Transition spectra for a BCS superconductor with multiple gaps: Model calculations for MgB2

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 17, 2002, Pages 1725011-1725014

  Barabash, Sergey V ^a   Stroud, David ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BORON DERIVATIVE; MAGNESIUM DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONDUCTOR; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MEASUREMENT; MODEL; PHYSICS; SPECTROSCOPY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 0036870805     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A.Y. Liu, I.I. Mazin, and J. Kortus Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 087005 (2001).
2. H.J. Choi et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 020513 (2002); cond-mat/0111183 (unpublished).
3. 3D(k) are calculated to be essentially isotropic (i.e., only weakly dependent on k); the subscripts here refer to the topologies of the corresponding Fermi surfaces.
4. F. Bouquet et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 047001 (2001); R. A. Fisher et al., in Studies of High Temperature Superconductors, Vol. 38, edited by A. V. Narlikar (Nova Science, Commack, NY, 2001); F. Bouquet et al., Europhys. Lett. 56, 856 (2001).
5. F. Bouquet et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 047001 (2001); R. A. Fisher et al., in Studies of High Temperature Superconductors, Vol. 38, edited by A. V. Narlikar (Nova Science, Commack, NY, 2001); F. Bouquet et al., Europhys. Lett. 56, 856 (2001).
6. F. Bouquet et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 047001 (2001); R. A. Fisher et al., in Studies of High Temperature Superconductors, Vol. 38, edited by A. V. Narlikar (Nova Science, Commack, NY, 2001); F. Bouquet et al., Europhys. Lett. 56, 856 (2001).
7. A.A. Golubov et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 1353 (2002).
8. H. Schmidt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 127002 (2002).
9. Yu.G. Naidyuk et al. JETP Lett. 75, 238 (2002).
10. A. Brinkman et al., Phys. Rev. B 65, 180517 (2002).
11. A.I. D'yachenko et al., cond-mat/0201200 (unpublished).
12. Tsuda et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 177006 (2001).
13. M.-S. Kim et al., cond-mat/0201550 (unpublished).
14. D.C. Mattis and J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. 111, 412 (1958).
15. I.I. Mazin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 107002 (2002).
16. R.A. Kaindl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 027003 (2002).
17. S.B. Nam, Phys. Rev. 156, 470 (1967); 156, 487 (1967); P.B. Allen, Phys. Rev. B 3, 305 (1971).
18. S.B. Nam, Phys. Rev. 156, 470 (1967); 156, 487 (1967); P.B. Allen, Phys. Rev. B 3, 305 (1971).
19. S.B. Nam, Phys. Rev. 156, 470 (1967); 156, 487 (1967); P.B. Allen, Phys. Rev. B 3, 305 (1971).
20. O. Klein et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 6307 (1994).
21. D≈7.5 meV.
22. M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996), pp. 79-89.
23. T. Yildirim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037001 (2001).
24. To calculate corrections resulting from any noncancellation of linear terms in Eq. (2) would require a treatment more elaborate than the BCS picture discussed here.
25. Y. Masuda, Phys. Rev. 126, 1271 (1962).
26. R. A. Kaindl (private communication).
27. A.V Pronin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 097003 (2001).
28. A.A. Golubov and I.I. Mazin, Phys. Rev. B 55, 15 146 (1997).
29. C(0) were taken from Ref. 1 [1.38, 0.66, and 2.78 states/(Ry spin primitive cell)].
30. 3D = 2 meV and is responsible for the large background below 5 meV, again consistent with experiment.