Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: One-year results of the French AneuRx trial

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 685-692

  Ricco, Jean Baptiste ^a,e   Letort, Michel ^b   Magnan, Pierre Edouard ^c   Pacchioni, Roberto ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^b MEDTRONIC INC   (United States)

^c TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^e University of Poitiers   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; ANEURYSM SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGING; IMPLANTATION; MALE; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION PROCESS; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL EMBOLISM; DEVICE REMOVAL; EVALUATION; FRANCE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; ILIAC ARTERY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; SURVIVAL; TIME; VALIDATION STUDY; VASCULAR SURGERY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; DEVICE REMOVAL; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRANCE; HUMANS; ILIAC ARTERY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT DISCHARGE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; STENTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 0036878260     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10016-001-0311-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Johnston KW. Multicenter prospective study of non ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Part II: variables predicting morbidity and mortality. J Vasc Surg 1989;9:437-447.
2. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5:491-499.
3. May J, White GH, Yu W, et al. Concurrent comparison of endoluminal versus open repair in treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of 303 patients by life-table method. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:213-221.
4. Zarins CK, White RA, Schwarten D, et al. For the investigators of the Medtronic AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. AneuRx stent graft vs open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: multicenter prospective clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:292-308.
5. Zarins CK, White RA, Moll FL, et al. The AneuRx stent graft: four-year results and worldwide experience 2000. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:S135-S145.
6. Ahn SS, Rutherford KW, May J, et al. Reporting standards for infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:405-410.
7. White GH, May J, Waugh RC, Yu W. Type I and type II endoleaks: a more useful classification for reporting results of endoluminal AAA repair. J Endovasc Surg 1998;5:189-193.
8. Harris PL, Vallabhaneni SR, Desgranges P, et al. Incidence and risk factors of late rupture, conversion, and death after endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms: the Eurostar experience. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:739-749.
9. Sapirstein W, Chandeysson , Wentz C. The Food and Drug Administration approval of endovascular grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm: an 18-month retrospective. J Vasc Surg 2001;34:180-183.
10. White GH, May J, Petrasek P, et al. Endotension: an explanation for continued AAA growth after successful endoluminal repair. J Endovasc Surg 1999;8:308-315.
11. Zarins CK, White RA, Fogarty TJ. Aneurysm rupture after endovascular repair using the AneuRx stent graft. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:960-969.