Magnetic resonance phase contrast velocity measurement for non-invasive follow up after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty

Vasa - Journal of Vascular Diseases

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 235-240

  Heverhagen, J T ^a   Wagner, Hans Joachim ^a,b,c   Bandorski, D ^a   Hoppe, M ^a   Alfke, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Blood flow; Magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging; Restenosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMAGING; LIMB; MAGNETIC RESONANCE PHASE CONTRAST VELOCIMETRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; POLARIZATION; RESTENOSIS; THICKNESS; WALKING;

EID: 0036858281     PISSN: 03011526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526.31.4.235     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alfke H, Heverhagen JT, Bandorski D, Hoppe M., Wagner HJ. Prospective comparison of MR phase contrast velocimetry and intravascular Doppler ultrasound during infrainguinal artery angioplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12: 459-63.
2. Alson MD, Lang EV, Kaufman JA. Pedal Arterial Imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8: 9-18.
3. Debatin JF. MR quantification of flow in abdominal vessels. Abdom Imaging 1998; 23: 485-95.
4. Di Mario C, Meneveau N, Gil R et al. Maximal blood flow velocity in severe coronary stenoses measured with a Doppler guidewire. Limitations for the application of the continuity equation in the assessment of stenosis severity. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 54D-61D.
5. Evans AJ, Iwai F, Grist TA et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow with a phase subtraction technique. Invest Radiol 1993; 28: 109-15.
6. Haacke EM, Smith AS, Lin W et al. Velocity quantification in magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 3: 34-49.
7. Hoppe M, Heverhagen JT, Kunisch M et al. Correlation of flow velocity measurements by magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging and intravascular Doppler ultrasound. Invest Radiol 1998; 33: 427-32.
8. Pelc LR, Pelc NJ, Rayhill SC et al. Arterial and venous blood flow: Noninvasive quantification with MR imaging. Radiology 1992; 185: 809-12.
9. Phillips-Hughes J, Kandarpa K. Restenosis: Pathophysiology and preventive strategies. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1996; 7: 321-33.
10. Ranke C, Creutzig A, Alexander K. Duplex scanning of the peripheral arteries: Correlation of the peak velocity ratio with angiographic diameter reduction. Ultrasound Med Biol 1992; 18; 433-40.
11. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: Revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26: 517-38.
12. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Bock M et al. Renal artery stenosis: Grading of hemodynamic changes with cine phase-contrast MR blood flow measurements. Radiology 1997; 203: 45-53.
13. Shetty AN, Shirkhoda A, Bis KG et al. 3D breath-hold contrast-enhanced MRA: A preliminary experience in aorta and iliac vascular disease. J Computed Assist Tomogr 1998; 22: 179-85.
14. Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Radiology 1990; 177: 619-26.
15. Visser K, Hunink MGM. Peripheral arterial disease: Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography versus color-guided duplex US - A meta-analysis. Radiology 2000; 216: 67-77.
16. Zierler RE. Vascular surgery without arteriography: Use of Duplex ultrasound. Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 7: 74-82.