Data continuation for the explicit solution of an inverse biomagnetic problem

IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 3620-3632

  Popov, Mikhail ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biomagnetism; Cauchy problem; Data continuation; Diode source; Explicit identification; MEG

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; CURRENT DENSITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; ERRORS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS; MAGNETIC FIELD MEASUREMENT; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MAXWELL EQUATIONS;

BIOMAGNETISM; CAUCHY PROBLEM; DATA CONTINUATION; DIPOLE SOURCE; EXPLICIT IDENTIFICATION;

MAGNETISM;

EID: 0036874846     PISSN: 00189464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2002.804810     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R. J. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila, and O. V. Lounasmaa, "Magnetoencephalography-Theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain," Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 65, pp. 413-497, Apr. 1993.
2. H. Helmholtz, "Ueber einige Gesetze der Vertheilung elektrischer Ströme in köperlichen Leitern, mit Anwendung auf die thierischelektrischen Versuche," Ann. Phys. Chem., vol. 89, pp. 211-233, 353-377, 1853.
3. J. P. Mäkelä, "Neurological application of MEG," in Visualization of Information Processing in the Human Brain: Recent Advances in MEG and Functional MRI, I. Hashimoto, Y. Okada, and S. Ogawa, Eds., 1996, pp. 343-355.
4. J. C. Mosher, P. S. Lewis, and R. M. Leahy, "Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG dipole," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 39, pp. 541-557, June 1992.
5. N. Bleistein and J. K. Cohen, "Nonuniqueness in the inverse source problem in acoustics and electromagnetics," J. Math. Phys., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 194-201, 1977.
6. J. Sarvas, "Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem," Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 32, pp. 11-22, Jan. 1987.
7. J. C. Mosher, R. M. Leahy, and P. S. Lewis, "EEG and MEG: Forward solutions for inverse methods," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 46, pp. 245-259, Mar. 1999.
8. M. Norgren, "Improvement of the numerical BEM solution to the direct MEG problem by using a reciprocal formulation: A lead field approach," Dept. Electromagnetic Theory, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, Tech. Rep. TRITA-TET-98-20, Dec. 1998.
9. K. Uutela, M. Hämäläinen, and R. Salmelin, "Global optimization in the localization of neuromagnetic sources," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 45, pp. 716-723, June 1998.
10. M. Popov, M. Norgren, and S. He, "A robust approach for the full identification of a class of multiple dipole sources in a human brain using spatio-temporal MEG data," KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, Tech. Rep. TRITA-TET-01-04, Mar. 2001.
11. J. C. Mosher and R. M. Leahy, "Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC," IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 47, pp. 332-340, Feb. 1999.
12. S. He and M. Norgren, "Magnetostatic image and its application to an analytic identification of a current dipole inside a conducting sphere," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 47, pp. 183-191, Feb. 2000.
13. M. Norgren, "Localization of epileptic foci from measurement of the neuromagnetic field outside the human head," in Proc. EMB98-Electromagnetic Computations for Analysis and Design of Complex Systems, 1998, p. 182-187.
14. S. He and V. G. Romanov, "Identification of small flaws in conductors using magnetostatic measurements," Math. Comput. Simul., vol. 50, pp. 457-471, 1999.
15. ____, and V. G. Romanov, "Identification of dipole sources in a bounded domain for Maxwell's equations," Wave Motion, vol. 28, pp. 25-40, 1998.
16. S. He, "Frequency series expansion of an explicit solution for a dipole inside a conducting sphere at low frequency," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 41, pp. 1249-1258, Oct. 1998.
17. V. Isakov, Inverse Source Problems. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Soc., 1990.
18. J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics. New York: Wiley, 1975.
19. D. L. Colton, Partial Differential Equations. An Introduction. New York: Random House, 1988.
20. M. M. Lavrent'ev, V. G. Romanov, and S. P. Shishatskii, "Ill-posed problems of mathematical physics and analysis," in Translations of Math. Monographs 64. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Soc., 1986.
21. G. Arfken, Mathematical Methods for Physicists. New York: Academic, 1970.
22. P. S. Waterman, "Symmetry, unitarity, and geometry in electromagnetic scattering," Phys. Rev. D, Part. Fields, vol. 3, pp. 825-839, Feb. 15, 1971.
23. A. G. Ramm, "Convergence of the T-matrix approach in scattering theory," J. Math. Phys., vol. 23, pp. 1123-1125, June 1983.
24. G. Kristensson, A. G. Ramm, and S. Ström, "Convergence of the T-matrix approach in scattering theory. II," J. Math. Phys., vol. 24, pp. 2619-2631, Nov. 1983.
25. S. Ström, "Introduction to integral representations and integral equations for time-harmonic acoustic, electromagnetic and elastodynamic wave fields," in Field Representations and Introduction to Scattering, V. V. Varadan, A. Lakhtakia, and V. K. Varadan, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1991, vol. 1.
26. N. Morita, N. Kumagai, and J. R. Mautz, Integral Equation Methods for Electromagnetics. Boston, MA: Artech House, 1990.
27. L. E. Payne, Improperly Posed Problems in Partial Differential Equations. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1975.
28. J. C. de Munck, R. Bhagwandien, S. H. Muller, F. C. Verster, and M. B. van Herk, "The computation of MR image distortions caused by tissue susceptibility using the boundary element method," IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 15, pp. 620-627, May 1996.
29. H. A. Schlitt, et al., "Evaluation of boundary element methods for the EEG forward problem: Effect of linear interpolation," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 42, pp. 52-58, Jan. 1995.
30. A. S. Ferguson, "A complete linear discretization for calculating the magnetic field using the boundary element method," IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 41, pp. 455-460, May 1994.