Sample size requirements for in situ vegetation and substrate classifications in shallow, Natural Nebraska Lakes

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 1329-1333

  Paukert, Craig P ^a,c   Willis, David W ^a   Holland, Richard S ^b  

^a SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS COMMISSION   (United States)

^c U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CLASSIFICATION; LAKE; SUBSTRATE; VEGETATION; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036860743     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: 15488675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(2002)022<1329:SSRFIS>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Dare, M. R., and W. A. Hubert. 2000. Precision and interpretation of data collected using a new measurement technique for microhabitat features at fish locations determined by radio telemetry. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 15:29-38.
2. Durocher, P. P., W. C. Provine, and J. E. Kraii. 1984. Relationship between abundance of largemouth bass and submergent vegetation in Texas reservoirs. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 4:84-88.
3. Guy, C. G., and D. W. Willis. 1991. Relationship between environmental variables and density oflarge-mouth bass in South Dakota ponds. Proceedings of the South Dakota Academy of Science 70:109-117.
4. Krebs, C. J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper Collins, New York.
5. Larson, G. E. 1993. Aquatic and wetland vascular plants in the northern Great Plains. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report RM-238.
6. McMahon, T. E., A. V. Zale, and D. J. Orth. 1996. Aquatic habitat measurements. Pages 83-120 in B. R. Murphy and D. W. Willis, editors. Fisheries techniques, 2nd edition. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
7. Paukert, C. P., and D. W. Willis. 2000. Factors influencing panfish populations in Nebraska sandhill lakes. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration, Project F-118-R, Job 1, Study 1, Completion Report, Lincoln.
8. Paukert, C. P., D. W. Willis, and J. A. Klammer. 2002. Effects of predation and environment on quality of yellow perch and bluegill populations in Nebraska sandhill lakes. North American Journal ofFisheries Management 22:86-95.
9. Platts, W. S., W. F. Megahan, and G. W. Minshall. 1983. Methods for evaluating stream, riparian, and biotic conditions. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report INT-138.
10. Poole, G. C., C. A. Frissell, and S. C. Ralph. 1997. Instream habitat unit classification: inadequacies for monitoring and some consequences for management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33:879-896.
11. Roper, B. B., and D. L. Scarnecchia. 1995. Observer variability in classifying habitat types in stream surveys. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 15:49-53.
12. Simonson, T. D. 1993. Correspondence and relative precision of stream habitat features estimated at two spatial scales. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 8: 363-372.
13. Trebitz, A. S., S. Carpenter, P. Cunningham, B. Johnson, R. Lillie, D. Marshall, T. Martin, R. Narf, T. Pellett, S. Stewart, C. Storlie, and J. Unmuth. 1997. A model of bluegill-largemouth bass interactions in relation to aquatic vegetation and management. Ecological Modelling 94:139-156.
14. Wang, L., T. D. Simonson, and J. Lyons. 1996. Accuracy and precision of selected stream habitat estimation. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:340-347.
15. Wright, J. F., P. D. Hiley, S. F. Ham, and A. D. Berrie. 1981. Comparison of three mapping procedures developed for river macrophytes. Freshwater Biology 11:369-379.