The beholder's share in the perception of orientation of 2-D shapes

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 64, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 1227-1247

  Liu, Baoxia ^a,b   Dijkstra, Tjeerd M H ^a   Oomes, Augustinus H J ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036878274     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194768     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ANDREWS, D. P. (1967). Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea: Part I. Short lines. Vision Research, 1, 975-997.
2. APPELLE, S. (1972). Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: The "oblique effect" in man and animals. Psychological Bulletin, 78, 266-278.
3. BOUMA, H., & ANDRIESSEN, J. J. (1968). Perceived orientation of isolated line segments. Vision Research, 8, 493-507.
4. BOWKER, D. O., & MANDLER, M. B. (1981). Apparent contrast of suprathreshold gratings varies with stimulus orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 585-588.
5. COPPOLA, D. M., PURVES, H. R., MCCOY, A. N., & PURVES, D. (1998). The distribution of oriented contours in the real world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 95, 4002-4006.
6. DRAPER, N. R., & SMITH, H. (1998). Applied regression analysis. New York: Wiley.
7. FISHER, N. J. (1993). Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. GOMBRICH, E. H. (1959). Art and illusion. London: Phaidon.
9. GREENE, E., FRAWLEY, W., & SWIMM, R. (2000). Individual differences in collinearity judgment as a function of angular position. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1440-1458.
10. HEELEY, D. W., & BUTHANAN-SMITH, H. M. (1990). Recognition of stimulus orientation. Vision Research, 30, 1429-1437.
11. HORN, B. K. P. (1986). Robot vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. HOWARD, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley.
13. JUDGE, G. G., HILL, R. C., GRIFFITHS, W. E., LUTKEPOHL, H., & LEE, T. (1988). Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics. New York: Wiley.
14. KNILL, D. C., & RICHARDS, W. (1996). Perception as Bayesian inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. KOENDERINK, J. J., VAN DOORN, A. J., & KAPPERS, A. M. L. (1992). Surface perception in pictures. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 487-496.
16. LI, W., & WESTHEIMER, G. (1997). Human discrimination of the implicit orientation of simple symmetrical patterns. Vision Research, 37, 565-572.
17. MALONEY, L. T. & KOH, K. (1988). A method for calibrating the spatial coordinates of a visual display to high accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 372-389.
18. OOMES, A. H. J., & DIJKSTRA, T. M. H. (2002). Object pose: Perceiving 3-D shape as sticks and slabs. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 507-520.
19. REGAN, D. (2000). Human perception of objects. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
20. REGAN, D., & HAMSTRA, S. J. (1992). Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size. Vision Research, 32, 1845-1864.
21. SCHOUPS, A., VOGELS, R., QIAN, N., & ORBAN, G. (2001). Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons. Nature, 412, 549-553.
22. SWITKES, E., MAYER, M. J., & SLOAN, J. A. (1978). Spatial frequency analysis of the visual environment: Anisotropy and the carpentered environment hypothesis. Vision Research, 18, 1393-1399.
23. VOGELS, R., & ORBAN, G. A. (1985). The effect of practice on the oblique effect in line orientation judgments. Vision Research, 25, 1679-1687.
24. WESTHEIMER, G., & BEARD, B. L. (1998). Orientation dependency for foveal line stimuli. Vision Research, 38, 1097-1103.