Facial analysis: Mantaining ethnic balance

Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 343-349

  Parker Porter, Jennifer ^a   Lee, Janet I ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; ASIAN; CAUCASIAN; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONSULTATION; ESTHETIC SURGERY; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; ETHNIC GROUP; FACE PROFILE; FACE SURGERY; FACIES; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MOTIVATION; NEGRO; NOSE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; REVIEW; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AFRICAN AMERICAN; ESTHETICS; FACE; HISPANIC; HISTOLOGY;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; ANTHROPOMETRY; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; ESTHETICS; ETHNIC GROUPS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FACE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS;

EID: 0036873728     PISSN: 10647406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1064-7406(02)00030-5     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Farkas LG, Kolar JC. Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetic of women's faces. Clin Plast Surg 1987; 14:599-616.
2. Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the aesthetic face. New York: Thieme-Stratton; 1984.
3. Farkas LG, Forrest CR, Litsas L. Revision of neoclassical facial canons in young adult Afro-Americans. Aesth Plast Surg 2000;24:179-84.
4. Le TT, Farkas LG, Ngim RC, Levin LS, Forrest CR. Proportionality in Asian and North American Caucasian faces using neoclassical facial canons as criteria. Aesth Plast Surg 2002;26:64-9.
5. Milgrim LM, Lawson W, Cohen AF. Anthropometric analysis of the female Latino nose: revised aesthetic concepts and their surgical implications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:1079-86.
6. Porter JP, Olson KL. Anthropometric facial analysis of the African American female. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001;3:191-7.
7. Yellin SA. Aesthetics for the next millennium. Facial Plast Surg 1997;13:231-9.
8. Vegter F, Hage JJ. Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106(5):1090-6.
9. Gonzalez Ulloa M. Quantitative principles in cosmetic surgery of the face (profileplasty). Plast Reconstr Surg 1962;29:186.
10. Dawei W, Guozheng Q, Mingli Z, Farkas LG. Differences in horizontal, neoclassical facial canons in Chinese (Han) and North American Caucasian populations. Aesth Plast Surg 1997;21:265-9.
11. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face. New York: Raven Press; 1994.
12. Ofodile FA, Bokhari FJ, Ellis C. The black American nose. Ann Plast Surg 1993;31:209-18.
13. Ofodile FA, Bokhari FJ. The African American Nose: part II. Ann Plast Surg 1995;34:123-9.
14. Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:3328-337.
15. Jeffries III JM, DiBernardo B, Rauscher GE. Computer analysis of the African American face. Ann Plast Surg 1995;34:318-21.
16. Ortiz-Monasterio F, Olmedo A. Rhinoplasty on the Mestizo nose. Clin Plast Surg 1977;4(1):89-102.
17. Sanchez AE. Rhinoplasty in the "Chata" nose of the Caribbean. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1980;4:169-77.
18. Crumley RL, Lanser M. Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. Laryngoscope, 1988;98:202-8.
19. Sim RS, Smith JD, Chan AS. Comparison of the aesthetic facial proportions of southern Chinese and white women. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2000;2:113-20.