigkeit von Komposit an Schmelz bei wiederholter Therapie. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996;51:180-3.
19. Gange P. Present state of bonding. J Clin Orthod 1995;7:429-36.
20. Gottlieb EW, Retief DH, Jamison HC. An optimal concentration of phosphoric acid as an etching agent. Part I: Tensile bond strength studies. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:48-51.
21. Graf I, Jacobi B. Haftfestigkeit verschiedener Fluorid freisetzender Bracketadhäsivsysteme. J Orofac Orthop/Fortschr Kieferorthop 2000;61:191-8.
22. Hermsen RJ, Vrijhoef MMA. Loss of enamel due to etching with phosphoric and maleic acid. Dent Mater 1993;9:332-6.
23. Issa MH, Watts DC. Shear strength of a compomer adhesive to enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1999;78:IADR Abstract 2725.
24. Jost-Brinkmann P-G, Bohme, A. Shear bond strengths attained in vitro with light-cured glass ionomers vs composite adhesives in bonding ceramic brackets to metal or porcelain. J Adhes Dent 1999;3:243-53.
25. Jost-Brinkmann P-G, Drost C, Can S. In-vitro-Studie zur Haftfestigkeit von Brackets auf Metallen, Keramik und Komposit. Teil 1. Kleben auf Edelmetallen und Amalgam. J Orofac Orthop/Fortschr Kieferorthop 1996;57:76-87.
26. Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of saliva contamination on micromorphological adaptation of single-bottle adhesives to etched enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1999;24:69-74.
27. Katona T-R. A comparison of the stress developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:244-51.
28. Legler LR, Retief DH, Bradley EL, et al. Effects of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bonding resin to enamel: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:485-92.
29. Legler LR, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Effect of phosphoric acid concentration and etch duration on enamel depth of etch: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:154-60.
30. Manhart J, Hickel R. Klinische Studie zum Einsatz eines All-in-one-Adhäsivs. Quintessenz 1999;12:1277-88.
31. Olsen ME, Bishara SE, Damon P, et al. Evaluation of Scotchbond multipurpose and maleic acid as alternative methods of bonding orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111: 498-501.
32. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: Etching effects on underground enamel. Dent Mater 2001;17:430-44.
33. Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, et al. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 1997;3:142-6.
34. Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC, and g[ass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:36-42.
35. Sadowsky PL, Retief DH, Cox PR, et al. Effect of etchant concentration and duration on the retention of orthodontic brackets: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:417-21.
36. Sano H, Yoshikawa T, Pereira PNR, et al. Long term durability of dentin bonds made with a self etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res 1999;78:906-11.
37. Süßenberger U, Cacciafesta V, Jost-Brinkmann P-G. Lichthärtender Glasionomerzement als Bracketkleber bei unterschiedlicher Schmelzkonditionierung. J Orofac Orthop/Fortschr Kieferorthop 1997;58:174-80.
38. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Enamel bond strength of "one-bottle" adhesives. Pediatr Dent 1998;4:259-62.
39. Tay FR, PashLey DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308.
40. Uno S, Finger WJ. Effect of acid etchant composition and etch duration on enamel loss and resin composite bonding. Am J Dent 1995;8:165-9.
41. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-p self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73:1212-20.
42. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, et al. Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1998; 26:609-16.